Correlation of the Vickers hardness of RO–Al 2 O 3 –SiO 2 glasses with predicted liquidus temperatures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Vickers hardnesses of RO–Al 2 O 3 –SiO 2 glasses were measured over a broad range of compositions, ranging from ternary endpoints to mixed ratios of RO (CaO with MgO, SrO, or BaO), with the systematic variation of Al 2 O 3 and SiO 2 levels. The hardnesses of CAS and MAS glasses are similar, ranging from 6.7 to 7.2 GPa, with the replacement of CaO with MgO producing a marginal increase in hardness. The substitution of SrO or BaO for CaO generally produced in a decrease in hardness down to 4.5 GPa with BaO. The sensitivity to alumina and silica levels, however, was much greater ranging from a minimum of 4.5 GPa to a maximum of ∼8.2 GPa. The correlation of the Vickers hardness with melting temperature was observed in the CAS system but generally not in the RO‐blended glasses. Overall, a combined cation field strength of modifier cations determined the hardness above the critical RO blending ratio.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Metallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics · Glass properties and applications · Advanced materials and composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Ceramic Engineering Department New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University Alfred New York USA
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1111/ijag.1657310.1111/ijag.16573 ↗
2. 10.1038/3631210.1038/36312 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0016-7037(97)00126-910.1016/S0016-7037(97)00126-9 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.01910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.019 ↗
5. 10.1111/ijag.1656710.1111/ijag.16567 ↗
6. Varshneya AK · 2006
7. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.06.02310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.06.023 ↗
8. LambersonL.Influence of atomic structure on plastic deformation in tectosilicate calcium‐aluminosilicate magnesium‐aluminosilicate and calcium‐galliosilicate glasses. [Ph.D. Thesis].Ithaca NY:Cornell University;2016.
9. 10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00209-X10.1016/S0022-3093(00)00209-X ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.14410.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.144 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.01710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.01.017 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.09.03610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.09.036 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.05.04910.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.05.049 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.11.04110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.11.041 ↗
15. 10.1016/S0022-3093(99)00422-610.1016/S0022-3093(99)00422-6 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.03.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.03.015 ↗
17. 10.1063/1.490609910.1063/1.4906099 ↗
18. Pelton AD · 1988
19. PeltonAD BlanderM editors.Computer‐assisted analysis of the thermodynamic properties and phase diagrams of slags. In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on metallurgical slags and fluxes.Warrendale PA:RMS‐AIME;1984.
20. 10.1007/BF0265714410.1007/BF02657144 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.00210.1016/j.calphad.2016.05.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.08810.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.088 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.08910.1016/j.ceramint.2020.04.089 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.calphad.2018.09.00110.1016/j.calphad.2018.09.001 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2018.05.02210.1016/j.jmrt.2018.05.022 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.15210.1016/j.ceramint.2018.07.152 ↗
27. 10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00775-X10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00775-X ↗