journal article·2025-05-09Open access

Benefits of Probiotics—Biodetoxification

Barbara Sionek, Aleksandra Szydłowska, Danuta Jaworska, Danuta Kołożyn-Krajewska

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 10

Abstract

The rapid growth of the world’s population is generating escalating demands for food production. Global food demand is expected to increase by 35% to 56% between 2010 and 2050. Therefore, food mass production is becoming more challenging. The chemicalization of food production, processing, transport, packaging, and storage is almost impossible to avoid. These factors, along with environmental pollution, contribute to the increase in food product contamination. Xenobiotics appearing in food, including a variety of toxic substances (heavy metals, acrylamide, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons), and pathogens (pathogenic bacteria, fungi, molds, and yeast-producing mycotoxins) can threaten consumers’ safety and have negative economic implications. In this regard, the introduction of effective detoxification methods appears to be very important. It can be accomplished by physical, chemical, and biological means. Many reports have proved that probiotics are useful in food biodetoxification. Probiotics effectively reduce food contamination (at various stages of food production) and, moreover, annihilate toxins present in the human body. Many in vitro studies have confirmed the biodetoxification properties of probiotics, demonstrating that they diminish the toxic effects of the main types of food contaminants (heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, pesticides, mycotoxins, nitrates and nitrites, acrylamide, alkylphenols, biogenic amines, and dioxins). Probiotics produce various bioactive compounds, including antimutagenic, antioxidant, and anti-carcinogenic compounds. Their protective and beneficial influence on human microbiota can modulate host inflammatory processes, inhibit carcinogenesis, and modify immune resistance. Detoxification with probiotics is environment-friendly and, unlike physical and chemical methods, does not adversely affect the nutritional value and quality of food. In addition, probiotics in food are associated with well-known human health benefits; therefore, as a functional food, they have gained common consumer acceptance. The large-scale application of biodetoxification methods in both agriculture and the food industry is a challenge for the future. Based on contemporary research, this review provides the mechanism of probiotic biodetoxification, possible applications of various probiotics, and future trends.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Probiotics and Fermented Foods · Polyamine Metabolism and Applications · Gut microbiota and health

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Food Gastronomy and Food Hygiene, Institute of Human Nutrition Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (WULS), Nowoursynowska St. 159C, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

Department of Dietetics and Food Studies, Faculty of Science and Technology, Jan Dlugosz University in Czestochowa, Al. Armii Krajowej 13/15, 42-200 Czestochowa, Poland

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. (2025, April 24). World Population Prospects 2024 Photo Credit. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/file/16497.
2. A meta-analysis of projected global food demand and population at risk of hunger for the period 2010–205010.1038/s43016-021-00322-9 ↗
3. Probiotics: A Promising Generation of Heavy Metal Detoxification
4. The international scientific association for probiotics and prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66 ↗
5. World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guidelines. Probiotics and prebioticsexternal link disclaimer
6. A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 ↗
7. Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains from animal environment with in vitro aflatoxin B1 binding ability and anti-pathogenic bacterial influence10.3920/WMJ2010.1208 ↗
8. Feng, P., Ye, Z., Kakade, A., Virk, A.K., Li, X., and Liu, P.A. (2019). Review on Gut Remediation of Selected Environmental Contaminants: Possible Roles of Probiotics and Gut Microbiota. Nutrients, 11.10.3390/nu11010022 ↗
9. About food additives as important part of functional food
10. Degradation of Food Colours Using Probiotic Bacteria Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus fermentum
11. Environmental Chemical Contaminants in Food: Review of a Global Problem10.1155/2019/2345283 ↗
12. Rather, I.A., Koh, W.Y., Paek, W.K., and Lim, J. (2017). The sources of chemical contaminants in food and their health implications. Front. Pharmacol., 8.10.3389/fphar.2017.00830 ↗
13. Preventing chemical contaminants in food: Challenges and prospects for safe and sustainable food production10.1016/j.foodcont.2023.110040 ↗
14. Emerging food contaminants: A review10.1007/s00216-010-3944-9 ↗
15. FAO/WHO (2025, January 15). Codex Alimentarius Commission. Food and Cosmetics Toxicology. 1966; 4, 601, Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/ar/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FMeetings%252FCX-709-14%252Fal95_17e.p.
16. EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Schrenk, D., Schrenk, D., Bignami, M., Bodin, L., Chipman, J.K., del Mazo, J., Grasl-Kraupp, B., Hoogenboom, L., and Leblanc, J. (2024). Guidance for the assessment of detoxification processes in feed. EFSA J. Eur. Food Saf. Auth., 22, e8528.10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8528 ↗
17. Noland, D., Drisko, J., and Wagner, L. (2020). Detoxification and Biotransformation. Integrative and Functional Medical Nutrition Therapy, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-030-30730-1 ↗
18. Biodegradation of chemical contamination by lactic acid bacteria: A biological tool for food safety10.1016/j.foodchem.2024.140732 ↗
19. Hassan, Y., and Zhou, T. (2018). Promising detoxification strategies to mitigate mycotoxins in food and feed. Toxins, 10.10.3390/toxins10030116 ↗
20. Effect of handling and processing on pesticide residues in food- a review10.1007/s13197-011-0499-5 ↗
21. Food contamination during food process10.1016/j.tifs.2015.12.004 ↗
22. Cell wall structure and function in lactic acid bacteria10.1186/1475-2859-13-S1-S9 ↗
23. The immunomodulatory properties of probiotic microorganisms beyond their viability (ghost probiotics: Proposal of paraprobiotic concept)10.1007/s12263-011-0218-x ↗
24. Screening of Lactobacillus casei strains for their ability to bind aflatoxin B110.1016/j.fct.2009.01.042 ↗
25. Sionek, B., and Gantner, M. (2025). Probiotics and Paraprobiotics—New Proposal for Functional Food. Appl. Sci., 15.10.3390/app15010366 ↗
26. Detoxification of cancerogenic compounds by lactic acid bacteria strains10.1080/10408398.2017.1339665 ↗
27. Ameen, F.A., Hamdan, A.M., and El-Naggar, M.Y. (2020). Assessment of the heavy metal bioremediation efficiency of the novel marine lactic acid bacterium, Lactobacillus plantarum MF042018. Sci. Rep., 10.10.1038/s41598-019-57210-3 ↗
28. Microbial detoxification of mycotoxins in food and feed10.1080/10408398.2021.1879730 ↗
29. Lactic Acid Bacteria as Antifungal and Anti-Mycotoxigenic Agents: A Comprehensive Review10.1111/1541-4337.12481 ↗
30. Mycotoxin patulin in food matrices: Occurrence and its biological degradation strategies10.1080/03602532.2019.1589493 ↗
31. Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 and patulin by Enterococcus faecium strains10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.03.006 ↗
32. Ndiaye, S., Zhang, M., Fall, M., Ayessou, N.M., Zhang, Q., and Li, P. (2022). Current Review of Mycotoxin Biodegradation and Bioadsorption: Microorganisms, Mechanisms, and Main Important Applications. Toxins, 14.10.3390/toxins14110729 ↗
33. Wang, Y., Zhang, H., Yan, H., Yin, C., Liu, Y., Xu, Q., Liu, X., and Zhang, Z. (2018). Effective Biodegradation of Aflatoxin B1 Using the Bacillus licheniformis (BL010) Strain. Toxins, 10.10.3390/toxins10120497 ↗
34. Detoxification of Aflatoxin B1 by antifungal compounds from Lactobacillus brevis and Lactobacillus paracasei, isolated from dairy products10.1007/s12602-017-9350-2 ↗
35. Removal of aflatoxin b1 and t-2 toxin by bacteria isolated from commercially available probiotic dairy foods10.1177/1082013220987916 ↗
36. Mercury biodecontamination from Milk by using L. acidophilus ATCC 435610.22207/JPAM.14.4.10 ↗
37. Screening and identification of Lactobacillus with potential cadmium removal and its application in fruit and vegetable juices10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108053 ↗
38. Assessment of resistance and biosorption ability of Lactobacillus paracasei to remove lead and cadmium from aqueous solution10.1002/wer.1540 ↗
39. Assessment of arsenic sorption properties of lactic acid bacteria isolated from fecal samples for application as bioremediation tool10.1007/s13201-022-01634-2 ↗
40. Armenova, N., Tsigoriyna, L., Arsov, A., Petrov, K., and Petrova, P. (2023). Microbial Detoxification of Residual Pesticides in Fermented Foods: Current Status and Prospects. Foods, 12.10.3390/foods12061163 ↗
41. Probiotic cultures as a potential protective strategy against the toxicity of environmentally relevant chemicals: State-of-the-art knowledge10.1016/j.fct.2022.113582 ↗
42. Residue behavior of organochlorine pesticides during the production process of yogurt and cheese10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.017 ↗
43. The comparison of probiotic monocultures influence on organochlorine pesticides changes in fermented beverages from cow and goat milk during cold storage10.15567/mljekarstvo.2019.0303 ↗
44. IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans (2010). Some non-heterocyclic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and some related exposures. IARC Monogr. Eval. Carcinog. Risks Hum., 92, 1–853.
45. Potential anti-carcinogenic effect of probiotic and lactic acid bacteria in detoxification of benzo[a]pyrene: A review10.1016/j.tifs.2020.02.029 ↗
46. Screening of Bifidobacterium strains to bind with Benzo[a]pyrene under food stress factors and the mechanism of the process10.1111/jfpp.13956 ↗
47. Screening of Lactobacillus strains for their ability to bind benzo(a)pyrene and the mechanism of the process10.1016/j.fct.2013.05.040 ↗
48. Using probiotics for mitigation of acrylamide in food products: A mini review10.1016/j.cofs.2020.01.011 ↗
49. Acrylamide is formed in the Maillard reaction10.1038/419448a ↗
50. Acrylamide and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF): A review on metabolism, toxicity, occurrence in food and mitigation strategies10.1016/j.lwt.2010.11.002 ↗
51. Acrylamide formation and different mitigation strategies during food processing–A review10.1080/87559129.2020.1719505 ↗
52. Key role of peptidoglycan on acrylamide binding by lactic acid bacteria10.1007/s10068-017-0036-z ↗
53. Effective treatment for suppression of acrylamide formation in fried potato chips using L asparaginase from Bacillus subtilis10.1007/s13205-015-0278-5 ↗
54. Mitigation of acrylamide by l-asparaginase from Bacillus subtilis KDPS1 and analysis of degradation products by HPLC and HPTLC10.1186/s40064-016-2159-8 ↗
55. EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources added to Food (ANS), Mortensen, A., Aguilar, F., Crebelli, R., Di Domenico, A., Dusemund, B., Frutos, M.J., Galtier, P., Gott, D., and Gundert-Remy, U. (2017). Re-evaluation of potassium nitrite (E 249) and sodium nitrite (E 250) as food additives. EFSA J., 15, e04786.10.2903/j.efsa.2017.4786 ↗
56. Nitrate and nitrite content of vegetables, fruits, grains, legumes, dairy products, meats and processed meats10.1016/j.jfca.2016.06.006 ↗
57. Plant derived ingredients rich in nitrates or phenolics for protection of pork against protein oxidation10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108789 ↗
58. Nitrate and Nitrites in Foods: Worldwide Regional Distribution in View of Their Risks and Benefits10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01194 ↗
59. Willmott, T., Serrage, H.J., Cottrell, E.C., Humphreys, G.J., Myers, J., Campbell, P.M., and McBain, A.J. (2024). Investigating the association between nitrate dosing and nitrite generation by the human oral microbiota in continuous culture. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 90.10.1128/aem.02035-23 ↗
60. Dietary nitrate attenuates renal ischemia-reperfusion injuries by modulation of immune responses and reduction of oxidative stress10.1016/j.redox.2017.06.002 ↗
61. Effect of different lactic acid bacteria on nitrite degradation, volatile profiles, and sensory quality in Chinese traditional paocai10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111597 ↗
62. Sionek, B., Okoń, A., Łepecka, A., Antoniewska-Krzeska, A., Szymański, P., Jaworska, D., Rutkowska, J., and Kołożyn-Krajewska, D. (2025). Effect of Natural Marination Based on Apple Vinegar and Acid Whey on Volatile and Sensory Profile, Safety, and Physicochemical Properties of Raw Fermented Beef Hams. Agriculture, 15.10.3390/agriculture15010107 ↗
63. (2025, April 23). COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) 2023/2108 of 6 October 2023 Amending Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 1333/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Counciland the Annex to Commission Regulation (EU) No 231/2012 as Regards Food Additives Nitrites (E249-250) and nitrates (E 251-252). Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=OJ:L_202302108.
64. EFSA (2011). Scientific Opinion on risk based control of biogenic amine formation in fermented foods. EFSA J., 9, 2393–2486.10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2393 ↗
65. A review of the currently developed analytical methods for the determination of biogenic amines in food products10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133919 ↗
66. The importance of lactic acid bacteria for the prevention of bacterial growth and their biogenic amines formation: A review10.1080/10408398.2016.1277972 ↗
67. Sionek, B., Szydłowska, A., and Kołożyn-Krajewska, D. (2024). The Role of Microorganisms and Their Antibacterial Compounds in Food Biopreservation. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14135557 ↗
68. Gupta, R.K., Pipliya, S., Karunanithi, S., Eswaran, U.G.M., Kumar, S., Mandliya, S., Srivastav, P.P., Suthar, T., Shaikh, A.M., and Harsányi, E. (2024). Migration of Chemical Compounds from Packaging Materials into Packaged Foods: Interaction, Mechanism, Assessment, and Regulations. Foods, 13.10.3390/foods13193125 ↗
69. Food grade plastics and bisphenol a: Associated risks, toxicity, and bioremediation approaches10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133474 ↗
70. (2025, April 19). Commission Regulation (EU) 2024/3190 of 19 December 2024. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/3190/oj/eng.
71. Degradation potential of bisphenol A by Lactobacillus reuteri10.1016/j.lwt.2019.02.022 ↗
72. Host-microbial interactions in the metabolism of therapeutic and diet-derived xenobiotics10.1172/JCI72335 ↗
73. Chemical transformation of xenobiotics by the human gut microbiota10.1126/science.aag2770 ↗
74. Probiotics as potential detoxification tools for mitigation of pesticides: A mini review10.1111/ijfs.14880 ↗
75. Oral administration of probiotics inhibits absorption of the heavy metal Cadmium by protecting the intestinal barrier10.1128/AEM.00695-16 ↗
76. Screening, determination and confirmation of tetracycline residues in chicken tissues using four-plate test, ELISA and HPLC-UV methods: Comparison between correlation results10.1080/09540105.2015.1036357 ↗
77. Voltammetric determination of Pb, Cd, Zn, Cu and Se in milk and dairy products collected from Iran: An emphasis on permissible limits and risk assessment of exposure to heavy metals10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.07.123 ↗
78. Immobilization of cadmium and lead by Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 mitigates apical-to-basolateral heavy metal translocation in a Caco-2 model of the intestinal epithelium10.1080/19490976.2018.1526581 ↗
79. Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain GG reduces aflatoxin B1 transport, metabolism, and toxicity in Caco-2 Cells10.1128/AEM.02944-06 ↗
80. Lactiplantibacillus plantarum P9 improved gut microbial metabolites and alleviated inflammatory response in pesticide exposure cohorts10.1016/j.isci.2022.104472 ↗
81. Regulation of Lactobacillus plantarum on the reactive oxygen species related metabolisms of Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111492 ↗
82. Bisphenol A removal and degradation pathways in microorganisms with probiotic properties
83. Effect of probiotics, Bifidobacterium breve and Lactobacillus casei, on bisphenol A exposure in rats10.1271/bbb.70672 ↗
84. Bioremediation of heavy metal ion (Cu2+) by live probiotic Janus microparticles using droplet-based microfluidic technique10.1016/j.cej.2024.157855 ↗
85. Structure and Inhibition of Microbiome β-Glucuronidases Essential to the Alleviation of Cancer Drug Toxicity10.1016/j.chembiol.2015.08.005 ↗
86. Targeted inhibition of gut bacterial β-glucuronidase activity enhances anticancer drug efficacy10.1073/pnas.1918095117 ↗
87. Adsorption of ochratoxin A and zearalenone by potential probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains and its relation with cell wall thickness10.1111/j.1365-2672.2012.05331.x ↗
88. Protective effects of Lactobacillus plantarum CCFM8610 against acute cadmium toxicity in mice10.1128/AEM.03417-12 ↗
89. Use of Lactobacillus paracasei strain for zearalenone binding and metabolization10.1016/j.toxicon.2020.03.011 ↗
90. Biosorption of low concentration levels of Lead (II) and cadmium (II) from aqueous solution by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Response surface methodology10.1016/j.bcab.2018.05.001 ↗
91. Risk of low stability Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATCC 9763-heavy metals complex in gastrointestinal simulated conditions10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09452 ↗
92. Metal removal from chromium containing synthetic effluents by Saccharomyces cerevisiae10.5004/dwt.2020.24987 ↗
93. Gut reactions: Breaking down xenobiotic-microbiome interactions10.1124/pr.118.015768 ↗
94. Liver regeneration and alcoholic liver disease10.21037/atm.2020.02.168 ↗
95. Microbial diversity: Application of microorganisms for the biodegradation of xenobiotics
96. Fermentation of table cream by Lactobacillus plantarum strains: Effect on fungal growth, aflatoxin M1 and ochratoxin A10.1111/ijfs.13943 ↗
97. Azad, A.K., Sarker, M., and Wan, D. (2018). Immunomodulatory Effects of Probiotics on Cytokine Profiles. BioMed Res. Int., 2018.10.1155/2018/8063647 ↗
98. Mazziotta, C., Tognon, M., Martini, F., Torreggiani, E., and Rotondo, J.C. (2023). Probiotics Mechanism of Action on Immune Cells and Beneficial Effects on Human Health. Cells, 12.10.3390/cells12010184 ↗
99. Schwab, M. Xenobiotics. Encyclopedia of Cancer, Springer.
100. Pratiksha, Probiotics and their significance in therapeutic nutrition10.18231/j.ijnmhs.2020.004 ↗