LPBERT: A Protein–Protein Interaction Prediction Method Based on a Pre-Trained Language Model
Source abstract
Abstract
The prediction of protein–protein interactions is a key task in proteomics. Since protein sequences are easily available and understandable, they have become the primary data source for predicting protein–protein interactions. With the development of natural language processing technology, language models have become a research hotspot in recent years, and protein language models have also been developed accordingly. Compared with single-encoding methods, such as Word2Vec and one-hot, language models specifically designed for proteins are expected to extract more comprehensive information from sequences, thereby enhancing the performance of protein–protein interaction prediction methods. Inspired by the protein language model ProteinBERT, this study designed the LPBERT deep learning framework, which is a novel end-to-end deep learning architecture. LPBERT, which is based on ProteinBERT, combines Convolutional Neural Networks, Transformer encoders, and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory networks to achieve efficient prediction. Upon evaluation using the BioGRID H. sapiens and S. cerevisiae datasets, LPBERT outperformed other comparison methods, where it achieved accuracies of 98.93% and 97.94%, respectively. Moreover, it also demonstrated good performances on multiple other datasets. These experimental results indicate that LPBERT performed excellently in protein–protein interaction prediction tasks, thereby substantiating the effectiveness of introducing protein language models in this field.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks · Protein Structure and Dynamics · Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The School of Computer Science, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan 411105, China
References (45)
Show source-provided references
1. Ablation of gap junction protein improves the efficiency of nanozyme-mediated catalytic/starvation/mild-temperature photothermal therapy10.1002/adma.202210464 ↗
2. Interaction of the extracellular protease from Staphylococcus xylosus with meat proteins elucidated via spectroscopic and molecular docking10.1016/j.fochx.2024.101204 ↗
3. Regulation of cardiomyocyte intracellular trafficking and signal transduction by protein palmitoylation10.1042/BST20221296 ↗
4. Regulatory networks of the F-box protein FBX206 and OVATE family proteins modulate brassinosteroid biosynthesis to regulate grain size and yield in rice10.1093/jxb/erad397 ↗
5. Huang, J., and Ecker, G.F. (2023). A structure-based view on ABC-transporter linked to multidrug resistance. Molecules, 28.10.3390/molecules28020495 ↗
6. Unlocking mitochondrial drug targets: The importance of mitochondrial transport proteins10.1111/apha.14150 ↗
7. Interactions among members of the Bcl-2 protein family analyzed with a yeast two-hybrid system10.1073/pnas.91.20.9238 ↗
8. An in silico prediction of interaction models of influenza A virus PA and human C14orf166 protein from yeast-two-hybrid screening data10.1002/prot.26534 ↗
9. Identifying novel protein-protein interactions using co-immunoprecipitation and mass spectroscopy10.1002/0471142301.ns0528s46 ↗
10. Protein sequencing, one molecule at a time10.1146/annurev-biophys-102121-103615 ↗
11. Multifaceted protein–protein interaction prediction based on Siamese residual RCNN10.1093/bioinformatics/btz328 ↗
12. Xu, W., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., and Guan, J. (2021). Protein–protein interaction prediction based on ordinal regression and recurrent convolutional neural networks. BMC Bioinform., 22.10.1186/s12859-021-04369-0 ↗
13. DeepTrio: A ternary prediction system for protein–protein interaction using mask multiple parallel convolutional neural networks10.1093/bioinformatics/btab737 ↗
14. RAPPPID: Towards generalizable protein interaction prediction with AWD-LSTM twin networks10.1093/bioinformatics/btac429 ↗
15. Kudo, T. (2018). Sentencepiece: A simple and language independent subword tokenizer and detokenizer for neural text processing. arXiv.10.18653/v1/D18-2012 ↗
16. Merity, S., Keskar, N.S., and Socher, R. (2017). Regularizing and optimizing LSTM language models. arXiv.
17. Chen, W., Wang, S., Song, T., Li, X., Han, P., and Gao, C. (2022). DCSE: Double-Channel-Siamese-Ensemble model for protein protein interaction prediction. BMC Genom., 23.10.1186/s12864-022-08772-6 ↗
18. ADH-PPI: An attention-based deep hybrid model for protein-protein interaction prediction10.1016/j.isci.2022.105169 ↗
19. ECA-PHV: Predicting human-virus protein-protein interactions through an interpretable model of effective channel attention mechanism10.1016/j.chemolab.2024.105103 ↗
20. Song, B., Luo, X., Luo, X., Liu, Y., Niu, Z., and Zeng, X. (2022). Learning spatial structures of proteins improves protein–protein interaction prediction. Briefings Bioinform., 23.10.1093/bib/bbab558 ↗
21. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 ↗
22. SpatialPPI: Three-dimensional space protein-protein interaction prediction with AlphaFold Multimer10.1016/j.csbj.2024.03.009 ↗
23. Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., and Yim, J. (2021). Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv.10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 ↗
24. Evaluating protein transfer learning with TAPE
25. Prottrans: Toward understanding the language of life through self-supervised learning10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3095381 ↗
26. Biological structure and function emerge from scaling unsupervised learning to 250 million protein sequences10.1073/pnas.2016239118 ↗
27. ProteinBERT: A universal deep-learning model of protein sequence and function10.1093/bioinformatics/btac020 ↗
28. Dang, T.H., and Vu, T.A. (2024). xCAPT5: Protein–protein interaction prediction using deep and wide multi-kernel pooling convolutional neural networks with protein language model. BMC Bioinform., 25.10.1186/s12859-024-05725-6 ↗
29. Elnaggar, A., Ding, W., Jones, L., Gibbs, T., Feher, T., Angerer, C., Severini, S., Matthes, F., and Rost, B. (2021). Codetrans: Towards cracking the language of silicon’s code through self-supervised deep learning and high performance computing. arXiv.
30. Chen, T., and Guestrin, C. (2016, January 13–17). Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM Sigkdd International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
31. Liu, T., Gao, H., Ren, X., Xu, G., Liu, B., Wu, N., Luo, H., Wang, Y., Tu, T., and Yao, B. (2023). Protein–protein interaction and site prediction using transfer learning. Briefings Bioinform., 24.10.1093/bib/bbad376 ↗
32. Vaswani, A. (2017). Attention is all you need. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30.
33. Boutet, E., Lieberherr, D., Tognolli, M., Schneider, M., Bansal, P., Bridge, A.J., Poux, S., Bougueleret, L., and Xenarios, I. (2016). UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot, the manually annotated section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase: How to use the entry view. Plant Bioinformatics: Methods and Protocols, Humana Press.10.1007/978-1-4939-3167-5_2 ↗
34. Language models enable zero-shot prediction of the effects of mutations on protein function
35. Mikolov, T. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv.
36. seq2vec: Analyzing sequential data using multi-rank embedding vectors10.1016/j.elerap.2020.101003 ↗
37. Bjorck, N., Gomes, C.P., Selman, B., and Weinberger, K.Q. (2018). Understanding batch normalization. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 31.
38. Siami-Namini, S., Tavakoli, N., and Namin, A.S. (2019). The performance of LSTM and BiLSTM in forecasting time series. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data), Los Angeles, CA, USA, 9–12 December 2019, IEEE.10.1109/BigData47090.2019.9005997 ↗
39. The BioGRID database: A comprehensive biomedical resource of curated protein, genetic, and chemical interactions10.1002/pro.3978 ↗
40. An integration of deep learning with feature embedding for protein–protein interaction prediction10.7717/peerj.7126 ↗
41. Xie, S., Xie, X., Zhao, X., Liu, F., Wang, Y., Ping, J., and Ji, Z. (2023). HNSPPI: A hybrid computational model combing network and sequence information for predicting protein–protein interaction. Briefings Bioinform., 24.10.1093/bib/bbad261 ↗
42. Li, X., Han, P., Wang, G., Chen, W., Wang, S., and Song, T. (2022). SDNN-PPI: Self-attention with deep neural network effect on protein-protein interaction prediction. BMC Genom., 23.10.1186/s12864-022-08687-2 ↗
43. DeepCF-PPI: Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions by combining learned and handcrafted features based on attention mechanisms10.1007/s10489-022-04387-2 ↗
44. Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)—Round XIV10.1002/prot.26237 ↗
45. Transfer learning via multi-scale convolutional neural layers for human–virus protein–protein interaction prediction10.1093/bioinformatics/btab533 ↗