journal article·2024-03-12Open access

A Study on the Surrogate-Based Optimization of Flexible Wings Considering a Flutter Constraint

Alessandra Lunghitano, Frederico Afonso, Afzal Suleman

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 6

Abstract

Accounting for aeroelastic phenomena, such as flutter, in the conceptual design phase is becoming more important as the trend toward increasing the wing aspect ratio forges ahead. However, this task is computationally expensive, especially when utilizing high-fidelity simulations and numerical optimization. Thus, the development of efficient computational strategies is necessary. With this goal in mind, this work proposes a surrogate-based optimization (SBO) methodology for wing design using a predefined machine learning model. For this purpose, a custom-made Python framework was built based on different open-source codes. The test subject was the classical Goland wing, parameterized to allow for SBO. The process consists of employing a Latin Hypercube Sampling plan and subsequently simulating the resulting wing on SHARPy to generate a dataset. A regression-based machine learning model is then used to build surrogate models for lift and drag coefficients, structural mass, and flutter speed. Finally, after validating the surrogate model, a multi-objective optimization problem aiming to maximize the lift-to-drag ratio and minimize the structural mass is solved through NSGA-II, considering a flutter constraint. This SBO methodology was successfully tested, reaching reductions of three orders of magnitude in the optimization computational time.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Aeroelasticity and Vibration Control · Turbomachinery Performance and Optimization · Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

IDMEC, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Av. Rovisco Pais, 1049-001 Lisboa, Portugal

Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy

Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. A review on non-linear aeroelasticity of high aspect-ratio wings10.1016/j.paerosci.2016.12.004 ↗
2. Flutter and post-flutter constraints in aircraft design optimization10.1016/j.paerosci.2019.04.001 ↗
3. Survey of Multifidelity Methods in Uncertainty Propagation, Inference, and Optimization10.1137/16M1082469 ↗
4. Issues in Deciding Whether to Use Multifidelity Surrogates10.2514/1.J057750 ↗
5. A review on design of experiments and surrogate models in aircraft real-time and many-query aerodynamic analyses10.1016/j.paerosci.2017.11.003 ↗
6. Machine learning in aerodynamic shape optimization10.1016/j.paerosci.2022.100849 ↗
7. Model order reduction in aerodynamics: Review and applications10.1177/0954410019853472 ↗
8. Impact of Low-Order Modeling on Aeroelastic Predictions for Very Flexible Wings10.2514/1.C036869 ↗
9. High-Fidelity Aerostructural Optimization with a Geometrically Nonlinear Flutter Constraint10.2514/1.J062127 ↗
10. High-Fidelity Gradient-Based Wing Structural Optimization Including Geometrically Nonlinear Flutter Constraint10.2514/1.J061575 ↗
11. Bryson, D., Rumpfkeil, M., and Durscher, R. (2017, January 5–9). Framework for Multifidelity Aeroelastic Vehicle Design Optimization. Proceedings of the 18th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, Denver, CO, USA.10.2514/6.2017-4322 ↗
12. Thelen, A.S., Bryson, D.E., Stanford, B.K., and Beran, P.S. (2022). Multi-Fidelity Gradient-Based Optimization for High-Dimensional Aeroelastic Configurations. Algorithms, 15.10.3390/a15040131 ↗
13. Reduced-order modeling: New approaches for computational physics10.1016/j.paerosci.2003.12.001 ↗
14. Reliability-Based Design Optimization of Nonlinear Aeroelasticity Problems10.2514/1.46665 ↗
15. Computational strategies for reliability-based structural optimization of aeroelastic limit cycle oscillations10.1007/s00158-011-0663-6 ↗
16. Nonlinear state feedback control design to eliminate subcritical limit cycle oscillations in aeroelastic systems
17. Optimization and comparison of strut-braced and high aspect ratio wing aircraft configurations including flutter analysis with geometric non-linearities10.1016/j.ast.2022.107531 ↗
18. Cea, A., and Palacios, R. (2022, January 3–7). Parametric Reduced Order Models for the Aeroelastic Design of Flexible Vehicles. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2022-0727 ↗
19. Toffol, F., and Ricci, S. (2023). Preliminary Aero-Elastic Optimization of a Twin-Aisle Long-Haul Aircraft with Increased Aspect Ratio. Aerospace, 10.10.3390/aerospace10040374 ↗
20. Fast Predictions of Aircraft Aerodynamics Using Deep-Learning Techniques10.2514/1.J061234 ↗
21. The Flutter of a Uniorm Cantilever Wing10.1115/1.4009489 ↗
22. SHARPy: A dynamic aeroelastic simulation toolbox for very flexible aircraft and wind turbines10.21105/joss.01885 ↗
23. Katz, J., and Plotkin, A. (2001). Low-Speed Aerodynamics, Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511810329 ↗
24. Géradin, M., and Cardona, A. (2001). Flexible Multibody Dynamics: A Finite Element Approach, John Wiley.
25. State-Space Realizations and Internal Balancing in Potential-Flow Aerodynamics with Arbitrary Kinematics10.2514/1.J058153 ↗
26. Corke, T. (2003). Design of Aircraft, Pearson Education, Inc.
27. Düssler, S., Goizueta, N., Muñoz-Simón, A., and Palacios, R. (2022, January 3–7). Modelling and Numerical Enhancements on a UVLM for Nonlinear Aeroelastic Simulation. Proceedings of the AIAA SCITECH 2022 Forum, San Diego, CA, USA.10.2514/6.2022-2455 ↗
28. Enhanced Unsteady Vortex Lattice Aerodynamics for Nonlinear Flexible Aircraft Dynamic Simulation10.2514/1.J063174 ↗
29. Wright, J., and Cooper, J. (2015). Introduction to Aircraft Aeroelasticity and Loads, Wiley.10.1002/9781118700440 ↗
30. Baudin, M., Christopoulou, M., Collette, Y., Martinez, J.M., Lee, A.D., Sjögren, R., and Svensson, D. (2023, October 31). pyDOE2: An Experimental Design Package for Python. Available online: https://pythonhosted.org/pyDOE/#.
31. Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python
32. Bayesian Optimization for Adaptive Experimental Design: A Review10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2966228 ↗
33. Constrained efficient global multidisciplinary design optimization using adaptive disciplinary surrogate enrichment10.1007/s00158-023-03736-0 ↗
34. Extremely randomized trees10.1007/s10994-006-6226-1 ↗
35. Federal Aviation Administration (2011). Office of Primary Responsibility ACE-100, Small Airplane Directorate, System Safety Analysis and Assessment for Part 23 Airplanes, Technical Report 23.1309-1E.
36. A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II10.1109/4235.996017 ↗
37. A parallel global multiobjective framework for optimization: Pagmo10.21105/joss.02338 ↗