Liquid fragility determination of oxide glass‐formers using temperature‐modulated DSC
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Glass‐forming liquids exhibit a pronounced diversity in the viscosity‐temperature relation. This has been characterized by the liquid fragility index to quantify the extent of the non‐Arrhenian flow. Precise and accurate determination of liquid fragility is important for understanding a range of phenomena and controlling industrial glass melting processes. In this study, we use temperature‐modulated differential scanning calorimetry (TM‐DSC) to determine liquid fragility of a wide range of oxide compositions, including tellurites, borates, and silicates. We compare our fragility data to those determined using viscometry and the Moynihan DSC approach. We find that TM‐DSC is a useful method for determination of fragility, as it exhibits higher sensitivity and provides an easier and more reliable determination of characteristic temperatures compared to the Moynihan approach. Moreover, TM‐DSC is faster and requires smaller sample volume compared to the viscometric approach. However, we also observe that TM‐DSC tends to either overestimate or underestimate the fragility of very strong and highly fragile compositions, respectively.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Material Dynamics and Properties · Glass properties and applications · High-pressure geophysics and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Chemistry and Bioscience Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark
Science and Technology Division Corning Incorporated Corning New York
Department of Materials Science and Engineering The Pennsylvania State University University Park Pennsylvania
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Los Angeles California
Funding
Det Obelske Familiefond
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. Varshneya AK · 2011
2. 10.1063/1.307716810.1063/1.3077168 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.09420410.1103/PhysRevB.80.094204 ↗
4. Angell CA · 1985 · 3
5. 10.1063/1.46611710.1063/1.466117 ↗
6. 10.1126/science.267.5206.192410.1126/science.267.5206.1924 ↗
7. 10.1038/1904210.1038/19042 ↗
8. 10.1073/pnas.091170510610.1073/pnas.0911705106 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.11.01410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.11.014 ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09376.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1976.tb09376.x ↗
11. Structural relaxation and the glass transition
12. 10.1016/0040-6031(95)02781-510.1016/0040-6031(95)02781-5 ↗
13. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1946.tb11592.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1946.tb11592.x ↗
14. 10.1021/ac60131a04510.1021/ac60131a045 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.168995110.1063/1.1689951 ↗
16. 10.1063/1.151760710.1063/1.1517607 ↗
17. 10.1126/science.106175710.1126/science.1061757 ↗
18. 10.1007/1-4020-3750-310.1007/1-4020-3750-3 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.14410710.1103/PhysRevB.85.144107 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ssi.2008.09.01110.1016/j.ssi.2008.09.011 ↗
21. 10.1007/s10973-009-0522-510.1007/s10973-009-0522-5 ↗
22. 10.1063/1.481148810.1063/1.4811488 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.04.00910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.04.009 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.fluid.2007.03.01110.1016/j.fluid.2007.03.011 ↗
25. 10.1038/3507051710.1038/35070517 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.267410.1103/PhysRevLett.54.2674 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.163110.1103/PhysRevB.34.1631 ↗
28. 10.1007/s10973-006-7652-910.1007/s10973-006-7652-9 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.03310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.033 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2006.09.01310.1016/j.jpcs.2006.09.013 ↗
31. Critical V2O5/TeO2 ratio inducing abrupt property changes in vanadium tellurite glasses
32. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.01.02210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.01.022 ↗
33. 10.1016/S0040-6031(01)00542-110.1016/S0040-6031(01)00542-1 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.11.02710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.11.027 ↗
35. 10.1016/0022-3093(91)90266-910.1016/0022-3093(91)90266-9 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.128603510.1063/1.1286035 ↗
37. 10.1063/1.47804110.1063/1.478041 ↗