journal article·2024-12-16Open access

App-Based Self-Adjustment—User Behavior and Adjustment Practices of Cochlear Implant Users in Everyday Life

Sven Kliesch, Josef Chalupper, Thomas Lenarz, Andreas Büchner

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 24

Abstract

This study evaluated the effectiveness and usage of a smartphone application for adjusting the hearing impression of cochlear implants or hearing aids in everyday contexts. Building on previous laboratory research that demonstrated subjective auditory perception improvements through personalized settings, this research aimed to confirm these findings in real-life scenarios. Additionally, it analyzes user behavior and adaptation practices. Over a period of six months, 15 participants, including both bimodal and bilateral cochlear implant recipients, employed a self-adjustment app in their everyday lives. This application enabled them to modify the auditory experience through two distinct user interfaces and store their configurations as accessible programs. The collected data indicated that all participants were able to operate the app, and 13 of 15 participants successfully used the app throughout the whole study. In contrast to our previous findings, the acoustic environment did not affect frequency settings but did influence the choice of user interface. Bimodal users more frequently adjusted the settings for each ear independently compared to bilateral users. Most participants stated that they would also use the app outside of this study.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation · Noise Effects and Management · Hearing Impairment and Communication

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Otolaryngology, Medical School of Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany

Cluster of Excellence “Hearing4all”, Medical School of Hannover, 30625 Hannover, Germany

Advanced Bionics, European Research Center, 30625 Hannover, Germany

Funding

Advanced Bionics GmbH

References (18)

Show source-provided references
1. The effects of cochlear implantation on speech perception in older adults10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03310.x ↗
2. Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182741aa7 ↗
3. A predictive modelof cochlear implant performance in postlingually deafened adults10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819d3480 ↗
4. Background sounds and hearing-aid users: A scoping review10.3109/14992027.2015.1072773 ↗
5. Lazard, D.S., Vincent, C., Venail, F., Van de Heyning, P., Truy, E., Sterkers, O., Skarzynski, P.H., Skarzynski, H., Schauwers, K., and O’Leary, S. (2012). Pre-, Per- and Postoperative Factors Affecting Performance of Postlinguistically Deaf Adults Using Cochlear Implants: A New Conceptual Model over Time. PLoS ONE, 7.10.1371/journal.pone.0048739 ↗
6. Self-Adjustment of Upper Electrical Stimulation Levels in CI Programming and the Effect on Auditory Functioning10.1097/AUD.0000000000000404 ↗
7. Gößwein, J.A., Huber, R., Bruns, T., Rennies, J., and Kollmeier, B. (March, January 28). Audiologist-Supervised Self-Fitting Fine Tuning of Hearing Aids. Proceedings of the Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Audiologie, Halle, Germany.
8. Cochlear Implant Programming: A Global Survey on the State of the Art
9. Kliesch, S., Chalupper, J., Lenarz, T., and Büchner, A. (2023). Evaluation of Two Self-Fitting User Interfaces for Bimodal CI-Recipients. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13148411 ↗
10. The next generation of Nucleus fitting: A multiplatform approach towards universal cochlear implant management10.3109/14992027.2013.781277 ↗
11. Phonak (2024, January 17). AutoSense OS™. Available online: https://www.phonak.com/at/de/ueber-uns/autosense-os-technologie.html.
12. Rakita, L. (2024, January 17). AutoSense OS. Phonak Insight. Available online: https://www.phonakpro.com/content/dam/phonakpro/gc_hq/de/resources/evidence/white_paper/documents/insight_btb_autosense-os_belong_s3_028-1585.pdf.
13. Client-based adjustments of hearing aid gain: The effect of different control configurations10.1097/AUD.0b013e31816453a6 ↗
14. Rennies, J., Oetting, D., Baumgartner, H., and Appell, J.E. (2016, January 24–26). User-interface concepts for sound personalization in headphones, Audio Engineering Society. Proceedings of the Conference of Headphone Technology 2016, Aalborg, Denmark.
15. Binaural Benefits for Adults Who Use Hearing Aids and Cochlear Implants in Opposite Ears10.1097/01.AUD.0000111261.84611.C8 ↗
16. Integrated Bimodal Fitting for Unilateral CI Users with Residual Contralateral Hearing10.3390/audiolres11020018 ↗
17. Evaluation of Hearing Aids in Everyday Life Using Ecological Momentary Assessment: What Situations Are We Missing?10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00075 ↗
18. Individual Hearing Aid Benefit in Real Life Evaluated Using Ecological Momentary Assessment10.1177/2331216521990288 ↗