journal article·2025-06-04Open access

Assessing Building Seismic Exposure Using Geospatial Technologies in Data-Scarce Environments: Case Study of San José, Costa Rica

Javier Rodríguez-Saiz, Beatriz González-Rodrigo, Juan Gregorio Rejas-Ayuga, Diego A. Hidalgo-Leiva, Miguel Marchamalo-Sacristán

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 11

Abstract

The world population affected by seismic risk is increasing due to urban sprawl, especially in vulnerable areas of countries with high population growth. Despite this trend, seismic exposure assessments have predominantly focused on cities in high-income countries, leaving a knowledge gap in data-scarce, seismically active urban areas. This research presents a novel, scalable geospatial methodology for seismic exposure assessment in contexts with limited data availability and its application to San José, Costa Rica, evaluating its time and cost efficiency. The methodology prioritizes the use of free and open-access geospatial data to construct city-scale Geospatial Exposure Databases (city-GEDs) at the individual building level. These databases integrate key attributes from the Global Earthquake Model (GEM) taxonomy, including the building footprint, the plan regularity, the construction date, the roof material, the relative position within the urban block, and urban block compactness. Random Forest classification models were developed to assign buildings to expert-defined building typologies (BTs). In the case of San José, 7226 buildings were classified into eight typologies using the derived attributes, achieving a classification error of 46%. When the building height—visually sampled—was included, the error decreased significantly to 13%, confirming its importance in typology prediction and emphasizing the need for efficient acquisition strategies. This approach is essential for quick pre- or post-disaster seismic risk assessment, allowing time and cost-effective data collection and analysis. This contribution is particularly relevant for Central America and other seismically active regions with limited data, supporting improved risk analysis and urban resilience planning.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: BIM and Construction Integration · Insurance and Financial Risk Management · Geographic Information Systems Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Buin Ingenieros SL, 28036 Madrid, Spain

Departamento de Ingeniería y Morfología del Terreno, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos (ETSICCP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Departamento de Ingeniería y Gestión Forestal, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Montes, Forestal y del Medio Natural (ETSIMFMN), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Instituto Nacional de Técnica Aeroespacial (INTA), 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Spain

Laboratorio de Ingeniería Sísmica, Universidad de Costa Rica, San José 11501-2060, Costa Rica

Centro de I+D+i en Infraestructuras Inteligentes y Sostenibles (CIVILis), Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos (ETSICCP), Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Funding

Comunidad de Madrid Industrial Doctorate Program · MCIN

References (77)

Show source-provided references
1. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (2025, January 16). NCEI/WDS Global Significant Earthquake Database. National Geophysical Data Center, Available online: https://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/hazel/view/hazards/earthquake/search.
2. Guha-Sapir, D. (2025, January 16). EM-DAT: The Emergency Events Database. Université Catholique de Louvain. Available online: https://www.emdat.be/.
3. Spatial aspects of building and population exposure data and their implications for global earthquake exposure modeling10.1007/s11069-012-0241-2 ↗
4. Porter, K., Hu, Z., Huyck, C., and Bevington, J. (2014). User Guide: Field Sampling Strategies for Estimating Building Inventories, GEM Foundation. Technical Report 2014-02.
5. A building classification system for multi-hazard risk assessment10.1007/s13753-022-00400-x ↗
6. Leggieri, V., Mastrodonato, G., and Uva, G. (2022). GIS Multisource data for the seismic vulnerability assessment of buildings at the urban scale. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12050523 ↗
7. Zsarnóczay, A., Deierlein, G., and McKenna, F. (July, January 30). Accelerate innovation in regional simulations through shared computational workflows & data. Proceedings of the World Conference of Earthquake Engineering, Milan, Italy.
8. Evangelista, M.K., Aquino, D.H., and Ramos, J.A. (2021–16, January 15). Utilizing Google Street View for Rapid Seismic Vulnerability Assessment: Case Study in the City of Manila, Philippines. Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Online.10.1088/1755-1315/1091/1/012037 ↗
9. Gis-based rapid earthquake exposure and vulnerability mapping using lidar dem and machine learning algorithms: Case of porac, pampanga
10. Zhou, J., Liu, Y., Nie, G., Cheng, H., Yang, X., Chen, X., and Gross, L. (2022). Building Extraction and Floor Area Estimation at the Village Level in Rural China Via a Comprehensive Method Integrating UAV Photogrammetry and the Novel EDSANet. Remote Sens, 14.10.3390/rs14205175 ↗
11. Using remote sensing for exposure and seismic vulnerability evaluation: Is it reliable?10.1080/15481603.2023.2196162 ↗
12. Benefits of global earth observation missions for disaggregation of exposure data and earthquake loss modeling: Evidence from Santiago de Chile10.1007/s11069-022-05672-6 ↗
13. Rejas Ayuga, J.G., Marín, R.M., and Velasco, J.A.M. (2007). Hyperspectral remote sensing application for semi-urban areas monitoring. Urban Remote Sensing Joint Event, IEEE.10.1109/URS.2007.371806 ↗
14. Hyperspectral anomaly detection in urban scenarios
15. Measuring urban compactness based on functional characterization and human activity intensity by integrating multiple geospatial data sources10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107177 ↗
16. Pavić, G., Hadzima-Nyarko, M., Bulajić, B., and Jurković, Ž. (2020). Development of seismic vulnerability and exposure models-A case study of Croatia. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12030973 ↗
17. A transferable remote sensing approach to classify building structural types for seismic risk analyses: The case of Val d’Agri area (Italy)10.1007/s10518-019-00648-7 ↗
18. Fault zone regulation, seismic hazard, and social vulnerability in Los Angeles, California: Hazard or urban amenity?10.1002/2014EF000241 ↗
19. Vulnerability of populations exposed to seismic risk in the state of Oklahoma10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102295 ↗
20. An end-to-end framework for fire following earthquake simulation at regional scale: A case study on the 2024 Japan Noto Peninsula earthquake10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104859 ↗
21. Rapid seismic-damage assessment method for buildings on a regional scale based on spectrum-compatible data augmentation and deep learning10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.108504 ↗
22. Estimation of pixel-level seismic vulnerability of the building environment based on mid-resolution optical remote sensing images
23. Toward a uniform earthquake loss model across Central America10.1177/87552930211043894 ↗
24. New seismic exposure modeling approach for Guatemala City10.1007/s10518-022-01570-1 ↗
25. An interdisciplinary study of the seismic exposure dynamics of Santiago de Chile10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101581 ↗
26. Zapata, J.C.G., Zafrir, R., Pittore, M., and Merino, Y. (2022). Towards a Sensitivity Analysis in Seismic Risk with Probabilistic Building Exposure Models: An Application in Valparaíso, Chile Using Ancillary Open-Source Data and Parametric Ground Motions. ISPRS Int. J. Geoinf., 11.10.3390/ijgi11020113 ↗
27. Benito, M.B., Arroyo-Solorzano, M., Climent, A., Montero, W., E Alvarado, G., López, A., García-Lanchares, C., Marchamalo, M., Ornelas, A., and Hernández-Rubio, O. (2025). Seismic hazard scenarios for the city of San José, Costa Rica: Evaluation of critical ruptures on nearby faults. Earthq. Spectra.10.1177/87552930251319736 ↗
28. Colegio Federado de Ingenieros y Arquitectos de Costa Rica (1974). Código Sísmico de Costa Rica 1974, Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.
29. Colegio Federado de Ingenieros y Arquitectos de Costa Rica (1986). Código Sísmico de Costa Rica 1986, Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.
30. Colegio Federado de Ingenieros y Arquitectos de Costa Rica (2002). Código Sísmico de Costa Rica 2002, Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.
31. Colegio Federado de Ingenieros y Arquitectos de Costa Rica (2010). Código Sísmico de Costa Rica 2010, Editorial Tecnológica de Costa Rica.
32. FEMA (2024, November 14). Hazus, Available online: https://www.fema.gov/es/flood-maps/products-tools/hazus.
33. (2024, November 14). Global Earthquake Model Foundation. Available online: https://www.globalquakemodel.org/.
34. A methodology to assess and select seismic fragility curves: Application to the case of Costa Rica10.1177/87552930231171177 ↗
35. Sauter, F., and Shah, H. (1978). Study of Insurance for Earthquakes, National Insurance Institute.
36. Montoya, L. (2002). Urban Disaster Management: A Case Study of Earthquake Risk Assessment in Cartago, Costa Rica. [Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University]. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241884744.
37. Climent, A., Salgado, D., Slob, S., and van Westen, C.J. (2003). Amenaza Sísmica y Vulnerabilidad Física en la Ciudad de Cañas, Guanacaste, Costa Rica, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation.
38. Alvarado, L.A.S. (2003). Evaluación del Riesgo Sísmico en Edificaciones Residenciales del Área Metropolitana de San José en Función de Pérdidas de Vidas Humanas. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Costa Rica].
39. GeoHazards International (2001). United Nations Centre for Regional Development. Global Earthquake Safety Initiative (GESI), GeoHazards International. Pilot Project.
40. Arboleda, O.D.C. (2001). Estimación Holística del Riesgo Sísmico Utilizando Sistemas Dinámicos Complejos. [Ph.D. Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya].
41. Cardona, A.O.D., Yamín, L.L.E., Bernal, G.G.A., Ordaz, S.M.G., Reinoso, A.E., Horia, B.A.B., and Carreño, T.M.L. (2025, May 25). Informe Técnico ERN-CAPRA T2-5. Caracterización Local de la Vulnerabilidad de Edificaciones. Available online: www.ecapra.org.
42. Miyamoto International Inc (2024, November 28). Programa USAID/OFDA PREPARE. Preparación del Personal de Rescate y Emergencia Para Mejorar la Respuesta a Los Terremotos. Informe Final. Fase I: Evaluación de Los Riesgos del Terremoto. San José, Costa Rica. Available online: www.miyamotointernational.com.
43. Probabilistic seismic vulnerability and loss assessment of the residential building stock in Costa Rica10.1007/s10518-018-0499-1 ↗
44. Esquivel-Salas, L.C., Schmidt-Díaz, V., Pittore, M., Hidalgo-Leiva, D., Haas, M., and Moya-Fernández, A. (2022). Remote structural characterization of thousands of buildings from San Jose, Costa Rica. Front. Built. Environ., 8.10.3389/fbuil.2022.947329 ↗
45. Estimación del período de construcción de las edificaciones del cantón de San José por medio de análisis de fotografías aéreas10.15359/rgac.67-2.3 ↗
46. Esquivel-Salas, L.C., Schmidt-Díaz, V., Pittore, M., Hidalgo-Leiva, D.A., Haas, M., and Moya-Fernández, A. (2021). Dataset of the Attributes Affecting Seismic Performance of a Sample of Buildings from San José-Costa Rica, German Research Centre for Geosciences.
47. Esquivel-Salas, L., Pittore, M., Schmidt-Díaz, V., and Haas, M. (2021). Photographsof Buildings from San Jose canton, CostaRica, Taken from the Street, 4TU.ResearchData Collection.
48. Brzev, S., Scawthorn, C., Charleson, A.W., Allen, L., Greene, M., Jaiswal, K., and Silva, V. (2013). GEM Building Taxonomy Version 2.0, GEM Foundation.
49. Parolai, S. (2016). DB2 Software Platform and Processing Tools, SIBYL (Seismic monitoring and vulnerability framework for civil protection), German Research Centre for Geosciences. Available online: https://www.sibyl-project.eu/.
50. Ruiz Cubillo, P., and Soto, G. (2014). Preparación del Mapa de Susceptibilidad a Deslizamientos Utilizando Imágenes Lídar en los Cerros de Escazú, cantones Aserrí, Desamparados, Alajuelita, Santa Ana y Escazú, Comisión Nacional de Prevención de Riesgos y Atención de Emergencias.
51. Salas, L.C.E. (2020). Inventario de Edificaciones del Cantón de San José Para el Caso Específico de Amenaza Sísmica Utilizando el Método de Mapeo Ambiental Rápido. [Ph.D. Thesis, Univerisdad de Costa Rica].
52. (2024, November 14). OpenStreetMap. Available online: https://www.openstreetmap.org/.
53. Corbane, C., Florczyk, A., Pesaresi, M., Politis, P., and Syrris, V. (2018). GHS-BUILTR2018A-GHS Built-Up Grid, Derived from Landsat, Multitemporal (1975–1990–2000–2014), European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC).
54. Understanding current trends in global urbanisation-The world settlement footprint suite10.1553/giscience2021_01_s33 ↗
55. (2024, December 16). Sentinel-2|Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem. Available online: https://dataspace.copernicus.eu/explore-data/data-collections/sentinel-data/sentinel-2.
56. NASA (2024, December 16). Earthdata, Available online: https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search.
57. Sistema Nacional de Información Territorial (2025, April 28). Costa Rica Orthoimage 2015–2018 1k. Available online: https://www.snitcr.go.cr/ico_servicios_ogc_info?k=bm9kbzo6NjA=&nombre=Ortofoto%202015-2018%201k.
58. Microsoft Bing (2024, December 16). Global ML Building Footprints. Available online: https://github.com/microsoft/GlobalMLBuildingFootprints?tab=readme-ov-file.
59. Zhao, Q., and Wentz, E.A. (2016). A MODIS/ASTER Airborne Simulator (MASTER) Imagery for Urban Heat Island Research. Data, 1.10.3390/data1010007 ↗
60. González-Rodrigo, B., Hidalgo-Leiva, D., Flores, O., Germoso, C., Jiménez-Martínez, M., Navas-Sánchez, L., Orta, B., Tarque-Ruiz, N., Hernández-Rubio, O., and Marchamalo-Sacristán, M. (2025, April 10). Sustainable and resilient construction in Central America and the Caribbean in the face of seismic hazard: Regional cooperation based on the experience of Costa Rica (9063-03). Triangular Cooperation between the EU, Latin America, and the Caribbean (LAC), European Union’s flagship program Adelante 2. Available online: https://sismica.lis.ucr.ac.cr/.
61. (2025, April 10). OverPass API. Available online: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Overpass_API.
62. Sistema Nacional de Información Territorial (2025, April 10). Costa Rica. Mosaico Ortofotos Escala 1:100. 2015–2018. Available online: https://geos1.snitcr.go.cr/Ortofoto1k/wmts?VERSION=1.0.0.
63. The Third Criterion: Compactness as a Procedural Safeguard Against Partisan Gerrymandering
64. Automated global delineation of human settlements from 40 years of Landsat satellite data archives10.1080/20964471.2019.1625528 ↗
65. Seismic behaviour of reinforced-masonry aggregate under different types of interaction between adjacent dwellings10.1007/s10518-023-01782-z ↗
66. The MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator (MASTER)—A new instrument for earth science studies10.1016/S0034-4257(00)00195-4 ↗
67. Monitoring salinity in bare soil based on Sentinel-1/2 image fusion and machine learning10.1016/j.infrared.2023.104656 ↗
68. Ahmed, M., Seraj, R., and Islam, S.M.S. (2020). The k-means algorithm: A comprehensive survey and performance evaluation. Electronics, 9.10.3390/electronics9081295 ↗
69. Risk-oriented, bottom-up modeling of building portfolios with faceted taxonomies10.3389/fbuil.2018.00041 ↗
70. A methodology to assess and select seismic fragility curves: Calibration from expert survey and fuzzy analysis10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104930 ↗
71. Random forest in remote sensing: A review of applications and future directions10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.01.011 ↗
72. Machine learning network suitable for accurate rapid seismic risk estimation of masonry building stocks10.1007/s11069-022-05553-y ↗
73. Flood loss estimation using 3D city models and remote sensing data10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.032 ↗
74. Ureña-Pliego, M., Martínez-Marín, R., González-Rodrigo, B., and Marchamalo-Sacristán, M. (2023). Automatic Building Height Estimation: Machine Learning Models for Urban Image Analysis. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13085037 ↗
75. Google (2025, April 28). Google Street View. Available online: https://www.google.com/intl/en_uk/streetview/.
76. Meta (2025, April 28). Mapillary. Available online: https://www.mapillary.com.
77. Global Building Exposure Model for Earthquake Risk Assessment10.1177/87552930231194048 ↗