Improving the Performance Prediction of Process Simulation Models for TBM Tunneling Using Real-Time Project Data
Source abstract
Abstract
The planning of production, logistics, and maintenance in mechanized tunneling relies on project-specific conditions and assumptions about numerous production parameters. Analyzing multiple scenarios for TBM production is crucial for ensuring robust project flow. Process simulation models are valuable for this analysis. However, deviations from the plan often occur due to uncertainties in initial assumptions and unforeseen events during construction, especially given the variable ground conditions in TBM tunneling. This paper presents a concept for adapting offline simulation models used in the planning phase for real-time optimization by integrating actual project data. Continuously updating these models with new data from the construction site improves performance predictions. The concept involves integrating current construction progress into the simulation model and updating the originally assumed input data with project-specific actual data. An example study demonstrates the continuous adjustment of a simulation model and its impact on project duration prognosis. The enhancement of the prognosis by integrating real-time data is investigated, and an initial assessment of the earliest possible time for an update is made. The benefits of using real-time data in process simulation during construction are discussed, highlighting the improved accuracy in performance prediction and the potential for more efficient project management.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tunneling and Rock Mechanics · Drilling and Well Engineering · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
BUNG-PEB Tunnelbau-Ingenieure GmbH, Stockumer Straße 475, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
Institute for Tunnelling and Construction Management, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
Chair of Computing in Engineering, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universitätsstraße 150, 44801 Bochum, Germany
Funding
German Research Foundation (DFG)
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. Analysis and prediction of TBM performance in blocky rock conditions at the Lötschberg Base Tunnel10.1016/j.tust.2012.06.015 ↗
2. Farrokh, E. (2013). Study of Utilization Factor and Advance Rate of Hard Rock TBMs. [Ph.D. Thesis, The Pennsylvania State University].
3. A model to predict daily advance rates of EPB-TBMs in a complex geology in Istanbul10.1016/j.tust.2016.11.008 ↗
4. Predicting TBM utilization factor using discrete event simulation models10.1016/j.tust.2019.01.017 ↗
5. Duhme, R. (2018). Deterministic and Simulation Based Planning Approaches for Advance and Logistic Processes in Mechanized Tunneling. [Doctoral Dissertation, Ruhr-Universität Bochum].
6. Ulusay, R., Aydan, Ö., Gerçek, H., Hindistan, M.A., and Tuncay, E. (2016). TBM performance prediction in basalt and pyroclastic rocks of Deccan traps, a case study of Maroshi-Ruparel water supply tunnel. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Proceedings of the 2016 ISRM International Symposium, EUROCK 2016, Cappadocia, Turkey, 29–31 August 2016, CRC Press.
7. Leistungsprognose von Erddruckschilden im Lockergestein10.1002/geot.200900014 ↗
8. Predicting TBM performance in soft sedimentary rocks, case study of Zagros mountains water tunnel projects10.1016/j.tust.2020.103705 ↗
9. Gao, X., Song, X., Shi, M., Zhang, C., and Zhang, H. (2021). Real-time Forecast Models for TBM Load Parameters Based on Machine Learning Methods. arXiv.
10. An AIoT-based system for real-time monitoring of tunnel construction10.1016/j.tust.2020.103766 ↗
11. Li, L., Liu, Z., Fang, X., and Qi, W. (2024). Multi-step real-time prediction of hard-rock TBM penetration rate combining temporal convolutional network and squeeze-and-excitation block. Sci. Rep., 14.10.1038/s41598-024-65351-3 ↗
12. Modelling TBM performance with artificial neural networks10.1016/j.tust.2004.02.128 ↗
13. Salimi, A., Moormann, C., Singh, T.N., and Jain, P. (2015, January 2–5). TBM Performance Prediction in Rock Tunneling Using Various Artificial Intelligence Algorithms. Proceedings of the 11th Iranian and 2nd Regional Tunnelling Conference “Tunnels and the Future”, Tehran, Iran.
14. Dynamic prediction of mechanized shield tunneling performance10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103958 ↗
15. Pham, H.V., Yuji, F., and Kamei, K. (2011, January 20–22). Hybrid Artificial Neural Networks for TBM performance prediction in complex underground conditions. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration (SII 2011), Kyoto, Japan.10.1109/SII.2011.6147611 ↗
16. Application of rock mass classification systems for performance estimation of rock TBMs using regression tree and artificial intelligence algorithms10.1016/j.tust.2019.103046 ↗
17. TBM construction process simulation and performance optimization10.1007/s12209-010-0035-0 ↗
18. Simulation modeling and sensitivity analysis of a tunneling construction project’s supply chain10.1108/09699981011074600 ↗
19. Analytische und Simulationsbasierte Planungsansätze im mechanisierten Tunnelbau/Analytic and simulation based planning approcahes in mechanized tunneling10.37544/0005-6650-2020-06-74 ↗
20. Peila, D., Viggiani, G., and Celestino, T. (2020). Simulation of TBM operation to assess the impact of geology on the muck transportation. Tunnels and Underground Cities: Engineering and Innovation meet Archaeology, Architecture and Art, CRC Press.10.1201/9781003031611 ↗
21. Tahernia, T. (2023). Estimation of the Utilization Rate for Pressurized Face Shielded TBMS Using Discrete Event Simulation. [Doctoral Dissertation, Colorado School of Mines].
22. Using Simulation to Plan Tunnel Construction10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000626 ↗
23. Automated geological model updates during TBM operation—An approach based on probabilistic machine learning concepts10.1002/geot.202200053 ↗
24. Numerical-based approach for updating simulation input in real-time10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000948 ↗
25. A BIM-based multi-model framework for advancing TBM performance—Part 1: Real-time prediction of thrust force10.1016/j.tust.2024.105856 ↗
26. Updating the Decision Aids10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2002)128:1(40) ↗
27. A new statistical approach to automated quality control in manufacturing processes10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.06.001 ↗
28. Bradley, R., Bergman, J.J., Noble, J.S., and McGarvey, R.G. (2015, January 6–9). Evaluating a bayesian approach to demand forecasting with simulation. Proceedings of the 2015 Winter Simulation Conference, Huntington Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/WSC.2015.7408304 ↗
29. Ingalls, R.G. (2004, January 5–8). Simulation Input Updating Using Bayesian Techniques. Proceedings of the 2004 Winter Simulation Conference, Washington, DC, USA.
30. Bayesian Inference with Markov Chain Monte Carlo-Based Numerical Approach for Input Model Updating10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000862 ↗
31. Adaptive real-time tracking and simulation of heavy construction operations for look-ahead scheduling10.1016/j.autcon.2012.05.007 ↗
32. Digitalisierung und IoT im maschinellen Tunnelbau—Ein integraler Ansatz10.1002/geot.202000034 ↗
33. Decision Support System for an Intelligent Operator of Utility Tunnel Boring Machines10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103880 ↗
34. Jodehl, A. (2024). Vortriebsbegleitende Anwendung von Prozesssimulationen im Maschinellen Tunnelbau zur Aktualisierung der Leistungsprognose und Optimierung von Logistikprozessen. [Doctoral Dissertation, Ruhr University Bochum].
35. Villeneuve, M.C. (2022). Simulation-based approach using real-time data analysis to improve performance predictions in mechanised tunnelling. Tunnel Boring Machines in Difficult Grounds, Proceedings of the TBM DiGs Conference 2022, Leoben, Austria, 23–24 November 2022, Montanuniversität Leoben.
36. VDI Zentrum Ressourceneffizienz (2021, July 02). Grundlagen zur Echtzeitdatenerfassung Und-Verarbeitung. Available online: https://www.ressource-deutschland.de/themen/echtzeitdaten/grundlagen/.
37. Data preparation for data mining10.1080/713827180 ↗
38. Systematic literature review of preprocessing techniques for imbalanced data10.1049/iet-sen.2018.5193 ↗
39. Big data preprocessing: Methods and prospects10.1186/s41044-016-0014-0 ↗
40. On the choice of the best imputation methods for missing values considering three groups of classification methods10.1007/s10115-011-0424-2 ↗
41. A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies10.1023/B:AIRE.0000045502.10941.a9 ↗
42. Rousseeuw, P.J., and Leroy, A.M. (2005). Robust Regression and Outlier Detection, Wiley-Interscience.
43. Barnett, V., and Lewis, T. (1994). Outliers in Statistical Data, Wiley. [3rd ed.].
44. Kotu, V., and Deshpande, B. (2015). Time Series Forecasting. Predictive Analytics and Data Mining: Concepts and Practice with Rapidminer, Elsevier MK Morgan Kaufmann.10.1016/B978-0-12-801460-8.00010-0 ↗
45. Conrads, A. (2019). Maintenance of Cutting Tools in Mechanised Tunnelling—Development of a Process Simulation Model for the Scheduling and Evaluation of Maintenance Strategies. [Doctoral Dissertation, Ruhr University Bochum].
46. Salloum, Y., Jodehl, A., Thewes, M., and König, M. (2020, January 18–20). From Forecasting to Real-Time Process Controlling with Continuous Simulation Model Updates. Proceedings of the 37th CIB W78 Information Technology for Construction Conference 2020, São Paulo, Brazil.10.46421/2706-6568.37.2020.paper032 ↗
47. Simphony Supply Chain Simulator: A simulation toolkit to model the supply chain of construction projects10.1177/0037549710380992 ↗
48. Simulation-Based Analysis of Integrated Production and Jobsite Logistics in Mechanized Tunneling10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000584 ↗
49. Evaluation of Disturbances in Mechanized Tunneling Using Process Simulation10.1111/mice.12143 ↗
50. Robustness evaluation of cutting tool maintenance planning for soft ground tunneling projects10.1016/j.undsp.2018.01.005 ↗