journal article·2025-07-18Open access

Radiomics and Machine Learning Approaches for the Preoperative Classification of In Situ vs. Invasive Breast Cancer Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DCE–MRI)

Luana Conte, Rocco Rizzo, Alessandra Sallustio, Eleonora Maggiulli, Mariangela Capodieci, Francesco Tramacere, Alessandra Castelluccia, Giuseppe Raso, Ugo De Giorgi, Raffaella Massafra, Maurizio Portaluri, Donato Cascio, Giorgio De Nunzio

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 14

Abstract

Accurate preoperative distinction between in situ and invasive Breast Cancer (BC) is critical for clinical decision-making and treatment planning. Radiomics and Machine Learning (ML) have shown promise in enhancing diagnostic performance from breast MRI, yet their application to this specific task remains underexplored. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of several ML classifiers, trained on radiomic features extracted from DCE–MRI and supported by basic clinical information, for the classification of in situ versus invasive BC lesions. In this study, we retrospectively analysed 71 post-contrast DCE–MRI scans (24 in situ, 47 invasive cases). Radiomic features were extracted from manually segmented tumour regions using the PyRadiomics library, and a limited set of basic clinical variables was also included. Several ML classifiers were evaluated in a Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (LOOCV) scheme. Feature selection was performed using two different strategies: Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (MRMR), mutual information. Axial 3D rotation was used for data augmentation. Support Vector Machine (SVM), K Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) were the best-performing models, with an Area Under the Curve (AUC) ranging from 0.77 to 0.81. Notably, KNN achieved the best balance between sensitivity and specificity without the need for data augmentation. Our findings confirm that radiomic features extracted from DCE–MRI, combined with well-validated ML models, can effectively support the differentiation of in situ vs. invasive breast cancer. This approach is quite robust even in small datasets and may aid in improving preoperative planning. Further validation on larger cohorts and integration with additional imaging or clinical data are recommended.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · MRI in cancer diagnosis · AI in cancer detection

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Physics and Chemistry “E. Segrè”, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy

Laboratory of Interdisciplinary Research Applied to Medicine (DReAM), University of Salento & ASL Lecce, 73100 Lecce, Italy

Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy

Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN), 73100 Lecce, Italy

Radiotherapy Unit, ‘Di Summa-Perrino’ Hospital, ASL Brindisi, 72100 Brindisi, Italy

Medical Physics Unit, ‘Di Summa-Perrino’ Hospital, ASL Brindisi, 72100 Brindisi, Italy

Clinical Senology, ‘Di Summa-Perrino’ Hospital, ASL Brindisi, 72100 Brindisi, Italy

Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy

IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy

Radiotherapy Unit, ASST ‘Papa Giovanni XXIII’, 24127 Bergamo, Italy

Laboratory of Biomedical Physics and Environment, Department of Mathematics and Physics “E. De Giorgi”, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy

Funding

European Union—NextGenerationEU

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. (2025, April 30). AIOM-AIRTUM-Siapec-Iap I Numeri Del Cancro in Italia 2024. Available online: https://www.aiom.it/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/2024_NDC_web-def.pdf.
2. Breast-Conserving Treatment with or without Radiotherapy in Ductal Carcinoma-in-Situ: Ten-Year Results of Randomized Phase III Trial10.1200/JCO.2006.06.1366 ↗
3. Detection of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ in Women Undergoing Screening Mammography
4. The Importance of Histologic Type on Breast Cancer Survival10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00366-6 ↗
5. The Impact of Stage and Histology on the Long-Term Clinical Course of 163,808 Patients with Breast Carcinoma10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960415)77:8<1459::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO;2-7 ↗
6. Breast Cancer Prevention: The Key Role of Population Screening, Breast Self-Examination (BSE) and Technological Tools. Survey of Italian Women10.1007/s13187-023-02327-3 ↗
7. A Nationwide Cross-Sectional Study Investigating Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet, Smoking, Alcohol and Work Habits, Hormonal Dynamics between Breast Cancer Cases and Healthy Subjects10.1016/j.nutos.2024.02.007 ↗
8. Cortesi, L., Galli, G.R., Domati, F., Conte, L., Manca, L., Berio, M.A., Toss, A., Iannone, A., and Federico, M. (2021). Obesity in Postmenopausal Breast Cancer Patients: It Is Time to Improve Actions for a Healthier Lifestyle. The Results of a Comparison Between Two Italian Regions with Different “Presumed” Lifestyles. Front. Oncol., 11.10.3389/fonc.2021.769683 ↗
9. Breast Cancer Prevention Practices and Knowledge in Italian and Chinese Women in Italy: Clinical Checkups, Free NHS Screening Adherence, and Breast Self-Examination (BSE)10.1007/s13187-024-02463-4 ↗
10. Conte, L., Lupo, R., Sciolti, S., Lezzi, A., Rubbi, I., Botti, S., Carvello, M., Fanizzi, A., Massafra, R., and Vitale, E. (2024). Exploring the Landscape of Breast Cancer Prevention among Chinese Residents in Italy: An In-Depth Analysis of Screening Adherence, Breast Self-Examination (BSE) Practices, the Role of Technological Tools, and Misconceptions Surrounding Risk Factors and Symptoms. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 21.10.20944/preprints202401.2172.v1 ↗
11. Breast MRI: State of the Art10.1148/radiol.2019182947 ↗
12. Dynamic Image Interpretation of MRI of the Breast10.1002/1522-2586(200012)12:6<965::AID-JMRI23>3.0.CO;2-1 ↗
13. Dynamic Breast MR Imaging: Are Signal Intensity Time Course Data Useful for Differential Diagnosis of Enhancing Lesions?10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap38101 ↗
15. Breast Cancer Imaging with MRI10.1016/S0033-8389(01)00005-7 ↗
16. Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data10.1148/radiol.2015151169 ↗
17. Computer-Aided Lung Nodule Detection in CT: Results of Large-Scale Observer Test10.1016/j.acra.2005.02.041 ↗
18. Computer-Aided Diagnosis as a Second Reader: Spectrum of Findings in CT Studies of the Chest Interpreted as Normal10.1378/chest.128.3.1517 ↗
19. Jalloul, R., Chethan, H.K., and Alkhatib, R. (2023). A Review of Machine Learning Techniques for the Classification and Detection of Breast Cancer from Medical Images. Diagnostics, 13.10.3390/diagnostics13142460 ↗
20. Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques for Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Classification: A Comprehensive Review of Medical Imaging Studies10.1007/s00432-023-04956-z ↗
21. Conte, L., Rizzo, E., Grassi, T., Bagordo, F., De Matteis, E., and De Nunzio, G. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Techniques and Pedigree Charts in Oncogenetics: Towards an Experimental Multioutput Software System for Digitization and Risk Prediction. Computation, 12.10.3390/computation12030047 ↗
22. Deep Learning Applications to Breast Cancer Detection by Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Literature Review10.1186/s13058-023-01687-4 ↗
23. AI in Breast Cancer Imaging: An Update and Future Trends10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2025.01.008 ↗
24. Conte, L., Tafuri, B., Portaluri, M., Galiano, A., Maggiulli, E., and De Nunzio, G. (2020). Breast Cancer Mass Detection in DCE–MRI Using Deep-Learning Features Followed by Discrimination of Infiltrative vs. In Situ Carcinoma through a Machine-Learning Approach. Appl. Sci., 10.10.20944/preprints202008.0179.v1 ↗
25. Conte, L., Rizzo, E., Civino, E., Tarantino, P., De Nunzio, G., and De Matteis, E. (2024). Enhancing Breast Cancer Risk Prediction with Machine Learning: Integrating BMI, Smoking Habits, Hormonal Dynamics, and BRCA Gene Mutations—A Game-Changer Compared to Traditional Statistical Models?. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188474 ↗
26. Predicting Underestimation of Invasive Cancer in Patients with Core-Needle-Biopsy-Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Using Deep Learning Algorithms10.3390/tomography9010001 ↗
27. Parmar, C., Grossmann, P., Bussink, J., Lambin, P., and Aerts, H.J.W.L. (2015). Machine Learning Methods for Quantitative Radiomic Biomarkers. Sci. Rep., 5.10.3389/fonc.2015.00272 ↗
28. Radiomics Investigation in the Distinction between in Situ and Invasive Breast Cancers10.1118/1.4925588 ↗
29. Predicting Underestimation of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: A Comparison between Radiomics and Conventional Approaches10.1007/s11548-018-1900-x ↗
30. Combined Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Reading Adapted to the “Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System” for Multiparametric 3-T Imaging of Breast Lesions10.1007/s00330-013-2771-8 ↗
31. MRI-Only Lesions: Application of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Obviates Unnecessary MR-Guided Breast Biopsies10.1007/s00330-014-3153-6 ↗
32. Quantitative Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Noninvasive Imaging Biomarker for the Differentiation of Invasive Breast Cancer and Ductal Carcinoma in Situ10.1097/RLI.0000000000000104 ↗
33. Cancerous Breast Lesions on Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images: Computerized Characterization for Image-Based Prognostic Markers10.1148/radiol.09090838 ↗
34. Zhu, Z., Harowicz, M., Zhang, J., Saha, A., Grimm, L.J., Hwang, E.S., and Mazurowski, M.A. (2019). Deep Learning Analysis of Breast MRIs for Prediction of Occult Invasive Disease in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. Comput. Biol. Med., 115.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103498 ↗