Impact of the Spatiotemporal Relationship Between Blast Source and Protected Area on Wave Arrival Sequence and Vibration Control Methods in Bench Blasting
Source abstract
Abstract
The adjustment of delay time in open-pit bench blasting is a research hotspot in vibration control. Its core lies in utilizing the periodic characteristics of vibration waves to achieve the superposition and cancellation of wave peaks and troughs. However, due to the spatiotemporal variability in the propagation of blast-induced vibration waves, the optimal delay time determined for vibration control requirements at a specific protected area (monitoring point) makes it difficult to achieve the misalignment superposition effect simultaneously at multiple monitoring points. To address the challenge of multi-area vibration control in open-pit bench blasting, this paper proposes an adjustment method based on local delay adjustment. First, a spatiotemporal relationship model between blast holes with monitoring points is established to calculate vibration wave arrival times. This enables rapid hole identification during dense wave arrivals at monitoring points, with waveform separation achieved through initiation delay adjustments. Following the Anderson principle, reconstructed single-hole vibrations are superimposed according to the wave arrival sequence to validate control efficacy. Statistical analysis of concurrent wave arrivals across all-direction monitoring points identifies high-probability vibration hazard locations. Targeted delay adjustments for blast holes within clustering arrival periods at these locations enable comprehensive vibration reduction. Field data confirm that single-point control reduces peak vibration by >10.55% through simultaneously reducing the amount of waves in clustering arrival periods. Multi-point control resolves seven hazard locations across two directions, attaining 88.57% hazard elimination efficiency and 14.05% peak velocity attenuation. This method achieves vibration control through local delay adjustments while maintaining the fragmentation effect of the original scheme, providing a new approach to solving the challenge of vibration control in large-scale blasting areas.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering · Structural Response to Dynamic Loads · Industrial Engineering and Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Resources and Safety Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, China
Funding
Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by BAST
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. Evaluation and optimization of blasting approaches to reducing oversize boulders and toes in open-pit mine10.1016/j.ijmst.2020.03.010 ↗
2. A system-wide approach to minimize the operational cost of bench production in open-cast mining operations10.1007/s40789-018-0234-1 ↗
3. An operational-level multi-stage mine production timetabling model for optimally synchronising drilling, blasting and excavating operations10.1080/17480930.2016.1160818 ↗
4. Dumakor-Dupey, N., Arya, S., and Jha, A. (2021). Advances in blast-induced impact prediction—A review of machine learning applications. Minerals, 11.10.3390/min11060601 ↗
5. Analysis of predictor equations for determining the blast-induced vibration in rock blasting10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.02.009 ↗
6. Prediction of ground vibration intensity in mine blasting using the novel hybrid MARS–PSO–MLP model10.1007/s00366-021-01332-8 ↗
7. Reliability of empirical relation on the attenuation of blast-induced vibrations
8. Assessing and controlling of bench blasting-induced vibrations to minimize impacts to a neighboring community10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.210 ↗
9. Study on the propagation law of tunnel blasting vibration in stratum and blasting vibration reduction technology10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105813 ↗
10. Discussion on blasting vibration monitoring for rock damage control in rock slope excavation10.1007/s11803-021-2071-2 ↗
11. Guo, J., Zhao, P., and Li, P. (2023). Prediction and optimization of blasting-induced ground vibration in open-pit mines using intelligent algorithms. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127166 ↗
12. Coupling of two methods, waveform superposition and numerical to model blast vibration effect on slope stability in jointed rock masses10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.04.008 ↗
13. Mansouri, H., and EBRAHIMI, F. (2015). Blast vibration modeling using linear superposition method. J. Min. Environ., 125–140.
14. Frequency channeling: A concept to increase the frequency and control the PPV of blast-induced ground vibration waves in multi-hole blast in a surface mine10.1007/s10064-021-02400-5 ↗
15. Prediction of back break in blasting using random decision trees10.1007/s00366-020-01280-9 ↗
16. An innovative technique of simplified signature hole analysis for prediction of blast-induced ground vibration of multi-hole production blast: An empirical analysis10.1007/s11069-019-03801-2 ↗
17. Reducing environmental hazards of blasting using electronic detonators in a large opencast coal project-a case study
18. Reliability analysis for mine blast performance based on delay type and firing time10.1016/j.ijmst.2017.07.004 ↗
19. Attenuation of rock blasting induced ground vibration in rock-soil interface10.1016/j.jrmge.2018.12.009 ↗
20. Influence of initiation system on blast-induced ground vibration using random forest algorithm, artificial neural network, and scaled distance analysis10.18280/mmep.050419 ↗
21. Study on the attenuation parameters of blasting vibration velocity in jointed rock masses10.1007/s10064-018-01452-4 ↗
22. Blasting vibration waveform prediction method based on superposition principle
23. Assessment of induced vibrations derived from the wave superposition in time-delay blasts10.1016/j.ijrmms.2021.104814 ↗
24. Impact of orientation of blast initiation on ground vibrations10.1016/j.jrmge.2022.03.012 ↗
25. Uncertainty in measurements of vibrations from blasting10.1007/s00603-012-0229-y ↗
26. Yang, R., Kay, D., and Kim, G. (2014, January 9–12). Case examples of sensor coupling effect on blast vibration measurement and charge weight scaling plot. Proceedings of the ISEE Proceedings 40th Ann. Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, Denver, CO, USA.
27. Birch, W., Farnfield, R., and Hosein, S. (2014, January 9–12). Blast vibration monitoring & calibration in the 21st century. Proceedings of the ISEE Proceedings 40th Ann. Conference on Explosives and Blasting Technique, Denver, CO, USA.
28. Predicting ground vibrations due to mine blasting using a novel artificial neural network-based cuckoo search optimization10.1007/s11053-021-09823-7 ↗
29. Determination of the ground vibration attenuation law from a single blast: A particular case of trench blasting10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.03.016 ↗
30. Assessment of blast-induced vibration using various estimation models10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2018.05.004 ↗
31. Delay time optimization in blasting operations for mitigating the vibration-effects on final pit walls’ stability10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.04.004 ↗
32. Optimization of blasting design in open pit limestone mines with the aim of reducing ground vibration using robust techniques10.1007/s40948-020-00164-y ↗
33. Spectral prediction and control of blast vibrations during the excavation of high dam abutment slopes with millisecond-delay blasting10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.01.007 ↗
34. Study on internal vibration law and vibration reduction of xiaoxiku tunnel blasting
35. Waveform analysis in mitigation of blast-induced vibrations10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.08.004 ↗