journal article·2025-01-20Open access

3D-Printed Customized Cages for Foot Arthrodesis

Iozefina Botezatu, Dan Lăptoiu, Diana Popescu, Rodica Marinescu

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 2

Abstract

In recent years, the application of 3D-printed implant cages or trusses for foot arthrodesis has emerged as a personalized approach to address complex bone defects and deformities. Twenty studies involving different regions of the foot, such as the ankle and subtalar joints, were reviewed to document the 3D-printed custom solutions. The design of these implants is also discussed, including custom titanium trusses and lattice structures, which can promote osseointegration and fit the bone geometries. From a mechanical perspective, these implants proved to be stable and compatible with natural bone, aiming to reduce stress shielding while offering the mechanical strength needed for optimal outcomes. This systematic survey also addresses the additive manufacturing processes involved, namely EBM, SLM, or DMLS. Clinical cases were focused on patients with large bone loss, failed prior fusions, and deformity corrections, with the follow-up results showing high rates of fusion and functional improvement. Of the analyzed studies, three provide level III evidence, while the rest provide level IV or V, consisting of case series or reports. Since 2015, 148 patients have been reported to receive such implants. This review addresses the question, “how effective are 3D-printed titanium cage implants in foot arthrodesis in addressing large bone defects and deformities?” It is the first review to gather data on the use of such customized implants in foot arthrodesis, providing critical insights to enhance their application, including amputation avoidance. This study highlights the advantages of personalized 3D-printed implants in achieving a better anatomical fit, improving clinical outcomes, and ensuring faster recovery times, while also addressing considerations such as the cost and the need for long-term clinical data.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation · Bone fractures and treatments · Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Orthopedics, Colentina Clinical Hospital, 020125 Bucharest, Romania

Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Robotics, National University of Science and Technology Politehnica Bucharest, 060042 Bucharest, Romania

Department of Orthopedics, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania

References (61)

Show source-provided references
1. Ankle arthrodesis: Indications and techniques10.5435/00124635-200005000-00007 ↗
2. Complex ankle arthrodesis: Review of the literature10.5312/wjo.v6.i8.602 ↗
3. Arthrodesis in the Charcot foot: A systematic review
4. Early Efficacy of Combined Total Ankle Total Talus Replacement (TATR) in the Revision Setting10.1177/2473011423S00091 ↗
5. Clinical applications of custom 3D printed implants in complex lower extremity reconstruction10.1186/s41205-020-00083-4 ↗
6. Perceived risk factors for nonunion following foot and ankle arthrodesis10.1177/2309499017692703 ↗
7. Three-dimensional Printing in Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Applications and Future Developments
8. A systematic review of follow-up results of additively manufactured customized implants for the pelvic area10.1080/17434440.2023.2183839 ↗
9. Effect of pore size on bone ingrowth into porous titanium implants fabricated by additive manufacturing: An in vivo experiment10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.069 ↗
10. Frictional and bonei ngrowth properties of engineered surface topographies producedby electron beam technology10.1007/s00402-010-1218-9 ↗
11. New 3-dimensional implant application as an alternative to allograft in limb salvage surgery:a technical note on 10 cases10.1080/17453674.2020.1755543 ↗
12. Comparative analysis of current 3D printed acetabular titanium implants10.1186/s41205-019-0052-0 ↗
13. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement10.1136/bmj.b2535 ↗
14. 3D printed titanium cages combined with the Masquelet technique for the reconstruction of segmental femoral defects: Preliminary clinical results and molecular analysis of the biological activity of human-induced membranes10.1097/OI9.0000000000000016 ↗
15. Comparison of 3D Printed Spherical Implants versus Femoral Head Allografts for Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis10.1053/j.jfas.2019.10.015 ↗
16. Outcomes of surgical reconstruction using custom 3D-Printed porous titanium implants for Critical-Sized bone defects of the foot and ankle10.1177/10711007221077113 ↗
17. Lower limb salvage using Patent-Specific 3D-Printed titanium cage following severe left ankle traumatic partial amputation: A pediatric case report10.1177/1938640020954819 ↗
18. Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional printed titanium truss cage with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis for salvage of persistent distal tibia nonunion10.1177/1938640015593079 ↗
19. (2024, October 03). Available online: https://4webmedical.com/.
20. (2013). Truss Implant. (8430930B2/2013), U.S. Patent, Available online: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8430930B2/en.
21. Three-dimension correction of Charcot ankle deformity with a titanium implant10.1080/24699322.2021.1887356 ↗
22. Custom Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Truss Tibiotalocalcaneal Arthrodesis Implants for failed total ankle replacements: Classification, technical tips, and treatment algorithm10.1177/10711007241255381 ↗
23. (2024, October 10). Available online: https://www.restor3d.com/.
24. (2020). Sheet Based Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Implants for Promoting Osseointegration and Methods for Producing Same. (11026798B1/2020), U.S. Patent.
25. Kelly, C.N., Lin, A.S., Leguineche, K.E., Shekhar, S., Walsh, W.R., Guldberg, R.E., and Gall, K. (2021). Functional repair of critically sized femoral defects treated with bioinspired titanium gyroid-sheet scaffolds. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 116.10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.104380 ↗
26. (2024, October 10). Available online: https://www.lrsimplants.com/.
27. The use of a 3D printed titanium implant for arthrodesis in the management of large osseous defects in the ankle10.1016/j.fas.2023.05.005 ↗
28. (2024, October 03). Available online: https://meshworksimplants.com/.
29. Three-Dimensional printed cage in patients with tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis using a retrograde intramedullary nail: Early outcomes
30. Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed titanium implants for complex foot and ankle limb salvage, deformity correction, and arthrodesis procedures10.1177/1071100718770133 ↗
31. Salvage of severe foot and ankle trauma with a 3D printed scaffold10.1177/1071100715620895 ↗
32. Salvage of Failed Total Ankle Replacement Using a Custom Titanium Truss10.1053/j.jfas.2015.12.011 ↗
33. Five-Year Follow-Up of Distal Tibia Bone and Foot and Ankle Trauma Treated with a 3D-Printed Titanium Cage
34. Use of three-dimensional titanium trusses for arthrodesis procedures in foot and ankle surgery: A retrospective case series10.1053/j.jfas.2020.08.011 ↗
35. Revision of failed total ankle replacement with a custom 3-Dimensional printed talar component with a titanium truss cage: A case presentation10.1053/j.jfas.2018.12.036 ↗
36. Subtalar joint distraction arthrodesis utilizing a titanium truss: A case series10.1053/j.jfas.2018.11.022 ↗
37. Salvage arthrodesis of a failed total ankle replacement using a custom 3D-printed cage implant: A case report and review of the literature10.1177/2010105818760047 ↗
38. Improved pain and function after TTC fusion with a custom cage10.1177/10711007221115182 ↗
39. Treatment of severe avascular necrosis of the talus using a novel Keystone-Shaped 3D-Printed titanium truss implant10.1177/24730114211043516 ↗
40. Large osseous defect reconstruction using a custom Three-Dimensional printed titanium truss implant10.1053/j.jfas.2017.07.019 ↗
41. Highlander, P.D. (2024). 11—Tibiotalocalcaneal fusion with talar cage for hindfoot reconstruction. Clinical Applications of 3D Printing in Foot and Ankle Surgery, Elsevier. [1st ed.].
42. Comparative Studies of Bone Graft and Orthobiologics for Foot Ankle Arthrodesis: A Critical Review
43. Adams, S.B., and Cush, G.J. (2021). Tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis after failed total ankle replacement: Metallic 3D printed custom cages. Primary and Revision Total Ankle Replacement: Evidence-Based Surgical Management, Springer International Publishing.10.1007/978-3-030-69269-8_35 ↗
44. Health-care costs associated with amputation or reconstruction of a limb-threatening injury10.2106/JBJS.F.01350 ↗
45. Regulating 3D-printed medical products10.1126/scitranslmed.aan6521 ↗
46. Kushwaha, A.K., Rahman, M.H., Slater, E., Patel, R., Evangelista, C., Austin, E., Tompkins, E., McCarroll, A., Rajak, D.K., and Menezes, P.L. (2022). Powder bed fusion–based additive manufacturing: SLS, SLM, SHS, and DMLS. Tribology of Additively Manufactured Materials, Elsevier.10.1016/B978-0-12-821328-5.00001-9 ↗
47. Wysocki, B., Maj, P., Sitek, R., Buhagiar, J., Kurzydłowski, K.J., and Święszkowski, W. (2017). Laser and Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing Methods of Fabricating Titanium Bone Implants. Appl. Sci., 7.10.3390/app7070657 ↗
48. Optimization of SLM process parameters for Ti6Al4V medical implants10.1108/RPJ-05-2018-0112 ↗
49. Characterisation of 3D-printed acetabular hip implants10.1530/EOR-23-0182 ↗
50. Characterization of dimensional, morphological and morphometric features of retrieved 3D-printed acetabular cups for hip arthroplasty10.1186/s13018-020-01665-y ↗
51. Surgical tip: Titanium foam blocks can simplify fusion of failed total ankle replacements10.1016/j.foot.2014.06.002 ↗
52. Unsuccessful Use of a Titanium Mesh Cage in Ankle Arthrodesis: A Report on Three Cases Operated on due to a Failed Ankle Replacement10.1053/j.jfas.2008.02.016 ↗
53. Commercially available trabecular metal ankle interpositional spacer for tibiotalocalcaneal arthrodesis secondary to severe bone loss of the ankle10.1053/j.jfas.2013.11.004 ↗
54. Poor outcomes of fusion with Trabecular Metal implants after failed total ankle replacement: Early results in 11 patients10.1016/j.otsr.2017.11.022 ↗
55. Retrograde nailing, trabecular metal implant and use of bone marrow aspirate concentrate after failed ankle joint replacement10.1016/j.fas.2020.03.003 ↗
56. Long, S., Zhu, J., Jing, Y., He, S., Cheng, L., and Shi, Z. (2023). A Comprehensive Review of Surface Modification Techniques for Enhancing the Biocompatibility of 3D-Printed Titanium Implants. Coatings, 13.10.3390/coatings13111917 ↗
57. Bai, L., Gong, C., Chen, X., Sun, Y., Zhang, J., Cai, L., Zhu, S., and Xie, S.Q. (2019). Additive Manufacturing of Customized Metallic Orthopedic Implants: Materials, Structures, and Surface Modifications. Metals, 9.10.3390/met9091004 ↗
58. (2024, November 22). Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2017 on medical devices, amending Directive 2001/83/EC, Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 and Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 and repealing Council Directives 90/385/EEC and 93/42/EEC (Text with EEA relevance. Document 32017R0745, 2017, pp. 1–175. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32017R0745.
59. Balancing the customization and standardization: Exploration and layout surrounding the regulation of the growing field of 3D-printed medical devices in China10.1007/s42242-022-00187-2 ↗
60. (2024, October 29). FDA, Technical Considerations for Additive Manufactured Medical Devices, Available online: https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/products-and-medical-procedures/3d-printing-medical-devices.
61. Azeem, R.U., Moghaddam, S.K., Kaye, R., MacKenzie, M., Di Ilio, V., Umar, Y., and Cheong, Y. (2024). 3D Printing Adoption in NHS Trusts within the United Kingdom. Bioprinting, 41.10.1016/j.bprint.2024.e00346 ↗