journal article·2025-03-12Open access

Script-Based Material and Geometrical Modeling of Steel–Concrete Composite Connections for Comprehensive Analysis Under Varied Configurations

Dániel Gosztola, Péter Grubits, János Szép, Majid Movahedi Rad

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 6

Abstract

The behavior of steel–concrete composite structures is significantly influenced by the efficiency of the shear connections that link the two materials. This research examines the performance of stud shear connectors, with an emphasis on analyzing the effect of different geometric design parameters. A computational model was created utilizing Python 3.13 to enable thorough digital monitoring of the influence of these parameters on the structural performance of composite connections. Developed within the ABAQUS framework, the model integrates geometric nonlinearity and the Concrete Damage Plasticity (CDP) approach to achieve detailed simulation of structural behavior. Essential design aspects, including stud diameter, stud height, head dimensions, and spacing in both longitudinal and transverse directions, were analyzed. The Python-based parametric model allows for easy modification of design parameters, ensuring efficiency and minimizing modeling errors. The significance of stud diameter changes was analyzed in accordance with Eurocode standards and previous studies. It was found that stud length has a reduced effect on structural performance, particularly when considering the concrete properties used in bridge construction, where compressive failure of the concrete zone is more critical at lower concrete strengths. Additional factors, such as stud head dimensions, were investigated but were found to have minimal effect on the behavior of steel–concrete composite connections. Longitudinal stud spacing emerged as a critical factor influencing structural performance, with optimal results achieved at a spacing of 13d. Spacings of 2d, 3d, and 4d demonstrated overlapping effects, leading to significant performance reductions, as indicated by comparisons of ultimate load and force–displacement responses. For transverse spacing, closer stud arrangements proved effective in reducing the likelihood of slip at the steel–concrete interface, enhancing composite action, and lowering stress concentrations. Additionally, reducing the transverse distance between studs allowed for the use of more shear connectors, increasing redundancy and enhancing performance, especially with grouped-stud connectors (GSCs).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Structural Load-Bearing Analysis · Fire effects on concrete materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Széchenyi István University, H-9026 Győr, Hungary

References (45)

Show source-provided references
1. Investigation of stud shear connectors for composite concrete and steel T-beams
2. Behaviour of Headed Studs in Composite Beams: Push-Out Tests10.1139/l88-032 ↗
3. Shear Strength of Thin Flange Composite Specimens10.62913/engj.v5i2.100 ↗
4. An experimental study of the use of high strength friction-grip bolts as shear connectors in composite beams
5. Experimental study on impact behavior of stud shear connectors between concrete slab and steel beam10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001945 ↗
6. Johnson, R.P. (2018). Composite Structures of Steel and Concrete: Beams, Slabs, Columns and Frames for Buildings, Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781119401353 ↗
7. The shear stiffness of stud shear connections in composite beams10.1016/0143-974X(86)90008-8 ↗
8. Flexural Strength of Steel-Concrete Composite Beams10.1061/JSDEAG.0001257 ↗
9. Shear strength of stud connectors in lightweight and normal weight concrete10.62913/engj.v8i2.160 ↗
10. (2004). Eurocode 4: Design of Composite and Concrete Structures–Part 1-1: General Rules and Rules for Buildings (Standard No. EN 1994-1-1:2004).
11. Steel-concrete interface behavior and analysis for push-out
12. FE validation of push-out tests using bolts as shear connectors
13. Lin, J.P., Wang, J.F., and Xu, R.Q. (2014). Cohesive Zone Model Based Numerical Analysis of Steel-Concrete Composite Structure Push-Out Tests. Math. Prob. Eng., 175483.10.1155/2014/175483 ↗
14. Shear capacity of stud shear connectors with initial damage: Experiment, FEM model and theoretical formulation
15. The strength of stud shear connections in composite beams
16. Meng, H., Wang, W., and Xu, R. (2023). A Trilinear Model for the Load–Slip Behavior of Headed Stud Shear Connectors. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16031173 ↗
17. Driscoll, G.G., and Slutter, R.G. (1961). Research on Composite Design at Lehigh University. Proceedings of the National Engineering Conference, American Institute of Steel Construction.
18. Push-out tests on studs in high strength and normal strength concrete10.1016/0143-974X(94)00036-H ↗
19. Du, W., Hu, Z., and Zhou, Z. (2024). Analytical Study of Stud Shear Connector Behavior in Steel–UHPC Composite Structures. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14123807 ↗
20. Behavior and strength of headed stud shear connectors in ultra-high performance concrete of composite bridges10.1007/s11709-019-0542-6 ↗
21. Numerical analysis of frictional contact effects in push-out tests10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.025 ↗
22. Khaleel, I.S., and Movahedi, R.M. (2023). Limited Optimal Plastic Behavior of RC Beams Strengthened by Carbon Fiber Polymers Using Reliability-Based Design. Polymers, 15.10.3390/polym15030569 ↗
23. Movahedi, R.M., Papp, F., Ibrahim, S.K., Szép, J., Gosztola, D., and Harrach, D. (2023). Elasto-plastic analysis and optimal design of composite integral abutment bridge extended with limited residual plastic deformation. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-023-32787-y ↗
24. Headed stud shear connector for thin ultrahigh-performance concrete bridge deck10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.02.001 ↗
25. Static behavior of large stud shear connectors in steel UHPC composite structures10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.07.058 ↗
26. Static and fatigue behavior of shortheaded studs embedded in a thin ultrahigh-performance concrete layer10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0001031 ↗
27. FEM analysis of failure development of group studs shear connector under effects of concrete strength and stud dimension10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.023 ↗
28. Finite Element Modeling of Push-out Tests for Large Stud Shear Connectors10.1016/j.jcsr.2009.06.010 ↗
29. A Study of the Grouped Arrangements of Stud Connectors on Shear Strength Behavior
30. Push-out experiments of headed shear studs in group arrangements
31. Parametrical static analysis on group studs with typical push-out tests10.1016/j.jcsr.2011.10.029 ↗
32. Studying the effect of shear stud distribution on the behavior of steel–reactive powder concrete composite beams using ABAQUS software10.1515/jmbm-2022-0046 ↗
33. Experimental study on grouped stud shear connectors in precast steel-UHPC composite bridge10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112479 ↗
34. Lu, W., Huang, Y., and Xu, W. (2023). Study on the Shear Resistance Performance of Grouped Stud Connectors. Materials, 16.10.20944/preprints202309.0046.v1 ↗
35. Shear behavior of shear stud groups in precast concrete decks10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.02.002 ↗
36. Static behavior of grouped large headed stud-UHPC shear connectors in composite structures10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.038 ↗
37. Numerical study and proposal of new design equations for steel decking concrete slabs subjected to fire10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113828 ↗
38. Gosztola, D., Cucuzza, R., Szép, J., Domaneschi, M., Ghodousian, O., and Movahedi, R.M. (2024). Plastic Limited Numerical Modelling on Contact Friction Effects of Steel–Concrete Connection for Composite Bridges. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14092898 ↗
39. Nonlinear finite element analysis of concrete structures10.1016/0045-7825(79)90027-6 ↗
40. FEM analysis of push-out test response of Hybrid Steel Trussed Concrete Beams (HSTCBs)10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.04.011 ↗
41. Liu, H., Lei, H., Huang, Y., Chen, Y., and Xu, F. (2024). Seismic Performance of Wall-Type Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Column to H-Beam Connections with Internal Diaphragms. Buildings, 14.10.3390/buildings14061741 ↗
42. Li, J.-P., Zhang, L.-Y., Zhu, Y.-J., Zhao, G., Liu, F.-Z., and Zhang, T. (2025). Finite Element Analysis of the Flexural Behavior of Steel Plate–High-Performance Concrete (HPC) Slab and Beam Composite Structures. Buildings, 15.10.3390/buildings15010027 ↗
43. CFT Connections: State of the art Report and Numerical Validation by 3D FEM10.1007/s13296-024-00852-5 ↗
44. Khotsianovsky, A., and Chen, Y. (2024). The Effect of the Friction Coefficient Between the Steel-Concrete Connection on the Horizontal Load Capacity. Material Strength and Applied Mechanics: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference (MSAM 2024), IOS Press.
45. Experimental analysis on the structural continuity effect in steel decking concrete slabs subjected to fire10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112299 ↗