journal article·2025-01-03Open access

Federated Learning Lifecycle Management for Distributed Medical Artificial Intelligence Applications: A Case Study on Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Complication Prediction Solution

Min Hyuk Jung, InSeo Song, KangYoon Lee

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 1

Abstract

The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) has unveiled considerable prospects for delivering efficacious solutions in the medical domain. Nevertheless, existing legal frameworks and concerns regarding data privacy associated with medical information impose substantial constraints on implementing AI solutions in this domain. Federated learning is a paradigm that enables the training of machine learning models in a decentralized manner without transferring data to a central repository, allowing model development while preserving data privacy across medical and other industries. This study provided a comprehensive framework for applying federated learning to AI solutions in the medical domain. It advocates a sustainable learning ecosystem by overseeing federated learning servers and clients and evaluating performance by managing the federated learning lifecycle. To enhance its practical relevance, this framework includes a detailed process for continuous lifecycle management, involving model deployment, aggregation, testing, evaluation, versioning, and real-time monitoring through the FedOps platform, supporting a sustainable solution. In this study, the feasibility of the proposed methodology was verified using a post-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) complication–prediction framework. The performance of the solution after transitioning to a federated learning approach was compared with that of an existing centralized solution. The findings indicated no statistically significant difference in performance between the two methodologies. This implies that federated learning can augment data usability and facilitate the integration of AI technologies into the medical domain, where the preservation of data privacy is critically important.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of IT Convergence Engineering, Gachon University, Seoul 13120, Republic of Korea

Funding

Korea Health Technology R&D Project · Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI) · Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. Murdoch, B. (2021). Privacy and artificial intelligence: Challenges for protecting health information in a new era. BMC Med. Ethics, 22.10.1186/s12910-021-00687-3 ↗
2. Park, J.-H., Baek, J.-H., Sym, S.J., Lee, K.Y., and Lee, Y. (2020). A data-driven approach to a chemotherapy recommendation model based on deep learning for patients with colorectal cancer in Korea. BMC Med. Inform. Decis. Mak., 20.10.1186/s12911-020-01265-0 ↗
3. From distributed machine learning to federated learning: A survey10.1007/s10115-022-01664-x ↗
4. Privacy protection and data utilization10.4258/hir.2021.27.1.1 ↗
5. FedCL: Federated contrastive learning for multi-center medical image classification10.1016/j.patcog.2023.109739 ↗
6. Federated learning with knowledge distillation for multi-organ segmentation with partially labeled datasets10.1016/j.media.2024.103156 ↗
7. Federated learning for medical image analysis: A survey10.1016/j.patcog.2024.110424 ↗
8. The future of digital health with federated learning10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 ↗
9. The “Big Five” Complications After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Do We Still Have to Be Afraid of Them?10.1016/j.jcin.2018.12.019 ↗
10. From federated learning to federated neural architecture search: A survey10.1007/s40747-020-00247-z ↗
11. McMahan, B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., and Arcas, B.A. (2017, January 20–22). Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data. Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA. Available online: https://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/mcmahan17a.html.
12. A state-of-the-art survey on solving non-IID data in Federated Learning10.1016/j.future.2022.05.003 ↗
13. Federated learning on non-IID data: A survey10.1016/j.neucom.2021.07.098 ↗
14. Zhao, Y., Li, M., Lai, L., Suda, N., Civin, D., and Chandra, V. (2022). Federated Learning with Non-IID Data. arXiv.
15. Beutel, D.J., Topal, T., Mathur, A., Qiu, X., Fernandez-Marques, J., Gao, Y., Sani, L., Li, K.H., Parcollet, T., and de Gusmão, P.P.B. (2020). Flower: A friendly federated learning research framework. arXiv.
16. Paszke, A., Gross, S., Massa, F., Lerer, A., Bradbury, J., Chanan, G., Killeen, T., Lin, Z., Gimelshein, N., and Antiga, L. (2019). PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library. arXiv.
17. Abadi, M., Barham, P., Chen, J., Chen, Z., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., Ghemawat, S., Irving, G., and Isard, M. (2016, January 2–4). Tensorflow: A system for large-scale machine learning. Proceedings of the 12th USENIX Conference on Operating System Design and Implementation, Savannah, GA, USA. Available online: https://www.usenix.org/conference/osdi16/technical-sessions/presentation/abadi.
18. Bisong, E. (2019). Introduction to Scikit-learn. Building Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models on Google Cloud Platform, Apress.10.1007/978-1-4842-4470-8 ↗
19. FedOps: A Platform of Federated Learning Operations With Heterogeneity Management10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3349691 ↗
20. FLScalize: Federated Learning Lifecycle Management Platform10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3275439 ↗
21. FedOps (2024, October 11). FedOps: Federated Learning Life Cycle Management Platform. Available online: https://ccl.gachon.ac.kr/fedops.
22. He, C., Li, S., So, J., Zeng, X., Zhang, M., Wang, H., Wang, X., Vepakomma, P., Singh, A., and Qiu, H. (2020). FedML: A research library and benchmark for federated machine learning. arXiv.
23. FATE: An industrial grade platform for collaborative learning with data protection
24. Caldas, S., Duddu, S.M.K., Wu, P., Li, T., Konečný, J., McMahan, H.B., Smith, V., and Talwalkar, A. (2018). LEAF: A benchmark for federated settings. arXiv.
25. Li, L., Wang, J., and Xu, C. (2020, January 28–29). FLSim: An extensible and reusable simulation framework for federated learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques, Guiyang, China.10.1007/978-3-030-72792-5_30 ↗
26. Introduction to Aortic Stenosis10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300156 ↗
27. Clinical Outcomes in non-surgically managed patients with very severe versus severe aortic stenosis10.1136/heartjnl-2011-300137 ↗
28. Current Status of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement10.1016/j.jacc.2012.01.071 ↗
29. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): Recent updates10.1016/j.pcad.2021.11.003 ↗
30. Machine learning method for predicting pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement10.1111/pace.14163 ↗
31. Epidemiology, evaluation, and management of conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.004 ↗
32. Abdollahi Vayghan, L., Saied, M.A., Toeroe, M., and Khendek, F. (2018, January 2–7). Deploying Microservice Based Applications with Kubernetes: Experiments and Lessons Learned. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE 11th International Conference on Cloud Computing (CLOUD), San Francisco, CA, USA.10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00148 ↗
33. Kubernetes Authors (2024, October 29). Kubernetes Documentation. Kubernetes.io. Available online: https://kubernetes.io/.
34. Microservices10.1109/MS.2015.11 ↗
35. Research of PPI prediction model based on POST-TAVR ECG