journal article·2013-12

Current Understanding and Remaining Challenges in Modeling Long‐Term Degradation of Borosilicate Nuclear Waste Glasses

John D. Vienna, Joseph V. Ryan, Stéphane Gin, Yaohiro Inagaki

Publisher page

Abstract

Chemical durability is not a single material property that can be uniquely measured. Instead, it is the response to a host of coupled material and environmental processes whose rates are estimated by a combination of theory, experiment and modeling. High‐level nuclear waste ( HLW ) glass is perhaps the most studied of any material yet there remain significant technical gaps regarding their chemical durability. The phenomena affecting the long‐term performance of HLW glasses in their disposal environment include surface reactions, transport properties to and from the reacting glass surface, and ion exchange between the solid glass and the surrounding solution and alteration products. The rates of these processes are strongly influenced and are coupled through the solution chemistry, which is in turn influenced by the reacting glass and also by reaction with the near‐field materials and precipitation of alteration products. Therefore, those processes must be understood sufficiently well to estimate or bound the performance of HLW glass in its disposal environment over geologic time scales. This article summarizes the current state of understanding of surface reactions, transport properties and ion exchange along with the near‐field materials and alteration products influences on solution chemistry and glass reaction rates. Also summarized are the remaining technical gaps along with recommended approaches to fill those technical gaps.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Energy and Environment Directorate Richland Washington 99352

CEA Marcoule DTCD SECM F‐30207 Bagnols‐sur‐Cèze France

Department of Applied Quantum Physics and Nuclear Engineering Kyushu University Fukuoda 812‐8581 Japan

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. Cunnane J. C. · 1993 · 225
2. Bates J. K. · 1994
3. Glamor – or How We Achieved a Common Understanding on the Decrease of Glass Dissolution Kinetics
4. Van Iseghem P.
5. Ebert W. L. · 1993 · 569
6. Barkatt A. · 1991 · 65
7. 10.1016/0022-3115(92)90090-810.1016/0022-3115(92)90090-8 ↗
8. 10.2172/1500116210.2172/15001162 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0022-3115(97)00349-810.1016/S0022-3115(97)00349-8 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.00210.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.002 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.12.00710.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.12.007 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.01010.1016/j.jnucmat.2003.09.010 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00573-610.1016/S0022-3115(01)00573-6 ↗
14. 10.1016/0022-3093(75)90079-410.1016/0022-3093(75)90079-4 ↗
15. The Reaction Between Glass and Water. Part 1. Experimental Methods and Observations
16. The Reaction Between Glass and Water. Part 2. Discussion for the Results
17. 10.2172/663189110.2172/6631891 ↗
18. Bunker B. C. · 1984 · 41
19. Pederson L. R. · 1983 · 47
20. B.Grambow “Ein Physikalisch‐Chemisches Modell fuer den Mechanismus der Glaskorrosion unter besonderer Beruecksichtigung Simulierter Radioaktiver Abfallglaeser ” Ph.D. Thesis Freien Universitaet Berlin 1984.
21. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.02410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.024 ↗
22. 10.2475/ajs.282.3.23710.2475/ajs.282.3.237 ↗
23. W. L.Bourcieret al. “Solution Compositional Effects on the Dissolution Kinetics of Borosilicate Glass ”Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Water‐Rock Interaction Conference eds. Y. K.Kharaka A. S.Maest andA. A.Balkema.Rotterdam the Netherlands 81–84 1992.
24. 10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00041-610.1016/S0022-3115(00)00041-6 ↗
25. Grambow B. · 1987
26. Grambow B. · 1985 · 16
27. Bourcier W. L. · 1990 · 209
28. Bourcier W. L. · 1994 · 507
29. Knauss K. G. · 1990 · 371
30. Advocat T. · 1990 · 214
31. 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00664-010.1016/S0016-7037(01)00664-0 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0016-7037(03)00176-510.1016/S0016-7037(03)00176-5 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00040-410.1016/S0022-3115(00)00040-4 ↗
34. 10.1021/j100567a01210.1021/j100567a012 ↗
35. Lasaga A. C. · Rev. Mineral. · 1995 · 353
36. Lichtner P. C. · 1998 · 5
37. 10.1016/j.gca.2007.10.01110.1016/j.gca.2007.10.011 ↗
38. 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90003-410.1016/0016-7037(90)90003-4 ↗
39. 10.1016/0016-7037(94)90281-X10.1016/0016-7037(94)90281-X ↗
40. Freude E. · 1985 · 99
41. 10.1007/BF0058764810.1007/BF00587648 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.00410.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.004 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.04410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.044 ↗
44. 10.1038/nmat230110.1038/nmat2301 ↗
45. Wallace R. M. · 1983 · 23
46. 10.1021/jp205477q10.1021/jp205477q ↗
47. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.04.00110.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.04.001 ↗
48. Gin S. · 2001 · 207
49. Chick L. A. · 1984 · 635
50. Grambow B. · 1984 · 623
51. 10.1016/S0883-2927(00)00068-810.1016/S0883-2927(00)00068-8 ↗
52. 10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00039-810.1016/S0022-3115(00)00039-8 ↗
53. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00643-210.1016/S0022-3115(01)00643-2 ↗
54. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00619-510.1016/S0022-3115(01)00619-5 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.02410.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.04.024 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.03210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.032 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.02610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.026 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.10.01010.1016/j.chemgeo.2010.10.010 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.09510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.095 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.02310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.07.023 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.03.00210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2007.03.002 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.00510.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.04.005 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.01510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.07.015 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.03.01810.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.03.018 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.gca.2010.01.00110.1016/j.gca.2010.01.001 ↗
66. Characteristics of Alteration Layers Formed on Simulated HLW Glass under Silica‐saturated Solutions
67. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.02.01910.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.02.019 ↗
68. Comparison of Sodium Leaching Rates from A Na2O‐3SiO2 Glass in H2O and D2O
69. The Chemical Durability of K2O‐CaO‐MgO‐SiO2 Glasses
70. Clark D. E. · 1979
71. Modeling of Glass Leaching
72. Evaluation of Chemical‐Stability of Vitrification Media for Radioactive‐Waste Products
73. Mechanisms That Control Aqueous Leaching of Nuclear Waste Glass10.13182/NT82-A32853 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.04.02310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.04.023 ↗
75. 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90022-110.1016/0022-3093(94)90022-1 ↗
76. Effects of Salt Solutions on Glass Dissolution
77. Temperature Effects on the Leaching Behavior of a High‐level Waste Glass Form10.13182/NT98-A2900 ↗
78. Sheng J. · 1999 · 401
79. 10.2172/1368710.2172/13687 ↗
80. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00890-010.1016/S0022-3093(01)00890-0 ↗
81. Chen Y. · 1997 · 1051
82. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.06.01610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.06.016 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.09510.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.10.095 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.07510.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.10.075 ↗
85. 10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00154-X10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00154-X ↗
86. Van Iseghem P. · 1988 · 631
87. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.03.01010.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.03.010 ↗
88. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00434-210.1016/S0022-3115(01)00434-2 ↗
89. Muller I. S · 2006 · 191
90. Results from Long‐Term Use of the MCC‐1 Static Leach Test Method
91. 10.1155/2011/79645710.1155/2011/796457 ↗
92. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.06810.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.07.068 ↗
93. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.02510.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.05.025 ↗
94. 10.2172/90820610.2172/908206 ↗
95. Ebert W. L. · 2011
96. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.02310.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.023 ↗
97. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.07.06510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.07.065 ↗
98. The Role of Aluminium in the Durability of Alumino‐borosilicate Glasses
99. 10.1016/0022-3115(92)90088-310.1016/0022-3115(92)90088-3 ↗
100. Influence of Calcium on Sodium Aluminosilicate Glass Leaching Behaviour