journal article·2025-03-25Open access

Enhanced MCDM Based on the TOPSIS Technique and Aggregation Operators Under the Bipolar pqr-Spherical Fuzzy Environment: An Application in Firm Supplier Selection

Zanyar A. Ameen, Hariwan Fadhil M. Salih, Amlak I. Alajlan, Ramadhan A. Mohammed, Baravan A. Asaad

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

Multiple criteria decision-making (MCDM) is a significant area of decision-making theory that certainly warrants attention. It might be difficult to accurately convey the necessary decision facts when navigating decision-making problems since we frequently run into complicated issues and unpredictable situations. To address this, introducing the novel idea of the bipolar pqr-spherical fuzzy set (BpqrSFS), a hybrid structure of the bipolar fuzzy set (BFS) and the pqr-spherical fuzzy set (pqr-SFS), is the main goal of this work. The fundamental (set-theoretic and algebraic) operations on BpqrSFSs are explained as well as their relations to several known models. A distance measure, such as Euclidean distance, among BpqrSFNs, is provided. Afterward, we expand the fundamental aggregation operators to the pqr-spherical fuzzy (BpqrSF) environment by developing bipolar pqr-spherical fuzzy-weighted averaging and bipolar pqr-spherical fuzzy-weighted geometric operators for aggregating BpqrSFNs. According to the aforementioned distance measure and operators, an MCDM approach is established consisting of two algorithms, namely, the TOPSIS method and the method using the proposed operators in the BpqrSF context. Moreover, a numerical example is provided in order to ensure that the presented model is applicable. By using the two algorithms, a comparative analysis of the proposed method with other existing ones is given in order to verify the feasibility of the suggested decision-making procedure.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Duhok, Duhok 42001, Iraq

Department of Mathematics, College of Science, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia

Department of Mathematics, College of Basic Education, University of Duhok, Duhok 42001, Iraq

Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Zakho, Zakho 42002, Iraq

Department of Computer Science, College of Science, Cihan University-Duhok, Duhok 42001, Iraq

References (45)

Show source-provided references
2. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets10.1016/S0165-0114(86)80034-3 ↗
3. Yager, R.R. (2013, January 24–28). Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. Proceedings of the 2013 joint IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS), Edmonton, AB, Canada.10.1109/IFSA-NAFIPS.2013.6608375 ↗
4. Generalized orthopair fuzzy sets10.1109/TFUZZ.2016.2604005 ↗
5. Dounis, A., and Stefopoulos, A. (2023). Intelligent Medical Diagnosis Reasoning Using Composite Fuzzy Relation, Aggregation Operators and Similarity Measure of q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Sets. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app132312553 ↗
6. Multiple attribute group decision making based on quasirung orthopair fuzzy sets: Application to electric vehicle charging station site selection problem10.1016/j.engappai.2022.105299 ↗
7. n,m-Rung orthopair fuzzy sets with applications to multicriteria decision making10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3207184 ↗
8. Picture fuzzy sets
9. An approach toward decision-making and medical diagnosis problems using the concept of spherical fuzzy sets10.1007/s00521-018-3521-2 ↗
10. Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method10.3233/JIFS-181401 ↗
11. Correlation coefficients for T-spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in clustering and multi-attribute decision making10.1007/s00500-019-03993-6 ↗
12. r,s,t-spherical fuzzy VIKOR method and its application in multiple criteria group decision making10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3271141 ↗
13. p,q-Spherical fuzzy sets and their aggregation operators with application to third-party logistic provider selection10.3233/JIFS-235297 ↗
14. Confidence Levels-Based p,q,r–Spherical Fuzzy Aggregation Operators and Their Application in Selection of Solar Panels10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3389296 ↗
15. Development p,q,r–Spherical Fuzzy Einstein Aggregation Operators: Application in Decision-Making in Logo Design10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3394694 ↗
16. Interval-valued (p,q,r)-spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in MCGDM and MCDM based on TOPSIS method and aggregation operators10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124575 ↗
17. Morphism of bipolar intuitionistic fuzzy graphs10.1080/09720529.2015.1013673 ↗
18. Bipolar Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their application based on multi-criteria decision-making problems
19. Novel approach to decision making based on type-II generalized fermatean bipolar fuzzy soft sets
20. Bipolar q-ROF hybrid decision making model with golden cut for analyzing the levelized cost of renewable energy alternatives10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3168315 ↗
21. Multi-attribute group decision-making based on bipolar n,m-rung orthopair fuzzy sets10.1007/s41066-023-00405-x ↗
22. Spherical bipolar fuzzy sets and its application in multi criteria decision making problem
23. An Approach Toward Pattern Recognition and Decision-Making Using the Concept of Bipolar T-Spherical Fuzzy Sets10.1007/s40815-023-01545-7 ↗
24. Multi-criteria decision making based on bipolar picture fuzzy operators and new distance measures
25. Spherical fuzzy sets and their applications in multi-attribute decision making problems10.3233/JIFS-172009 ↗
26. Fermatean fuzzy sets10.1007/s12652-019-01377-0 ↗
27. Methods for multiple attribute decision making10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9_3 ↗
28. A reconciliation among discrete compromise solutions10.1057/jors.1987.44 ↗
29. A new approach for multiple objective decision making10.1016/0305-0548(93)90109-V ↗
30. El Alaoui, M. (2021). Fuzzy TOPSIS: Logic, Approaches, and Case Studies, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003168416 ↗
31. Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology10.1007/s00170-013-5444-5 ↗
32. A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014 ↗
33. Yilmaz, I., and Ecemis Yilmaz, H.K. (2024). A consensus framework for evaluating dispute resolution alternatives in international law using an interval-valued type-2 fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app142311046 ↗
34. Picture fuzzy TOPSIS method based on CPFRS model: An application to risk management problems
35. Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis10.1007/s40314-019-0980-8 ↗
36. Calvo, T., Mayor, G., and Mesiar, R. (2002). Aggregation operators, Studies Fuzziness Soft Computing 97. Phys. Heidelb.10.1007/978-3-7908-1787-4 ↗
37. Grabisch, M., Marichal, J.L., Mesiar, R., and Pap, E. (2008, January 26–27). Aggregation Functions, Cambridge University Press. Proceedings of the 2008 6th International Symposium on Intelligent Systems and Informatics, Subotica, Serbia.
38. Yager, R.R., and Kacprzyk, J. (2012). The Ordered Weighted Averaging Operators: Theory and Applications, Springer Science & Business Media.10.1007/978-3-642-17910-5 ↗
39. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets10.1080/03081070600574353 ↗
40. Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators10.1109/TFUZZ.2006.890678 ↗
41. Picture fuzzy aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making10.3233/JIFS-161798 ↗
42. T-spherical fuzzy power aggregation operators and their applications in multi-attribute decision making10.1007/s12652-020-02600-z ↗
43. Group decision making based on Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS method10.1002/int.22103 ↗
44. Fermatean fuzzy TOPSIS-based approach for occupational risk assessment in manufacturing10.1007/s40747-021-00417-7 ↗
45. Pınar, A., Rouyendegh, B.D., and Özdemir, Y.S. (2021). q-Rung orthopair fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su13020985 ↗