Analytic Model for U-Nb Liquidus and U-6Nb Melting Curve
Source abstract
Abstract
Uranium–niobium (U-Nb) alloys, used in a variety of industrial and energy applications that require high density, ductility, and good corrosion resistance, comprise a highly complex, multiphasic system with a phase diagram well established through decades of extensive experimental and theoretical research. They are also one of the best candidates for a metallic fuel alloy with high-temperature strength sufficient to support the core, acceptable nuclear properties, good fabricability, and compatibility with usable coolant media. The key factor determining the performance and safety of a metallic fuel such as U-Nb is its operational limits in the application environment, which are closely related to material’s structure and thermodynamic stability. They are in turn closely related to the ambient (zero-pressure) melting point (Tm); thus, Tm is an important engineering parameter. However, the current knowledge of Tm of the U-Nb system is limited, as the only experimental study of its Nb-rich portion dates back to 1958. In addition, it has not yet been adequately modeled based on general thermodynamics principles or using an equation-of-state approach. In this study, we present a theoretical model for the melting curve (liquidus) of a mixture, and apply it to U-Nb, which is considered as a mixture of pure U and pure Nb. The model uses the known melting curves of pure constituents as an input and predicts the melting curve of their mixture. It has only one free parameter, which must be determined independently. The ambient liquidus of U-Nb predicted by the model appears to be in good agreement with the available experimental data. We calculate the melting curve (the pressure dependence of Tm) of pure U using ab initio quantum molecular dynamics (QMD), the knowledge of which is required for obtaining the model parameters for U. We also generalize the new model to nonzero pressure and consider the melting curve of U-6 wt.% Nb (U-6Nb) alloy as an example. The melting curve of U-6Nb alloy predicted by the model appears to be in good agreement with the ab initio melting curve obtained from our QMD simulations. We suggest that the U-18Nb alloy can be considered as a proxy for protactinium (Pa) and demonstrate that the melting curves of U-18Nb and Pa are in good agreement with each other.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nuclear Materials and Properties · Thermodynamic and Structural Properties of Metals and Alloys · Nuclear reactor physics and engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
Funding
US DOE/NNSA
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. Phase transformations in uranium +14 at.% niobium alloy10.1016/0001-6160(80)90173-X ↗
2. A phenomenological study of the shape memory effect in polycrystalline uranium-niobium alloys10.1007/BF02648337 ↗
3. Landa, A., Söderlind, P., and Wu, A. (2020). Phase stability in U-6Nb alloy doped with Ti from the first principles theory. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10103417 ↗
4. Corrosion of uranium and uranium alloys
5. Niobium-20 w/o uranium, high-temperature metallic fuel of the future10.13182/NSE61-A25880 ↗
6. Shape memory effects in a uranium+14 at.% niobium alloy10.1016/0036-9748(78)90106-0 ↗
7. Arblaster, J.W. (2018). Selected Values of the Crystallographic Properties of the Elements, ASM International.
8. Addessio, F.L., Zuo, Q.H., Mason, T.A., and Brinson, L.C. (2003). A model for High-Strain-Rate Deformation of Uranium-Niobium Alloys, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos preprint LA-14034-MS.10.1063/1.1576302 ↗
9. A constitutive model for a uranium-niobium alloy10.1063/1.2208907 ↗
10. The Nb-U (niobium-uranium) system10.1361/105497198770342265 ↗
11. Hackenberg, R.E. (2022). Liquid and Gamma-BCC Phase Equilibria in the Uranium-Niobium System: A Simple Thermodynamic Model for Phase Diagram and Other Predictions, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos Preprint LA-UR-22-27603; issued 2022-07-28.10.2172/1879342 ↗
12. Uranium-columbium alloy diagram
13. Uranium-columbium alloy diagram
14. Density and thermal expansion of liquid U-Nb alloys
15. Burakovsky, L., Preston, D.L., and Green, A.A. (2025). Liquidus curve of uranium-plutonium mixed oxide (MOX) system. Front. Nucl. Eng., 3.10.3389/fnuen.2024.1487828 ↗
16. The equation of state of platinum to 660 GPa (6.6 Mbar)10.1063/1.344177 ↗
17. Ab initio study of randomly disordered hexagonal close-packed (rhcp) phase in platinum10.1063/5.0235811 ↗
18. The Mo-W (molybdenum-tungsten) system10.1007/BF02868956 ↗
19. Baty, S., Burakovsky, L., and Preston, D. (2020). Topological equivalence of the phase diagrams of molybdenum and tungsten. Crystals, 10.10.3390/cryst10010020 ↗
20. Experimental and theoretical confirmation of an orthorhombic phase transition in niobium at high pressure and temperature10.1038/s43246-020-00058-2 ↗
21. The thermodynamic properties of the f-elements and their compounds. I. The lanthanide and actinide metals10.1063/1.3474238 ↗
22. On the coordination of thermodynamic properties on the melting line of a number of refractory metals
23. The melting temperature of uranium at high pressures10.1016/S0022-3697(73)80077-0 ↗
24. High-pressure melting temperatures of uranium: Laser-heating experiments and theoretical calculations10.1103/PhysRevB.48.15529 ↗
25. The melting curves of tin, uranium, cadmium, thallium and indium metals under pressure10.1016/j.chemphys.2021.111389 ↗
26. Analytic model of the Grüneisen parameter at all densities10.1016/j.jpcs.2003.10.076 ↗
27. Cold shear modulus and Grüneisen parameter at all densities10.1016/j.ssc.2004.07.066 ↗
28. Melting and critical superheating10.1103/PhysRevB.73.012201 ↗
29. High-pressure/high-temperature phase diagram of zinc10.1088/1361-648X/aacac0 ↗
30. Multiphase tin equation of state using density functional theory10.1103/PhysRevB.103.184102 ↗
31. Z methodology for phase diagram studies: Platinum and tantalum as examples10.1088/1742-6596/500/16/162001 ↗
32. Ab initio melting curve of osmium10.1103/PhysRevB.92.174105 ↗
33. Assessing a solids-biased density-gradient functional for actinide metals10.1103/PhysRevB.82.033102 ↗
34. High-pressure properties of solid and liquid uranium10.1016/0921-4526(93)90439-D ↗
35. Imhoff, S.D. (2021). Uranium Density, Thermal Conductivity, Specific Heat, and Thermal Diffusivity, Los Alamos National Laboratory. Los Alamos Preprint LA-UR-21-21810; issued 2021-02-24.10.2172/1768421 ↗
36. SGTE data for pure elements10.1016/0364-5916(91)90030-N ↗
37. Turchi, P.E.A. (2018). Thermodynamic, Kinetic, and Physical Properties of Nb-U (Niobium-Uranium), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. LLNL Preprint LLNL-TR-752281.10.2172/1459121 ↗
38. Pressure-induced changes in protactinium metal: Importance to actinide-metal bonding concepts10.1103/PhysRevB.67.134101 ↗