journal article·2023-03-08Open access

Color Change, Biaxial Flexural Strength, and Fractographic Analysis of Resin-Modified CAD/CAM Ceramics Subjected to Different Surface Finishing Protocols

Mona Alhassan, Ahmed Maawadh, Nawaf Labban, Nourah Shono, Ahmad Alebdi, Saleh Alhijji, Abdulelah M. BinMahfooz

Applied Sciences· Volume 13· Issue 6

Abstract

This in vitro study compared the color change (∆E) and biaxial flexural strength (BFS) of two resin nanoceramics (LU and CS) and two polymer-infiltrated ceramic networks (VE and CU) after different surface finishing protocols. A total of 192 discs (12 × 1.2 mm2) were prepared from the materials (n = 48) and then polished with 1200-grit silicon carbide paper, followed by roughening with a 30 µm grit diamond bur. According to the surface finishing applied, the discs from each material category were categorized into four groups: control group (no finishing), polishing (MP), glazing (OG), or a combination of MP and additional polishing (MP+PP). Following surface finishing, all the discs were immersed in a coffee beverage to simulate one year of clinical use. A spectrophotometer and universal testing machine were used to measure the ∆E and BFS, respectively. Fractographic analysis was performed using scanning electron microscopy images. Multivariate analysis of variance was used for the statistical analysis, followed by one-way ANOVA and post hoc Dunnett’s test (a = 0.05). The ∆E and BFS were significantly impacted by material type and surface finishing (p ≤ 0.05). Irrespective of the materials and finishing, untreated LU and OG-treated VE specimens demonstrated the highest (2.98 ± 0.36) and lowest (1.21 ± 0.33) color changes. Regarding BFS, untreated CU and OG-treated CS specimens demonstrated the lowest (121.88 ± 2.08 MPa) and highest (174.17 ± 3.83 MPa) values. Surface finishing using glazing resulted in the highest BFS and lowest ∆E compared to other surface finishing protocols for the tested materials. VE demonstrated the least color changes, and CS showed the highest BFS following surface finishing of the materials tested. Surface finishing is material dependent; thus, it is critical to use the best surface finishing protocol in a clinical setting.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental materials and restorations · Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

Security Forces Hospital, Ministry of Interior, Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia

Dental Health Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh 11545, Saudi Arabia

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. Alhassan, M., Maawadh, A., Labban, N., Alnafaiy, S.M., Alotaibi, H.N., and BinMahfooz, A.M. (2022). Effect of Different Surface Treatments on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Resin-Modified CAD/CAM Ceramics. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122311972 ↗
2. A review of dental CAD/CAM: Current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience10.4012/dmj.28.44 ↗
3. Digital dentistry: Innovation for restorative treatment
4. Computerized technology for restorative dentistry
5. Digital vs. conventional implant prosthetic workflows: A cost/time analysis10.1111/clr.12476 ↗
6. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness and Gloss of Feldspathic Ceramic for Chairside CAD/CAM Systems10.2341/15-174-L ↗
7. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials10.11607/ijp.4244 ↗
8. Mechanical properties of resin-ceramic CAD/CAM restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.016 ↗
9. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials10.1016/j.dental.2013.01.002 ↗
10. Resin-composite blocks for dental CAD/CAM applications10.1177/0022034514553976 ↗
11. Evaluation of mechanical and optical behavior of current esthetic dental restorative CAD/CAM composites10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.10.004 ↗
12. Alghamdi, W., Labban, N., Maawadh, A., Alsayed, H., Alshehri, H., Alrahlah, A., and Alnafaiy, S. (2022). Influence of Acidic Environment on the Hardness, Surface Roughness and Wear Ability of CAD/CAM Resin-Matrix Ceramics. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15176146 ↗
13. Hybrid materials offer new perspectives
14. Comparison of three systems for the polishing of an ultra-low fusing dental porcelain10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.07.021 ↗
15. Porcelain surface alterations and refinishing after use of two orthodontic bonding methods10.2319/010909-19.1 ↗
16. Influence of polishing systems on roughness and color change of two dental ceramics10.4047/jap.2019.11.4.215 ↗
17. Effect of surface roughness on flexural strength of veneer ceramics10.1177/154405910308201207 ↗
18. Wear of ceramic and antagonist—A systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.016 ↗
19. Influence of the finishing technique on surface roughness of dental porcelains with different microstructures10.2341/05-104 ↗
20. Surface roughness in ceramics with different finishing techniques using atomic force microscope and profilometer10.2341/05-54 ↗
21. Correlation of surface texture with the stainability of ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.09.028 ↗
22. Reliability of visual and instrumental color matching10.1111/jerd.12321 ↗
23. Comparison of visual shade matching and electronic color measurement device
24. Shen, C., Rawls, H.R., and Esquivel-Upshaw, J.F. (2022). Phillips’ Science of Dental Materials, Elsevier/Saunders. [13th ed.].
25. McCabe, J., and Angus, W. (2008). Applied Dental Materials, Blackwell. [9th ed.].
26. Effect of coarse grinding, overglazing, and 2 polishing systems on the flexural strength, surface roughness, and phase transformation of yttrium-stabilized tetragonal zirconia
27. Effect of Two Polishing Systems on Surface Roughness, Topography, and Flexural Strength of a Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Ceramic10.1111/jopr.12586 ↗
28. Effect of test method on flexural strength of recent dental ceramics10.4012/dmj.23.490 ↗
29. Effects of background color and thickness on the optical properties of CAD-CAM resin-matrix ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.06.009 ↗
30. Influence of thickness and background on the color changes of CAD/CAM dental ceramic restorative materials10.1088/2053-1591/ab9348 ↗
31. Optical behaviors of esthetic CAD-CAM restorations after different surface finishing and polishing procedures and UV aging: An in vitro study10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.09.019 ↗
32. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.06.012 ↗
33. Evaluation of the effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of dental ceramics10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.07.003 ↗
34. Adjusting dental ceramics: An in vitro evaluation of the ability of various ceramic polishing kits to mimic glazed dental ceramic surface10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.007 ↗
35. Effect of Grit-blasting on the Color Stability of Zirconia Ceramics Following Exposure to Beverages
36. Resin-matrix ceramics—An overview
37. Color difference thresholds in dentistry10.1111/jerd.12149 ↗
38. Effects of various polishing techniques and thermal cycling on the surface roughness and color change of polymer-based CAD/CAM materials
39. The Effects of Beverages and Surface Treatments on the Color Stability of 3D-Printed Interim Restorations10.1111/jopr.13377 ↗
40. The effect of surface sealants with different filler content on microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations10.4103/1305-7456.178315 ↗
41. In Vitro Evaluation of Translucency and Color Stability of CAD/CAM Polymer-Infiltrated Ceramic Materials after Accelerated Aging10.1111/jopr.13239 ↗
42. Contribution of postpolymerization conditioning and storage environments to the mechanical properties of three interim restorative materials10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.008 ↗
43. Flexural strength of CAD-CAM and conventional interim resin materials with a surface sealant10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.004 ↗
44. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical properties of two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) ceramic materials10.2341/11-391-L ↗
45. Influence of surface roughness on mechanical strength of resin composite versus glass ceramic materials10.1016/j.dental.2007.05.006 ↗
46. The effect of surface roughness on the Weibull distribution of porcelain strength10.4012/dmj.2009-059 ↗
47. ADM guidance-Ceramics: Guidance to the use of fractography in failure analysis of brittle materials10.1016/j.dental.2017.03.004 ↗
48. Chipping fracture resistance of dental CAD/CAM restorative materials: Part I—Procedures and results10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.010 ↗
49. Surface roughness of flowable resin composites eroded by acidic and alcoholic drinks10.4103/0972-0707.94581 ↗
50. Thermal-cycling, simulated brushing, and beverages induced color changes and roughness of CAD/CAM poly (methyl methacrylate) denture resins10.1088/2053-1591/ac406e ↗
51. Effect of charcoal-based dentifrices on surface roughness of an aged resin composite10.23736/S2724-6329.21.04613-1 ↗