Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 Low-Cycle Fatigue Performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Inconel 718 is one of the most used alloys within the aerospace gas turbine industry. The acceptance of Inconel 718 within the aerospace gas turbine industry has largely been due to its high strength and fatigue capabilities up to 677 °C (1250 °F). This alloy is traditionally produced through conventional manufacturing methods, such as casting, wrought, and sheet forming. The various traditional manufacturing methods of this alloy have been well understood and characterized for use in critical components. However, Inconel 718 can also be produced with non-traditional manufacturing methods, such as by additive manufacturing. Producing Inconel 718 by additive manufacturing has the opportunity to design more complex components that provide distinct advantages over conventionally produced components. However, prior to implementing additively manufactured Inconel 718 within the aerospace gas turbine industry, there needs to be a complete understanding of the material’s performance. In an effort to completely characterize additively manufactured Inconel 718, this study focuses on the characterization of the alloy’s low-cycle fatigue performance. Specimens were produced via the laser powder bed fusion process in a vertical orientation. Both as-printed surfaces and fully machined surface specimens were evaluated at 24 °C (75 °F) and 538 °C (1000 °F). Fractography analysis was then completed on the specimens to understand differences in the crack initiation and propagation with respect to test temperatures and surface conditions. Based on these tests, it was shown that the fatigue life knockdown due to the as-printed surface conditions was 62.8% at 538 °C (1000 °F) versus only 8.5% at 24 °C (75 °F). These findings are discussed in detail within this article, and future work is proposed.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008, USA
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Xu, J., Fei, Y., Zhu, Y., Yu, W., Yao, D., and Zhou, J.G. (2024). A Review of Non-Powder-Bed Metal Additive Manufacturing: Techniques and Challenges. Materials, 17.10.3390/ma17194717 ↗
2. A Review of Metal Fabricated with Laser- and Powder-Bed Based Additive Manufacturing Techniques: Process, Nomenclature, Materials, Achievable Properties, and Its Utilization in the Medical Sector10.1002/adem.201700658 ↗
3. Review on the Evolution and Technology of State-of-the-Art Metal Additive Manufacturing Processes10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.567 ↗
4. (2012). Standard Terminology for Additive Manufacturing Technologies (Standard No. ASTM Standard F2792, 2012a).
5. Influence of Laser Processing Parameters on Porosity in Inconel 718 during Additive Manufacturing10.1007/s00170-019-03655-9 ↗
6. Assessment of Mechanical Properties and Fatigue Performance of a Selective Laser Melted Nickel-Base Superalloy Inconel 71810.1016/j.msea.2019.05.007 ↗
7. Mapping the Path to Certification of Metal Laser Powder Bed Fusion for Aerospace Applications10.1108/RPJ-07-2020-0154 ↗
8. Correlation of Mechanical Properties to Microstructure in Metal Laser Sintering Inconel 71810.1016/j.msea.2017.11.125 ↗
9. Common defects and contributing parameters in powder bed fusion AM process and their classification for online monitoring and control: A review10.1007/s00170-017-1172-6 ↗
10. Metal Additive Manufacturing in Aerospace: A Review10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110008 ↗
11. Diniță, A., Neacșa, A., Portoacă, A.I., Tănase, M., Ilinca, C.N., and Ramadan, I.N. (2023). Additive Manufacturing Post-Processing Treatments, a Review with Emphasis on Mechanical Characteristics. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16134610 ↗
12. A Critical Review on the Effects of Process-Induced Porosity on the Mechanical Properties of Alloys Fabricated by Laser Powder Bed Fusion10.1007/s10853-022-06990-7 ↗
13. Microstructure, Fatigue, and Impact Toughness Properties of Additively Manufactured Nickel Alloy 718
14. Mechanisms Driving High-cycle Fatigue Life of As-built Inconel 718 Processed by Laser Powder Bed Fusion10.1016/j.msea.2019.06.003 ↗
15. The Effect of Specimen Geometry on the Low Cycle Fatigue Life of Metallic Materials10.3184/096034011X12982896521562 ↗
16. Heat Treatment of Inconel 718 Produced by Selective Laser Melting: Microstructure and Mechanical Properties10.1016/j.msea.2019.02.046 ↗
17. Kelkar, R., Andreaco, A., Ott, E., and Groh, J. (2018). Alloy 718: Laser Powder Bed Additive Manufacturing for Turbine Applications. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 & Derivatives: Energy, Aerospace, and Industrial Applications, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-319-89480-5_3 ↗
18. In-situ Neutron Diffraction Measurements of Residual Stress Evolution during Fatigue Crack Growth in Laser Powder Bed Fusion Inconel 718
19. Synergistic Effect of Microstructure and Defects on the Initiation of Fatigue Cracks in Additively Manufactured Inconel 71810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2022.107002 ↗
20. The Impact of Surface Orientation on Surface Roughness and Fatigue Life of Laser-Based Powder Bed Fusion Ti-6Al-4V
21. Numerical Modelling of Surface Roughness Effect on the Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Obtained by Additive Manufacturing10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.014 ↗
22. Fatigue Assessment of As-built and Heat-treated Inconel 718 Specimens Produced by Additive Manufacturing Including Notch Effects10.1111/ffe.13300 ↗
23. Role of Defects and Microstructure on the Fatigue Durability of Inconel 718 Obtained by Additive Layer Manufacturing Route10.1111/ffe.14163 ↗
24. Influence of Surface Conditions and Specimen Orientation on High Cycle Fatigue Properties of Inconel 718 Prepared by Laser Powder Bed Fusion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.105392 ↗
25. Johnson, J., and Kujawski, D. (2023). Impact of Notches on Additively Manufactured Inconel 718 Tensile Performance. Materials, 16.10.3390/ma16206740 ↗
26. (2023). Standard Test Method for Metal Powder Skeletal Density by Helium or Nitrogen Pycnometry (Standard No. ASTM Standard B923).
27. (2024). Standard Test Method for Tap Density of Metal Powders and Compounds (Standard No. ASTM Standard B527).
28. Influence of Post-Processing on Very High Cycle Fatigue Resistance of Inconel 718 Obtained with Laser Powder Bed Fusion10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106510 ↗