A Novel Methodology for Planning Urban Road Safety Interventions
Source abstract
Abstract
Improving road safety is a major challenge for urban administrations due to the high frequency of accidents and their associated social costs. This study presents a methodology that combines historical accident data analysis with a proactive risk assessment approach to enhance decision-making in road safety planning. Using the International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP) and Geographic Information Systems (GIS), the proposed framework identifies high-risk locations and estimates the benefits of planned safety interventions. A key innovation of this methodology is the integration of cost–benefit analysis to prioritize interventions, ensuring optimal resource allocation. The approach was tested in a medium-sized Italian city where it helped identify critical areas and assess the potential impact of various safety measures, such as intersection redesign and traffic-calming strategies. The results demonstrated a significant potential to reduce accidents and associated social costs, offering a scalable model for urban road safety planning. By integrating data-driven insights with proactive evaluation, this methodology supports urban administrations in implementing effective, targeted interventions that contribute to Vision Zero goals.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Traffic and Road Safety · Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety · Traffic control and management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, 20133 Milan, Italy
Polinomia Srl, Via G. Borgazzi 17, 20900 Monza, Italy
References (32)
Show source-provided references
1. World Health Organization (WHO) (2023). Global Status Report on Road Safety 2023, WHO.
2. Parlamento Europeo (2024, September 01). Relazione sul Quadro Strategico dell’UE per la Sicurezza Stradale 2021–2030, Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-9-2021-0211_IT.html.
3. MIMS—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e della Mobilità Sostenibili (2021). Piano Nazionale Sicurezza Stradale 2030 Indirizzi Generali e Linee Guida di Attuazione, MIMS.
4. Istat—Istituto Nazione di Statistica, and ACI—Automobile Club d’Italia (2024). Incidenti Stradali—Anno 2023, Ufficio Stampa ISTAT.
5. Pernetti, M., Antoniazzi, A., Ketabdari, M., Crispino, M., and Toraldo, E. (2024). Determining the Safety Level of State Roads: An Italian Case Study. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14156663 ↗
6. AASHTO—American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2012). Highway Safety Manual, AASHTO.
7. MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2012). Linee Guida per la Gestione della Sicurezza delle Infrastrutture Stradali—D.Lgs n.35/11, MIT.
8. Jonker, A. (2024, October 01). Che cos’è un Sistema Informativo Geografico (GIS)?. 2023., Available online: https://www.ibm.com/it-it/topics/geographic-information-system.
9. Black spot determination of traffic accident locations and its spatial association characteristic analysis based on GIS
10. Finding critical scenarios for automated driving systems: A systematic mapping study10.1109/TSE.2022.3170122 ↗
11. Crash patterns at signalized intersections10.3141/2514-12 ↗
12. Tarko, A.P., Thomaz, J., and Romero, M. (2019). Collision Diagram Builder: Phase II Corridor Edition (Joint Transportation Research Program Publication No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2019/27), Purdue University.10.5703/1288284317107 ↗
13. iRAP–International Road Assessment Programme (2025, February 11). ViDA User Guide. Available online: www.irap.org/specifications.
14. Application of the IRAP method combined with GIS to improve road safety on new highway projects in Algeria10.3311/PPtr.19026 ↗
15. The integrated methodology for assessing the safety of the road network infrastructure in Romania10.1088/1757-899X/1311/1/012043 ↗
16. Sensitivity analysis of the calibration factor resulting from the application of the HSM predictive method to Italian rural two-lane, two-way roads. The Emilia-Romagna case study10.1016/j.rineng.2024.102258 ↗
17. Peltola, H. (2009, January 6–17). Evaluating road safety and safety effects using Empirical Bayesian method. Proceedings of the 4th IRTAD Conference, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
18. The predictive validity of empirical Bayes estimates of road safety10.1016/j.aap.2008.07.007 ↗
19. Karamanlis, I., Nikiforiadis, A., Botzoris, G., Kokkalis, A., and Basbas, S. (2023). Towards Sustainable Transportation: The Role of Black Spot Analysis in Improving Road Safety. Sustainability, 15.10.3390/su151914478 ↗
20. A new model for determining the traffic accident black spots using GIS-aided spatial statistical methods10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.031 ↗
21. Job, R.S. (2012, January 4–6). Advantages and disadvantages of reactive (black spot) and proactive (road rating) approaches to road safety engineering treatments: When should each be used. Proceedings of the Australasian Road Safety Research Policing Education Conference, Wellington, New Zealand.
22. Systematic review, evaluation and comparison of different approaches for the implementation of road network safety analysis10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28391 ↗
23. Identification of hazardous locations in regional road network–Comparison of reactive and proactive approaches10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.392 ↗
24. Social costs of road crashes: An international analysis10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.005 ↗
25. Quantitative analysis of the social costs of road traffic crashes literature10.1016/j.aap.2021.106282 ↗
26. European Commission (2023). Network Wide Road Safety Assessment—Methodology and Implementation Handbook, Publications Office of the European Union. [1st ed.].
27. Drapala, J. (2024, October 01). Kernel Density Estimator Explained Step by Step. Towards Data Science. Available online: https://towardsdatascience.com/kernel-density-estimation-explained-step-by-step-7cc5b5bc4517/.
28. MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2010). Studio di Valutazione dei Costi Sociali Dell’Incidentalità.
29. Baldassarre, G., Bruzzone, S., Grande, A., Pennisi, L., and De Blasi, F. (2022, January 27–28). Social costs of road accidents in Italy. Proceedings of the 7th IRTAD Conference–Better Road Safety Data for Better Safety Outcomes, Lyon, France.
30. Biblus (2024, September 10). Spese Generali: Cosa Sono e Come Gestirle. Available online: https://biblus.acca.it/spese-generali-cosa-sono-e-come-gestirle/.
31. Biblus (2024, September 12). Analisi dei Prezzi: Concetti di Base ed Esempio con PriMus. Available online: https://biblus.acca.it/analisi-prezzi/.
32. MIT—Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti (2001). Decreto Ministeriale nr 6792 del 05/11/2001.