Study on the Distribution Law of Crustal Stress in Fault Fracture Area
Source abstract
Abstract
Determining crustal stress is crucial in the design and construction of underground engineering projects, particularly in fault fracture zones. This paper aims to identify the characteristic factors that influence the crustal stress of faults, including the difference in deformation characteristics between faults and ordinary formations (expressed by the elastic modulus ratio Er/Ef), the degree of fault fragmentation P, and the angle α between fault tendency and the principal stress direction. Numerical simulations are conducted to investigate the impact of these three factors on the magnitude and direction of the principal stress. Additionally, measured stress values from a specific tunnel are analyzed to validate the findings. The results demonstrate the crucial role of α in determining the increase or decrease of principal stress and the direction of the offset. When α is less than 45°, σ1 and σ3 within the fault experience an increase, while σ1 and σ3 in the ordinary surrounding rock area near the fault exhibit a slight decrease. Moreover, the σ1 direction inside the fault deviates towards the parallel fault, whereas σ1 near the outside slightly deviates towards the vertical fault. Conversely, when α is greater than 45°, the trend of principal stress is reversed. Er/Ef affects the magnitude of the principal stress change, with larger values resulting in more pronounced changes. P only affects the stress distribution inside the fault.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Rock Mechanics and Modeling · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Landslides and related hazards
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
National Engineering Laboratory for Construction Technology of High-Speed Railway, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China
Funding
National Railway Group Co., Ltd. · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Rock Stress, Rock Stress Measurements, and the Integrated Stress Determination Method (ISDM)10.1007/s00603-009-0058-9 ↗
2. In-situ stresses controlling hydraulic fracture propagation and fracture breakdown pressure10.1016/j.petrol.2018.01.050 ↗
3. ISRM Suggested Methods for rock stress estimation—Part 3: Hydraulic fracturing (HF) and/or hydraulic testing of pre-existing fractures (HTPF)10.1016/j.ijrmms.2003.08.002 ↗
4. Influence of natural fractures on propagation of hydraulic fractures in tight reservoirs during hydraulic fracturing10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2021.105505 ↗
5. In situ stress measurements of two hydropower projects in Iran by hydraulic fracturing method10.1007/s12517-014-1676-4 ↗
6. Damage approach: A new method for topology optimization with local stress constraints10.1007/s00158-015-1318-9 ↗
7. The stress relief correction method considering irregular borehole shapes10.1016/j.compgeo.2023.105417 ↗
8. Bedrock temperature as a potential method for monitoring change in crustal stress: Theory, in situ measurement, and a case history10.1016/j.jseaes.2016.03.018 ↗
9. Numerical Study of the Mechanical Behavior of Nonpersistent Jointed Rock Masses
10. A new method for estimation of the crustal stress from cored rock samples: Laboratory study in the case of uniaxial compression10.1016/0040-1951(81)90196-7 ↗
11. Laboratory measurement and interpretation of the fracture toughness of formation rocks at great depth10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00156-6 ↗
12. A new method of diametrical core deformation analysis for in-situ stress measurements10.1016/j.ijrmms.2016.11.002 ↗
13. A theory of rock core-based methods for in-situ stress measurement10.1186/BF03352966 ↗
14. In-situ stress test and rockburst analysis in Micang Mountain tunnel10.1080/15567036.2019.1649748 ↗
15. Influence of unsteady temperature on the stress field of a deep buried circular lining tunnel10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104010 ↗
16. Wu, Y.-X., Dong, X.-J., Lin, Y.-Q., and Cheng, H.-D. (2021). Field Test for a Base Isolation Structure on Condition of Horizontal and Initial Displacement. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12010232 ↗
17. Experimental simulation study of rockburst characteristics of Sichuan–Tibet granite: A case study of the Zheduoshan tunnel10.1016/j.enggeo.2022.106701 ↗
18. Rockburst prediction and stability analysis of the access tunnel in the main powerhouse of a hydropower station based on microseismic monitoring10.1016/j.ijrmms.2019.104174 ↗
19. Xu, G., Li, K., Li, M., Qin, Q., and Yue, R. (2022). Rockburst Intensity Level Prediction Method Based on FA-SSA-PNN Model. Energies, 15.10.3390/en15145016 ↗
20. Projection support vector regression algorithms for data regression10.1016/j.knosys.2016.08.030 ↗
21. Mechanical Mechanism of Fault Dislocation Based on in situ Stress State10.3389/feart.2020.00052 ↗
22. Topographic effects on crustal stress around the Atera Fault, central Japan10.1186/s40623-018-0961-y ↗
23. Interaction between in situ stress states and tectonic faults: A comment10.1007/s12613-023-2607-8 ↗
24. Influence of complicated faults on the differentiation and accumulation of in-situ stress in deep rock mass10.1007/s12613-022-2528-y ↗
25. Influence of faults on the geo-stress field distribution and damage evolution mechanism of fracture zones10.1007/s10064-023-03194-4 ↗
26. Countermeasures against large deformation of deep-buried soft rock tunnels in areas with high geostress: A case study10.1016/j.tust.2021.104238 ↗
27. Ground loss model for analyzing shield tunneling-induced surface settlement along curve sections10.1016/j.tust.2021.104250 ↗