Research on the Seismic Performance of Precast RCS Composite Joints Considering the Floor Slab Effect
Source abstract
Abstract
Under the impetus of achieving global sustainable development goals, the civil construction industry is accelerating its transition towards high-quality, green, and low-carbon practices. Prefabricated, modular building technology has become a key tool due to its advantages in energy conservation, emission reduction, and shortened construction periods. However, existing research on the seismic performance of prefabricated, modular, reinforced concrete column–beam (RCS) composite structures often focuses on the construction form of beam–column joints, paying less attention to the impact of floor slabs on the seismic performance of joints during earthquakes. This may make joints a weak link in structural systems’ seismic performance. To address this issue, this paper designs a prefabricated, modular RCS composite joint considering the effect of floor slabs and uses the finite element software ABAQUS 2023 to perform a quasi-static analysis of the joint. The reliability of the method is verified through comparisons with the experimental data. This study examines various aspects, including the joint design and the material’s constitutive relationship settings, focusing on the influence of parameters, such as the axial compression ratio and floor slab concrete strength, on the joint seismic performance. It concludes that the seismic performance of the prefabricated, modular RCS composite joints considering the effect of floor slabs is significantly improved. Considering the composite effect of the slabs, the yield loads in the positive and negative directions for node FJD-0 increased by 78.9% and 70.0%, respectively, compared to that of the slab-free node RCSJ3. The ultimate bearing capacities improved by 13.2% and 9.98%, respectively, and the energy dissipation capacity increased by 23%. Additionally, the variation in the axial load ratio has multiple effects on the seismic performance of the joints. Increasing the slab thickness significantly enhances the seismic performance of the joints under positive loading. The bolt pre-tensioning force has a crucial impact on improving the bearing capacity and overall stiffness of the joints. The reinforcement ratio of the slabs has a notable effect on the seismic performance of the joints under negative loading, while the concrete strength of the slabs has a relatively minor impact on the seismic performance of the joints. Therefore, the reasonable design of these parameters can optimize the seismic performance of joints, providing a theoretical basis and recommendations for engineering application and optimization.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
College of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Northeast Forestry University, Harbin 150040, China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. Jayawardana, J., Sandanayake, M., Jayasinghe, J., Kulatunga, A.K., and Zhang, G. (2025). Sustainability Drivers and Sustainable Development Goals-Based Indicator System for Prefabricated Construction Adoption—A Case of Developing Economies. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15071037 ↗
2. Method and application of global building operation energy use and carbon emissions comparison in the context of carbon neutrality
3. Mostafaei, H., Ashoori Barmchi, M., and Bahmani, H. (2025). Seismic Resilience and Sustainability: A Comparative Analysis of Steel and Reinforced Structures. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15101613 ↗
4. Differential Interferometry, Structural Lineaments and Terrain Deformation Analysis Applied in Zero Zone 2016 Earthquake (Manta, Ecuador)10.1007/s12665-019-8517-4 ↗
5. Seismic Performance and Collapse Analysis of RC Framed-Wall Structure Excited with Turkey/Syria Destructive Earthquake10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105774 ↗
6. A New Method for CDP Input Parameter Identification of the ABAQUS Software Guaranteeing Uniqueness and Precision10.1108/IJSI-03-2016-0010 ↗
7. Seismic Response of Exterior RC Column-to-Steel Beam Connections10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1113) ↗
8. Modeling Shear Behavior of Hybrid RCS Beam-Column Connections10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2001)127:1(3) ↗
9. Seismic Behavior of Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Columns with Consideration of Floor Combination
10. Experimental study on seismic performance of concrete-filled double steel tubular column composite connections with high strength blind bolts
11. Anti-collapse performance of beam-column substructures based on the composite effect of floor slabs
12. Seismic Performance of Composite RCS Special Moment Frames10.1007/s12205-013-1431-5 ↗
13. Effects of Bolt Preload on Plate Fretting Behavior of 2024 Aluminum Alloy Laminates Based on Numerical Model
14. A practical approach for estimating the floor deformability in existing RC buildings: Evaluation of the effects in the structural response and seismic fragility10.1007/s10518-019-00774-2 ↗
15. Acceleration demands in single-storey RC buildings with flexible diaphragms10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.115276 ↗
16. Performance-based seismic design method for buildings:Discussion on application of “general rule for performance based seismic design of buildings” To design of buildings
17. (2003). Standard for Mechanical Properties Test of Ordinary Concrete (Standard No. GB/T 50081—2002).
18. (2002). Method for Tensile Test of Metal Materials at Room Temperature (Standard No. GB/T 228—2002).
19. A Peridynamic Plastic Model Based on von Mises Criteria with Isotropic, Kinematic and Mixed Hardenings under Cyclic Loading10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.03.033 ↗
20. State-of-the-Art of Macroscopic Constitutive Models of Concrete
21. (2010). Code for Design of Concrete Structures (Standard No. GB 50010—2010).
22. Anisotropic Damage Modelling for Brittle Elastic Materials
23. Abramowicz, M., and Pełka-Sawenko, A. (2024). Comparison of the Finite Element Method and Rigid Finite Element Method During Dynamic Calculations of Steel–Concrete Composite Beams Based on Experimental Results. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17246081 ↗
24. (2010). Seismic Design Code for Buildings (Standard No. GB50011-2010).
25. (2016). Code for Design of Composite Structures (Standard No. JGJ 138—2016).
26. Experimental Study on Anchorage Performance and Mechanism of Hooked Bars with a Pre-Yield Anchorage Failure10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105067 ↗
27. Furukawa, S., Iwami, R., and Kimura, Y. (2025). Development of an Environmentally Friendly Steel Structural Framework: Evaluation of Bending Stiffness and Yield Bending Moment of Cross-Laminated Timber Slab–H-Shaped Steel Composite Beams for Component Reuse. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17052073 ↗
28. (2011). Technical Specification for High Strength Bolted Connections in Steel Structures (Standard No. JGJ 82—2011).
29. Optimization Study of Strengthened T-Shaped Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular (CFST) Column-Steel Beam Joint10.1016/j.jcsr.2024.109020 ↗
30. Study on Seismic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Column-Steel Beam Side Joints10.1080/13467581.2020.1747472 ↗
31. Optimizing the Location of Supports under a Monolithic Floor Slab10.3390/civileng5020026 ↗
32. Yu, S.J., Chen, S.S., Zhou, F., Liu, J.M., Wu, C.L., and Wang, P.F. (2021). Analysis of the influence of axial compression ratio on the seismic performance of assembled SRC column to composite beam joints. Concrete, 116–122.