journal article·2025-02-13Open access

Research on the Time Series Prediction of Acoustic Emission Parameters Based on the Factor Analysis–Particle Swarm Optimization Back Propagation Model

Xuebin Xie, Meng Wang

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 4

Abstract

Early warning for rock blasting is crucial for ensuring the safety of deep underground engineering. Existing methods primarily focus on classifying rock blasting levels, which makes it difficult to provide timely warnings. This paper proposes a novel early warning framework for rock blasting based on time series prediction of acoustic emission (AE) parameters. Based on uniaxial rock tests, ten AE parameters (rise time, ring count, energy, duration, amplitude, average frequency, RMS voltage, average signal level, peak frequency, and initial frequency) are identified as potential indicators for rock blasting early warning. These ten parameters collectively affect the accuracy of AE monitoring. Factor analysis is employed to process the normalized AE data, simplifying the data structure and identifying common variables. Additionally, it is found that the BP neural network optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) is more suitable for predicting the future evolution of these AE parameters. This makes it possible to establish a comprehensive multi-indicator early warning system. The proposed framework provides a new perspective for rock blasting early warning systems.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Evaluation Methods in Various Fields · Advanced Sensor and Control Systems · Advanced Algorithms and Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. Hoek, E., Kaiser, P.K., and Bawden, W.F. (2000). Support of Underground Excavations in Hard Rock, Taylor and Francis, CRC Press.10.1201/b16978 ↗
2. Analysis of rockburst triggered by hard rock fragmentation using a conical pick under high uniaxial stress10.1016/j.tust.2019.103195 ↗
3. A comprehensive review of intelligent machine learning based predicting methods in long-term and short-term rock burst prediction10.1016/j.tust.2023.105434 ↗
4. Analysis of compression failure and acoustic emission characteristics of limestone under permeability-stress coupling
5. Ohtsu, M., and Grosse, C. (2008). Acoustic Emission Testing: Basics for Research-Applications in Civil Engineering, Springer.
6. Failure mechanism and infrared radiation characteristic of hard siltstone induced by stratification effect10.1007/s11629-023-8444-4 ↗
7. Glazer, S. (2016). Mine Seismology: Data Analysis and Interpretation, Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-32612-2 ↗
8. Experiment on Rockburst Process of Borehole and Its Acoustic Emission Characteristics10.1007/s00603-018-1613-z ↗
9. True-Triaxial Experimental Study of the Evolutionary Features of the Acoustic Emissions and Sounds of Rockburst Processes10.1007/s00603-017-1344-6 ↗
10. Study on main Frequency precursor characteristics of Acoustic Emission from Deep buried Dali Rock explosion10.1007/s12517-019-4706-4 ↗
11. Precursor of Spatio-temporal Evolution Law of MS and AE Activities for Rock Burst Warning in Steeply Inclined and Extremely Thick Coal Seams Under Caving Mining Conditions10.1007/s00603-018-1690-z ↗
12. Experimental investigation of true triaxial unloading rockburst precursors based on critical slowing-down theory10.1007/s10064-023-03092-9 ↗
13. Rockburst prediction using particle swarm optimization algorithm and general regression neural network
14. Zhao, Z., and Gross, L. (2017, January 24–29). Using supervised machine learning to distinguish microseismic from noise events. Proceedings of the SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, Houston, TX, USA.10.1190/segam2017-17727697.1 ↗
15. Prediction of rockburst risk in coal mines based on a locally weighted C4.5 algorithm10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3053001 ↗
16. Short-term rockburst risk prediction using ensemble learning methods10.1007/s11069-020-04255-7 ↗
17. Rock-burst occurrence prediction based on optimized Naïve Bayes models10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3089205 ↗
18. Rock burst prediction probability model based on case analysis10.1016/j.tust.2019.103069 ↗
19. Predicting rockburst with database using particle swarm optimization and extreme learning machine10.1016/j.tust.2020.103287 ↗
20. Rockburst prediction based on oversampling and objective weighting method
21. Enhancing machine learning algorithms to assess rock burst phenomena10.1007/s10706-021-01867-z ↗
22. Real-time prediction of rockburst intensity using an integrated CNN-Adam-BO algorithm based on microseismic data and its engineering application10.1016/j.tust.2021.104133 ↗
23. Feasibility of stochastic gradient boosting approach for predicting rockburst damage in burst-prone mines10.1016/S1003-6326(16)64312-1 ↗
24. Using machine learning approach for microseismic events recognition in underground excavations: Comparison of ten frequently-used models10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105519 ↗
25. Rockburst prediction model using machine learning based on microseismic parameters of Qinling water conveyance tunnel10.1007/s11771-023-5233-8 ↗
26. Time series prediction of microseismic multi-parameter related to rockburst based on deep learning10.1007/s00603-021-02614-9 ↗
27. Rock burst precursor electromagnetic radiation signal recognition method and early warning application based on recurrent neural networks10.1007/s00603-020-02314-w ↗
28. Comprehensive early warning method of microseismic, acoustic emission, and electromagnetic radiation signals of rock burst based on deep learning10.1016/j.ijrmms.2023.105519 ↗
29. Rockburst time warning method with blasting cycle as the unit based on microseismic information time series: A case study10.1007/s10064-023-03141-3 ↗