Spatial Estimation of Biogas and Compost Potential for Sustainable Livestock Manure Management in Bangladesh
Source abstract
Abstract
A significant amount of livestock manure is generated in Bangladesh, creating challenges for sustainable manure management. Bioenergy and organic fertilizer production from manure are expected to provide opportunities for renewable resources, including environmental benefits. Therefore, this research aimed to spatially assess the potential of manure for biogas and compost using GIS (geographic information system) symbology and hot spot analyses, based on theoretical estimations. This study identified hot spots for biogas and compost production from various types of livestock manure at the district and sub-district levels, whereas previous studies have only explored these at a national level. The estimated total biogas and compost potential was approximately 15,035.50 million m3 and 67.36 million tons, respectively, from livestock manure in 2024, distinguishing it as a feasible alternative to fossil fuels for electricity generation and synthetic fertilizers for crop production. Overall, the regional pattern maps of the socio-economic potential, hot spot identification, and environmental benefits assessments of manure will provide a more localized approach to planning sustainable manure management strategies for biogas and compost production in Bangladesh.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production · Agriculture, Water, and Health · Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Doctoral Program in Environmental Studies, Degree Programs in Life and Earth Sciences, Graduate School of Science and Technology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan
References (98)
Show source-provided references
1. DLS (2025, January 16). Livestock Economy at a Glance, Available online: http://dls.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dls.portal.gov.bd/page/ee5f4621_fa3a_40ac_8bd9_898fb8ee4700/2023-07-23-12-04-afbcccb96f8b27d4bab6501aa8c2c2ff.pdf.
2. FAO (2020). Livestock and Environment Statistics: Manure and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Global, Regional and Country Trends, 1990-2018, FAO. Available online: https://openknowledge.fao.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/f0cebfdd-725e-4d7a-8e14-3ba8fb1486a7/content.
3. Searchinger, T., Waite, R., Hanson, C., and Ranganathan, J. (2019). Creating a Sustainable Food Future “A Menu of Solutions to Feed Nearly 10 Billion People by 2050”, World Reaserch Institute. Available online: https://agritrop.cirad.fr/593176/1/WRR_Food_Full_Report_0.pdf.
4. Mahal, Z., Yabar, H., and Mizunoya, T. (2024). Spatial Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Eutrophication Potential from Livestock Manure in Bangladesh. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135479 ↗
5. Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock (2019). ILMM Draft National Integrated Livestock Manure Management (ILMM) Policy, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock.
6. BLRI (2025, May 27). Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute, Available online: https://blri.gov.bd/.
7. MoEF (2024, May 01). The National Environment Policy, Available online: https://moef.gov.bd/site/page/1c05e31e-1bb0-46ce-95a3-6ee3c82b439f/%E0%A6%AA%E0%A6%B0%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%AC%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B6-%E0%A6%A8%E0%A7%80%E0%A6%A4%E0%A6%BF,%E0%A6%86%E0%A6%87%E0%A6%A8-%E0%A6%93-%E0%A6%AC%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%A7%E0%A6%BF.
8. Legislative and Parliamentary Affairs Division Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs (2024, September 12). Laws of Bangladesh, Available online: http://bdlaws.minlaw.gov.bd/laws-of-bangladesh.html?lang=en.
9. Renewable energy recovery potential towards sustainable cattle manure management in Buenos Aires Province: Site selection based on GIS spatial analysis and statistics10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.098 ↗
10. Mahal, Z., and Yabar, H. (2025). A Spatial Modeling Approach for Optimizing the Locations of Large-Scale Biogas Plants from Livestock Manure in Bangladesh. Land, 14.10.3390/land14010079 ↗
11. Application of GIS in Introducing Community-Based Biogas Plants from Dairy Farm Waste: Potential of Renewable Energy for Rural Areas in Bangladesh10.3390/geomatics4040021 ↗
12. Siddiki, S.Y.A., Uddin, M.N., Mofijur, M., Fattah, I.M.R., Ong, H.C., Lam, S.S., Kumar, P.S., and Ahmed, S.F. (2021). Theoretical calculation of biogas production and greenhouse gas emission reduction potential of livestock, poultry and slaughterhouse waste in Bangladesh. J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 9.10.1016/j.jece.2021.105204 ↗
13. Chowdhury, T., Chowdhury, H., Hossain, N., Ahmed, A., Hossen, M.S., Chowdhury, P., Thirugnanasambandam, M., and Saidur, R. (2020). Latest advancements on livestock waste management and biogas production: Bangladesh’s perspective. J. Clean. Prod., 272.10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122818 ↗
14. Lei, Z., Zhan, X., and Lee, D.J. (2020). Recent advancements in sustainable management of livestock waste and rural environment (LSW-2020). Bioresour. Technol., 316.10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123958 ↗
15. Mary, A.K. (2024, May 24). Composting Animal Manures: A Guide to the Process and Management of Animal Manure Compost|NDSU Agriculture 2022. Available online: https://www.ndsu.edu/agriculture/extension/publications/composting-animal-manures-guide-process-and-management-animal-manure-compost.
16. The Role of Animal Manure in Sustainable Soil Fertility Management in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Review10.1300/J064v25n02_09 ↗
17. Linking Wisconsin Dairy and Grain Farms via Manure Transfer for Corn Production10.2134/agronj2008.0126 ↗
18. Finance Division, Ministry of Finance (2024, May 02). Economic Review, Available online: https://mof.portal.gov.bd/site/page/28ba57f5-59ff-4426-970a-bf014242179e/Bangladesh-Economic-Review.
19. Islam, K.N., Sarker, T., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., Atri, A.C., and Alam, M.S. (2021). Renewable energy generation from livestock waste for a sustainable circular economy in Bangladesh. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 139.10.1016/j.rser.2020.110695 ↗
20. Nehra, M., and Jain, S. (2023). Estimation of renewable biogas energy potential from livestock manure: A case study of India. Bioresour. Technol. Rep., 22.10.1016/j.biteb.2023.101432 ↗
21. Afotey, B., and Sarpong, G.T. (2022). Estimation of biogas production potential and greenhouse gas emissions reduction for sustainable energy management using intelligent computing technique. Meas. Sens., 25.10.1016/j.measen.2022.100650 ↗
22. Miranda, D.S., and Kulay, L. (2022). A prospective study on the environmental feasibility of supplying electricity to the Brazilian Amazon through biogas power generation. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 55.10.1016/j.seta.2022.102962 ↗
23. Deublein, D., and Steinhauser, A. (2008). Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources: An Introduction, Wiley. [1st ed.].10.1002/9783527621705 ↗
24. Mayerová, M., Šimon, T., Stehlík, M., Madaras, M., Koubová, M., and Smatanová, M. (2023). Long-term application of biogas digestate improves soil physical properties. Soil Tillage Res., 231.10.1016/j.still.2023.105715 ↗
25. Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollutant Emissions from Composting10.1021/acs.est.2c05846 ↗
26. Improving the sustainability of organic waste management practices in the food-energy-water nexus: A comparative review of anaerobic digestion and composting10.1016/j.rser.2018.03.025 ↗
27. (2024, November 13). ArcGIS Online 2024. Available online: https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=arcgis+online.
28. DLS (2024, April 24). Department of Livestock Services 2024, Available online: https://dls.gov.bd/.
29. Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia10.1016/j.rser.2016.01.117 ↗
30. An investigation of biogas production potential from livestock and slaughterhouse wastes10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.016 ↗
31. Status and potential of biogas energy from animal wastes in Turkey10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.006 ↗
32. Deublein, D., and Steinhauser, A. (2010). Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources. Biogas from Waste and Renewable Resources, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.10.1002/9783527632794 ↗
33. Feasibility analysis of implementing anaerobic digestion as a potential energy source in Bangladesh10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.094 ↗
34. Ni–Co bimetallic catalyst for hydrogen production in sewage treatment plants: Biogas reforming and tars removal10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.06.163 ↗
35. Garcia, A.P. (2024, December 29). Techno-Economic Feasibility Study of a Small-Scale Biogas Plant for Treating Market Waste in the City of El Alto KTH School of Industrial Engineering and Management Energy Technology EGI-2014-083MSC Division of Energy and Climate SE-100 44 STOCKHOLM. Available online: http://kth.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:741758/FULLTEXT01.pdf.
36. Potential of Organic Waste for Biogas and Biofertilizer Production in Nigeria10.5755/j01.erem.63.1.2912 ↗
37. Anaerobic digestion technology in livestock manure treatment for biogas production: A review10.1002/elsc.201100150 ↗
38. Biogas production potential from livestock manure in Iran10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.190 ↗
39. Calculating the Reduction in Material Mass And Volume during Composting10.1080/1065657X.2004.10702206 ↗
40. Estimation of Potential Supply of Livestock Waste Compost to Replace Chemical Fertilizer Use in Japan Based on 2000 Census of Agriculture10.6090/jarq.39.83 ↗
41. DAE (2024, July 09). Department of Agricultural Extension-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh 2024, Available online: https://dae.gov.bd/.
42. Addition of cattle manure to sheep bedding allows vermicomposting process and improves vermicompost quality10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.024 ↗
43. Hossain, Z., Bahar, M., Sarkar, B., Donne, S.W., Wade, P., and Bolan, N. (2021). Assessment of the fertilizer potential of biochars produced from slow pyrolysis of biosolid and animal manures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 155.10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105043 ↗
44. Brown, C. (2013). Available Nutrients and Value for Manure, The Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food and the Ministry of Rural Affairs. Available online: https://fieldcropnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Nutrient-Value-of-Manure.pdf.
45. Leikam, D.F., and Lamond, R.E. (2003). Estimating Manure Nutrient Availability Report, No.: MF-2562, Kansas State University, Department of Agronomy. Available online: https://bookstore.ksre.ksu.edu/download/estimating-manure-nutrient-availability_MF2562.
46. Raza, S.T., Tang, J.L., Ali, Z., Yao, Z., Bah, H., Iqbal, H., and Ren, X. (2020). Ammonia Volatilization and Greenhouse Gases Emissions during Vermicomposting with Animal Manures and Biochar to Enhance Sustainability. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18.10.3390/ijerph18010178 ↗
47. Composting as a cleaner strategy to broiler agro-industrial wastes: Selecting carbon source to optimize the process and improve the quality of the final compost10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.075 ↗
48. Potential use of anaerobically digested manure slurry to suppress Phytophthora root rot of chilli pepper10.1016/j.scienta.2013.11.004 ↗
49. The potential of digestate as a biofertilizer in eroded soils of Lithuania10.1016/j.wasman.2019.11.008 ↗
50. Assessment of biofertilizer quality and health implications of anaerobic digestion effluent of cow dung and chicken droppings10.1016/j.renene.2013.09.049 ↗
51. Ezemagu, I., Ejimofor, M., Menkiti, M., and Diyoke, C. (2021). Biofertilizer production via composting of digestate obtained from anaerobic digestion of post biocoagulation sludge blended with saw dust: Physiochemical characterization and kinetic study. Environ. Chall., 5.10.1016/j.envc.2021.100288 ↗
52. Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy—A life cycle perspective10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.124 ↗
53. The Carbon Footprint of a Biogas Power Plant10.30638/eemj.2014.322 ↗
54. Economic and environmental assessment of electricity generation using biogas from organic fraction of municipal solid waste for the city of Ibadan, Nigeria10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.282 ↗
55. IPCC (2024, May 28). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. Available online: https://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html.
56. Renewable and sustainable energy use in Turkey: A review10.1016/S1364-0321(01)00007-7 ↗
57. Viswanathan, B. (2017). Chapter 3—Natural Gas. Energy Sources Amsterdam, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-444-56353-8.00003-4 ↗
58. Methane and NOx Emissions from Natural Gas Stoves, Cooktops, and Ovens in Residential Homes10.1021/acs.est.1c04707 ↗
59. Greenhouse gas emissions from home composting of organic household waste10.1016/j.wasman.2010.07.004 ↗
60. Greenhouse gas emissions from mechanical and biological waste treatment of municipal waste10.1080/09593330309385611 ↗
61. Carbon, Nitrogen Balances and Greenhouse Gas Emission during Cattle Feedlot Manure Composting10.2134/jeq2004.3700 ↗
62. Emission of Nitrous Oxide and other Trace Gases during Composting of Grass and Green Waste10.1006/jaer.1997.0257 ↗
63. Life cycle assessment of fertilizers: A review10.2478/intag-2013-0032 ↗
64. Carbon Emissions and Sequestration from Fertilization of Pine in the Southeastern United States
65. Brentrup, F., Hoxha, A., and Christensen, B. (2016, January 19–21). Carbon footprint analysis of mineral fertilizer production in Europe and other world regions. Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Life Cycle Assessment of Food (LCA Food 2016), Dublin, Ireland.
66. Davis, J., and Haglund, C. (1999). Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) of Fertiliser Production: Fertiliser Products Used in Sweden and Western Europe, SIK.
67. Environmental burdens of producing bread wheat, oilseed rape and potatoes in England and Wales using simulation and system modelling10.1007/s11367-010-0212-3 ↗
68. Life cycle assessment of potash fertilizer production in China10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.07.028 ↗
69. GHG emission factors developed for the recycling and composting of municipal waste in South African municipalities10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.010 ↗
70. Phong, N.T. (2012). Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Composting and Anaerobic Digestion Plants. Vietnam. J. Sci. Technol., 54.10.15625/2525-2518/54/4B/12043 ↗
71. Pile mixing increases greenhouse gas emissions during composting of dairy manure10.1016/j.biortech.2010.10.142 ↗
72. Luske, B. (2010). Reduced GHG Emissions Due to Compost Production and Compost Use in Egypt Comparing Two Scenarios, Louis Bolk Instituu. Available online: https://orgprints.org/id/eprint/17480/4/17480.pdf.
73. McDougall, F.R., White, P., Franke, M., and Hindle, P. (2001). Integrated Solid Waste Management: A Life Cycle Inventory, Blackwell Science.10.1002/9780470999677 ↗
74. Effects of rainfall intensity fluctuations on infiltration and runoff: Rainfall simulation on dryland soils, Fowlers Gap, Australia10.1002/hyp.8317 ↗
75. Jin, Z., Guo, L., Yu, Y., Luo, D., Fan, B., and Chu, G. (2020). Storm runoff generation in headwater catchments on the Chinese Loess Plateau after long-term vegetation rehabilitation. Sci. Total. Environ., 748.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141375 ↗
76. Zhong, S., Tian, X., Geng, Y., Santagata, R., Zhuang, M., Chen, W., Yang, S., and Ulgiati, S. (2022). Sustainability assessment in the anthropocentric watershed based on emergy and decomposition methods: A case study of Erhai Lake Basin, southwest China. Ecol. Indic., 139.10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108932 ↗
77. Du, Y., Li, T., and He, B. (2021). Runoff-related nutrient loss affected by fertilization and cultivation in sloping croplands: An 11-year observation under natural rainfall. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 319.10.1016/j.agee.2021.107549 ↗
78. Dybowski, D., Dzierzbicka-Glowacka, L.A., Pietrzak, S., Juszkowska, D., and Puszkarczuk, T. (2020). Estimation of nitrogen leaching load from agricultural fields in the Puck Commune with an interactive calculator. PeerJ Life Environ., 8.10.7717/peerj.8899 ↗
79. Effect of balanced fertilizers on soil quality and lentil yield in Gangetic alluvial soils of India10.1017/S0021859618000254 ↗
80. Yli-Halla, M., Lötjönen, T., Kekkonen, J., Virtanen, S., Marttila, H., Liimatainen, M., Saari, M., Mikkola, J., Suomela, R., and Joki-Tokola, E. (2022). Thickness of peat influences the leaching of substances and greenhouse gas emissions from a cultivated organic soil. Sci. Total. Environ., 806.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150499 ↗
81. Leaching of nutrients and emission of greenhouse gases from peatland cultivation at Bodin, Northern Norway10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.08.022 ↗
82. The pollution risk assessment of nitrogen and phosphorus loss in surface runoff from farmland fertilizer
83. Pham, T., Yli-Halla, M., Marttila, H., Lötjönen, T., Liimatainen, M., Kekkonen, J., Läpikivi, M., Klöve, B., and Joki-Tokola, E. (2023). Leaching of nitrogen, phosphorus and other solutes from a controlled drainage cultivated peatland in Ruukki, Finland. Sci. Total. Environ., 904.10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166769 ↗
84. Sieczko, A.K., van de Vlasakker, P.C., Tonderski, K., and Metson, G.S. (2022). Seasonal nitrogen and phosphorus leaching in urban agriculture: Dominance of non-growing season losses in a Southern Swedish case study. Urban For. Urban Green., 79.10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127823 ↗
85. Portela, S.I., Reixachs, C., Torti, M.J., Beribe, M.J., and Giannini, A.P. (2024). Contrasting effects of soil type and use of cover crops on nitrogen and phosphorus leaching in agricultural systems of the Argentinean Pampas. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 364.10.1016/j.agee.2024.108897 ↗
86. Nutrient losses over time via surface runoff and subsurface drainage from an agricultural field in northern Sweden10.1002/jeq2.20413 ↗
87. Importance of subsurface fluxes of water, nitrogen and phosphorus from rice paddy fields relative to surface runoff10.1016/j.agwat.2018.11.005 ↗
88. ESRI (2024, July 08). Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) (Spatial Statistics)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation. Available online: https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-statistics/hot-spot-analysis.htm.
89. BPDB (2024, November 12). Bangladesh Power Development Board, Available online: http://www.bpdb.gov.bd/site/page/d2d5afd4-9f20-4c05-9102-a7c7de13798e/-.
90. Mahbub, A.A., and Islam, A.R.M.T. (2023). Current status of running renewable energy in Bangladesh and future prospect: A global comparison. Heliyon, 9.10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14308 ↗
91. Life cycle assessment of portable two-stage anaerobic digestion of mixed food waste and cardboard10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.08.008 ↗
92. Kadiyala, A., Kommalapati, R., and Huque, Z. (2016). Evaluation of the Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Different Biomass Feedstock Electricity Generation Systems. Sustainability, 8.10.3390/su8111181 ↗
93. Siddiqui, S., Zerhusen, B., Zehetmeier, M., and Effenberger, M. (2020). Distribution of specific greenhouse gas emissions from combined heat-and-power production in agricultural biogas plants. Biomass Bioenergy, 133.10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105443 ↗
94. Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion10.1016/j.energy.2014.03.103 ↗
95. Ugwu, S.N., Harding, K., and Enweremadu, C.C. (2022). Comparative life cycle assessment of enhanced anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial waste for biogas production. J. Clean. Prod., 345.10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131178 ↗
96. IEA (2013). CO2 Emissions From Fuel Combustion Highlights, International Energy Agency. Available online: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/co2-emissions-from-fuel-combustion-2013_co2_fuel-2013-en.html.
97. Ecological and economic benefits of the application of bio-based mineral fertilizers in modern agriculture10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.12.036 ↗
98. Rynk, R., van de Kamp, M., Willson, G.B., Singley, M.E., Richard, T.L., Kolega, J.J., Gouin, F.R., Laliberty, L., Kay, D., and Murphy, D.M. (1992). On-Farm Composting Handbook (NRAES 54), Northeast Regional Agricultural Engineering Service.