Measuring the Circularity of Bio-Based Fertilizers: Applying the BIORADAR Product Circularity Monitoring Framework
Source abstract
Abstract
The transition to the circular economy (CE) is one of the EU’s current strategic policies to improve its competitiveness and sustainability. While the EU has developed a framework for monitoring overall progress toward the CE, there are gaps in monitoring specific priority sectors, such as the bioeconomy. In order to support industry and policymakers in this sector, this paper presents the application of the BIORADAR’s product circularity monitoring framework to five bio-based fertilizers. The framework is composed of two publicly available indicators: the circular index and the circularity indicator of nutrient; and two new indicator proposals: the biodegradable content and the nutrient slow-release index. Making use of life cycle inventories and supplementary data from the scientific literature, these four indicators were calculated for algae biomass, compost, feather meal, spent mushroom substrate, and wood vinegar. The framework proved to be useful for measuring the circularity at the product level for bio-based fertilizers, especially shedding light on the virgin non-renewable materials consumption, waste generation, biodegradability, nutrient recovery process efficiency, and nutrient release speed. It constitutes the first approach to measuring circularity tailored to bio-based fertilizer. By incorporating it into eco-design, innovation, and managerial decision-making processes, key stakeholders can rely on guiding metrics to support their transition toward higher circularity levels.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development · Sustainable Industrial Ecology · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centro Tecnológico de la Energía y el Medio Ambiente (CETENMA), 30353 Cartagena, Spain
Facultade de Ciencias Económicas e Empresariais, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Grupo ICEDE, Departamento de Economía Aplicada, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Funding
Circular Bio-based Europe Joint Undertaking (CBE JU) under the European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation program
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. Johnson, K. (2023). Strenghtening Sustainability in the Fertilizer Industry, International Financial Corporation.
2. European Commission (2012). Directorate General for Research and Innovation. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe, LU Publications Office.
3. European Commission (2025). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of Regions: A Competitiveness Compass for the EU, European Commission.
4. The circular bioeconomy: Its elements and role in European bioeconomy clusters
5. Draghi, M. (2024). A Competitiveness Strategy for Europe, European Commission.
6. European Commission (2025). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The Clean Industrial Deal: A Joint Roadmap for Competitiveness and Decarbonization, European Commission.
7. A systematic approach to understanding and quantifying the EU’s bioeconomy
8. The World Bank (2022). Squaring the Circle: Policies from Europe’s Circular Economy Transition, The World Bank.
9. Fernández-Gutiérrez, D., Argüelles, A., Castejón Martínez, G., Soriano Disla, J.M., and Lara-Guillén, A.J. (2022). Unlocking New Value from Urban Biowaste: LCA of the VALUEWASTE Biobased Products. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su142214962 ↗
10. Chojnacka, K., Moustakas, K., and Witek-Krowiak, A. (2020). Bio-based fertilizers: A practical approach towards circular economy. Bioresour. Technol., 295.10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122223 ↗
11. Soil and land management in a circular economy10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.137 ↗
12. Smol, M., Marcinek, P., Andrunik, M., and Szołdrowska, D. (2023). Report on Drivers and Barriers Regarding the Replacement of Conventional Fertilisers by Bio-Based Fertilisers (BBFs) for All Stakeholders in the Value Chain, LEX4BIO Project; European Commission.
13. Rotmans, J., Loorbach, D., and Kemp, R. (2007). Transition Management: Origin, Evolution, Critique, Erasmus Research Institute of Management.
14. The regenerative supply chain: A framework for developing circular economy indicators10.1080/00207543.2018.1524166 ↗
15. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). Towards a Circular Economy: Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition, Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
16. The Circular Economy: The Butterfly Diagram, Systems Theory and the Economic Pluriverse
17. Vural Gursel, I., Elbersen, B., Meesters, K.P.H., and Van Leeuwen, M. (2022). Defining Circular Economy Principles for Biobased Products. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su141912780 ↗
18. Monitoring circular biobased economy—Systematic review of circularity indicators at the micro level10.1016/j.resconrec.2023.107104 ↗
19. Toivanen, I. (2024). Application of Circularity Indicators to Bio-Based Products—Testing the New ISO 59020 Framework on Product Level in a Case Study, Aalto University.
20. Circular economy monitoring—How to make it apt for biological cycles? Resources10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105563 ↗
21. Cámara, M., Iglesias, H., and Paredes, A. (2024). D2.1 Report on Identification of Circularity Indicators Methodologies for Industrial Bio-Based Systems, Biorefine Cluster of European. BIORADAR.
22. Enel (2018). Circulability Model. Methodological Approach, Enel.
23. Economics of Enhancing Nutrient Circularity in an Organic Waste Valorization System10.1021/acs.est.8b06035 ↗
24. Iglesias, H., and Paredes Ortiz, A. (2025). D2.2. Report on Evaluation of Existing/New Metrics on Circularity for Industrial Bio-Based Systems and Propositions of New Indicators, Biorefine Cluster Of European. BIORADAR.
25. Blasco-Lavilla, N., and Fernández-Gutiérrez, D. (2023). D1.1. Report on Identification of Bio Industrial Bio-Based Value Systems for Project Analysis, Biorefine Cluster Of European. BIORADAR.
26. DREVEN (2025). Life Cycle Inventories of Feather Meal Produced and Used as Circular Fertiliser in Three European Regions, Zenodo.
27. CETENMA (2025). Life Cycle Inventories of Compost Produced and Used as Circular Fertiliser in Three European Regions, Zenodo.
28. CETENMA (2024). Life Cycle Inventories of Spent Mushroom Substrate Produced and Used as Circular Fertiliser in Three European Regions, Zenodo.
29. Brassard, P., Godbout, S., Palacios, J.H., Le Roux, É., Alvarez-Chavez, B.J., Raghavan, V., and Hamelin, L. (2019, January 27–30). Bio-based products from woody biomass pyrolysis for a sustainable bioeconomy. Proceedings of the 27th European Biomass Conference (EUBCE)-Setting the Course for a Biobased Economy, Lisbon, Portugal.
30. Framework for consequential life cycle assessment of pyrolysis biorefineries: A case study for the conversion of primary forestry residues10.1016/j.rser.2020.110549 ↗
31. Pérez Riesgo, L. (2016). Valorización de Residuos Biomásicos de Poda Forestal en Energía y Medio Ambiente. [Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Oviedo].
32. A mini review of the specialties of the bio-oils produced from pyrolysis of 20 different biomasses10.1016/j.rser.2019.109313 ↗
33. Fast pyrolysis of eucalyptus waste in a conical spouted bed reactor10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.030 ↗
34. Velázquez Martí, B., Gaibor-Chávez, J., Franco Rodríguez, J.E., and López Cortés, I. (2023). Biomass Identification from Proximate Analysis: Characterization of Residual Vegetable Materials in Andean Areas. Agronomy, 13.10.3390/agronomy13092347 ↗
35. Sudarshana, P., Nageswara-Rao, M., and Soneji, J.R. (2018). Physicochemistry and Utilization of Wood Vinegar from Carbonization of Tropical Biomass Waste. Tropical Forests—New Edition, InTech.10.5772/intechopen.69876 ↗
36. Life cycle assessment and techno-economic analysis for biofuel and biofertilizer recovery as by-products from microalgae10.1016/j.rser.2023.113781 ↗
37. Life cycle assessment of high rate algal ponds for wastewater treatment and resource recovery10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.051 ↗
38. Hasler, K. (2017). Environmental Impact of Mineral Fertilizers: Possible Improvements Through the Adoption of Eco-Innovations, Wageningen University.
39. Production of poultry feather hydrolysate using HCl and NaOH as a growth medium substrate for indigenous strains
40. Vavrova, K., Wimmerova, L., Knapek, J., Weger, J., Keken, Z., Kastanek, F., and Solcova, O. (2022). Waste Feathers Processing to Liquid Fertilizers for Sustainable Agriculture—LCA, Economic Evaluation, and Case Study. Processes, 10.10.3390/pr10122478 ↗
41. Feather hydrolysate as a promising nitrogen-rich fertilizer for greenhouse lettuce cultivation10.1007/s40093-019-0281-7 ↗
42. Niedziński, T., Sierra, M.J., Łabętowicz, J., Noras, K., Cabrales, C., and Millán, R. (2021). Release of Nitrogen from Granulate Mineral and Organic Fertilizers and Its Effect on Selected Chemical Parameters of Soil. Agronomy, 11.10.3390/agronomy11101981 ↗
43. Data quality management for life cycle inventories—An example of using data quality indicators10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1 ↗
44. CETAQUA (2024). D2.1 Report on Data Collection, FER-PLAY.
45. European Commission (2019). Suggestions for Updating the Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Method, Publications Office.
46. Eurostat (2014). Coal (Solid Fossil Fuels and Manufactured Gases) Annual Questionnaire, Eurostat.
47. The Engineering Toolbox (2024, November 06). Gases—Gross and Net Heat Values 2003. Available online: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/gross-net-heating-values-d_420.html.
48. Foro Nuclear (2024, November 06). ¿Cuánta energía en kWh se Extrae de un kg de Uranio y qué Rendimiento tiene cada kilo?. Available online: https://www.foronuclear.org/descubre-la-energia-nuclear/preguntas-y-respuestas/sobre-combustible-nuclear/cuanta-energia-en-kwh-se-extrae-de-un-kilo-de-uranio-y-que-rendimiento-tiene-cada-kilo/.
49. (2024, November 06). The Engineering Toolbox. Fossil vs. Alternative Fuels-Energy Content 2008. Available online: https://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/fossil-fuels-energy-content-d_1298.html.
50. Qin, Y. (2019). Characterizing Uncertainties in Life Cycle Assessment, University of California.
51. Kupfer, T., Baitz, M., Colodel, C.M., Kokborg, M., Schöll, S., Rudolf, M., Thellier, L., Gonzalez, M., Schuller, O., and Hengstler, J. (2012). GaBi Database & Modelling Principles 2012, PE International AG.
52. Evaluación de los parámetros de calidad para la determinación de nitrógeno total en suelos10.53287/tuov3244ge80j ↗
53. Estimación de la incertidumbre de la medición para la determinación de proteínas en alimentos por el método de Kjeldahl
54. Hughes, I., and Hase, T.P.A. (2010). Measurements and Their Uncertainties: A Practical Guide to Modern Error Analysis, Oxford University Press.
55. Fantner, G. (2025, June 24). A Brief Introduction to Error Analysis and Propagation. Available online: https://www.epfl.ch/labs/lben/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Error-Propagation_2013.pdf.
56. GHG Protocol (2025, July 02). GHG Protocol Guidance on Uncertainty Assessment in GHG Inventories and Calculating Statistical Parameter Uncertainty. Available online: https://ghgprotocol.org/sites/default/files/2023-03/ghg-uncertainty.pdf.
57. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2025, June 27). Material Circularity Indicator (MCI). Ellen MacArthur Foundation 2015. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/material-circularity-indicator.
58. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2025, June 27). Circular Transition Indicators v4.0. World Business Council for Sustainable Development 2023. Available online: https://www.wbcsd.org/resources/circular-transition-indicators-v4/.
59. Measuring the performance of more circular complex product supply chains. Resource10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104608 ↗
60. (2024). Circular Economy—Measuring and Assessing Circularity Performance (Standard No. ISO 59020:2024).
61. (2021). Sustainability of construction works. Environmental product declarations. Core rules for the product category of construction products (Standard No. UNE-EN 15804:2012).
62. Bio-based agricultural products: A sustainable alternative to agrochemicals for promoting a circular economy10.1039/D3SU00075C ↗
63. Cómo la bioeconomía circular es una solución integral para cuidar la casa en común
64. (2001). Requirements for Packaging Recoverable Through Composting and Biodegradation—Test Scheme and Evaluation Criteria for the Final Acceptance of Packaging (Standard No. EN 13432:2001).
65. European Commission (2025, May 06). Waste Framework Directive n.d. Available online: https://environment.ec.europa.eu/topics/waste-and-recycling/waste-framework-directive_en.
66. Rafique, M.I., Al-Wabel, M.I., Al-Farraj, A.S.F., Ahmad, M., Aouak, T., Al-Swadi, H.A., and Mousa, M.A. (2025). Incorporation of biochar and semi-interpenetrating biopolymer to synthesize new slow release fertilizers and their impact on soil moisture and nutrients availability. Sci. Rep., 15.10.1038/s41598-025-90367-8 ↗
67. Efecto de abonos de liberación lenta en la lixiviación de nitratos y nutrición nitrogenada en estevia10.17584/rcch.2015v9i1.3750 ↗
68. Antwi, R.A., Chappell, C., Twumasi, Y.A., Anning, D.K., Oppong, J., Annan, J.B., Ahoma, G., Atayi, J., and Ferchaud, V. (2024). Fertility and management strategies of soils in rural and urban forest ecosystems: A review of selected rural and urban forests in Ghana and USA. Geol. Ecol. Landsc., 1–12.10.1080/24749508.2024.2334512 ↗
69. A dynamic optimization of soil phosphorus status approach could reduce phosphorus fertilizer use by half in China10.1038/s41467-025-56178-1 ↗
70. Generalized solutions for advection–dispersion transport equations subject to time- and space-dependent internal and boundary sources10.1016/j.compgeo.2024.106944 ↗
71. Towards a circular nutrient economy. A novel way to analyze the circularity of nutrient flows in food systems. Resources10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105693 ↗
72. Brandão, M., Lazarevic, D., and Finnveden, G. (2020). 27. The circular nutrient economy: Needs and potentials of nutrient recycling. Handbook of the Circular Economy, Edward Elgar Publishing.10.4337/9781788972727 ↗
73. Hybridised sustainability metrics for use in life cycle assessment of bio-based products: Resource efficiency and circularity10.1039/C9GC02992C ↗
74. Twelve years of quality assurance system on compost in Italy. Procedia Environmental Science
75. Centemero, M., and Zanardi, W. (2008, January 27–29). The Voluntary Certification Processes About the Compost and the Compostable Products in Italy. Compost and Digestate: Sustainability, Benefits, Impacts for the Environment and for Plant Production, Proceedings of the International Congress CODIS 2008, Solothurn, Switzerland.
76. Renewable Energy Assurance Ltd (2025, July 01). Biofertiliser Certification Scheme. Biofertiliser Certification Scheme. Available online: https://www.biofertiliser.org.uk/.
77. United States Department of Agriculture (2025, July 01). Voluntary Labeling Initiative n.d, Available online: https://www.biopreferred.gov/BioPreferred/faces/pages/AboutLabel.xhtml.
78. BIORADAR (2025, July 01). A Dynamic Database of Standards for the Bioeconomy. BIORADAR 2025. Available online: https://www.bioradar.org/bioeconomy-standards-database.
79. (2020). Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 June 2020 on the Establishment of a Framework to Facilitate Sustainable Investment, and Amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088, Official Journal of European Union.