A crucible salt saturation method for determining sulfur solubility in glass melt
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Experiments were conducted to determine sulfur solubility in Hanford low‐activity waste ( LAW ) glass melts by a sulfur saturation method. Sulfur‐incorporated glass melts were prepared by salt saturation and bubbling methods. The salt saturation method was performed by mixing crushed premelted baseline glasses with an excess amount of Na 2 SO 4 prior to melting the mixture at 1150°C for 1 hour. The bubbling method involved bubbling the glass melt at 1150°C in a Pt crucible with an SO 2 /O 2 /N 2 gas mix to equilibrate the melt at a known pressure of SO 3 . Preliminary results suggested that performing 1 cycle of mixing and melting was not sufficient to saturate the glass. The bubbling method successfully incorporated sulfur into the glass but caused significant losses of sodium from the melt. In order to saturate the glass melt with sulfate without causing noticeable sodium loss, a modified crucible salt saturation method was developed by repeating the mixing and melting of the glass and salt mixture. For all 3 representative LAW glasses tested in this study, it was found that after 3 mixing and melting cycles, the sulfur concentration reaches a plateau, indicating reasonable sulfur saturation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Building materials and conservation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of River Protection Richland Washington
Funding
U.S. Department of Energy
References (59)
Show source-provided references
1. River protection project system plan ORP‐11242 Rev. 8.U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection Richland WA;2017.
2. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00023.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00023.x ↗
3. 10.4191/kcers.2015.52.2.9210.4191/kcers.2015.52.2.92 ↗
4. PeelerDK KimD‐S ViennaJD SchweigerMJ PiepelGF.Office of River Protection advanced low‐activity waste glass research and development plan PNNL‐24883 (EWG‐RPT‐008).Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;2015.
5. PeelerDK ViennaJD SchweigerMJ FoxKM.Advanced high‐level waste glass research and development plan PNNL‐24450.Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;2015.
6. ViennaJD PiepelGF KimD‐S CrumJV LonerganCE StanfillBA et al.2016 update of Hanford glass property models and constraints for use in estimating the glass mass to be produced at Hanford by implementing current enhanced glass formulation efforts PNNL‐25835.Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;2016.10.2172/1772236 ↗
7. 10.1515/9781501508370-00710.1515/9781501508370-007 ↗
8. 10.1515/9781501508370-00610.1515/9781501508370-006 ↗
9. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb11790.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1965.tb11790.x ↗
10. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1966.tb13301.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1966.tb13301.x ↗
11. The solubility of SO3 in soda‐lime‐silica melts
12. GoldmanDS.REDOX and sulfur solubility in glass melts. Proceedings of the International Congress on Glass.Charleroi Belgium;1985.
13. Solubility limits for troublesome components in a simulated low level nuclear waste glass
14. Volatilisation rates of troublesome components from a simulated low level nuclear waste glass
15. LiH LangowskimMH HrmaPR SchweigerMJ ViennaJD SmithDE.Minor component study for simulated high‐level nuclear waste glasses (Draft) PNNL‐10996.Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laborator;1996.10.2172/207560 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00624-X10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00624-X ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.09.03510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2003.09.035 ↗
18. LorierT ReamerI WorkmanR.Initial sulfate solubility study for sludge batch 4 (SB4) WSRC‐TR‐2005‐00213 Rev. 0.Aiken SC:Savannah River National Laboratory;2005.10.2172/890179 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.00410.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.07.004 ↗
20. ManaraD GrandjeanA PinetO DussossoyJ NeuvilleDR.Factors influencing the sulphate incorporation in radioactive waste glasses. In:Van IseghemP ed.Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXIX. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings. 932.Warrendale PA:Materials Research Society 2006: p.377–84.
21. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.09.04110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.09.041 ↗
22. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02044.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2007.02044.x ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02773.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2008.02773.x ↗
24. Incorporation and speciation of sulphur in glasses for waste immobilisation
25. Influence of Na2O activity on the behaviour of sulphur in glass
26. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.05.01510.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2009.05.015 ↗
27. A multi‐spectroscopic investigation of sulphur speciation in silicate glasses and slags
28. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.03.03710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.03.037 ↗
29. MatlackKS MullerIS CallowRA D'AngeloN BardackiT JosephI et al.Improved technetium retention in Hanford LAW glass – Phase 2 VSL‐11R2260‐1 Rev. 0.Washington DC:Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America;2011.
30. GanH FengZ PapathanassiuAE PeggIL.Effect of minor components on salt formation VSL‐15R3550‐1 Rev. 0 ORP‐61958.Washington DC:Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America;2015.
31. 10.1021/ie400822r10.1021/ie400822r ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.1995.213710.1557/JMR.1995.2137 ↗
33. Sulfate retention and segregation in simulated radioactive waste borosilicate glasses
34. DarabJG GrahamDD MacisaacBD RussellRL SmithHD ViennaJD et al.Sulfur partitioning during vitrification of INEEL sodium bearing waste: Status Report PNNL‐13588.Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;2001.10.2172/786800 ↗
35. HrmaP ViennaJD RicklefsJS.Mechanism of sulfate segregation during glass melting. In:FinchRJ BullenDB eds.Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVI. Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings. 757.Warrendale:Materials Research Society 2003: p.147–52.
36. Sulfate retention during waste glass melting10.1002/9781118407004.ch9 ↗
37. ViennaJD HrmaPR BuchmillerWC RicklefsJS.Preliminary investigation of sulfur loading in hanford LAW glass PNNL‐14649.Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;2004.
38. PeggIL GanH MullerIS McKeownDA MatlackKS.Summary of preliminary results on enhanced sulfate incorporation during vitrification of LAW feeds VSL‐00R3630‐1 Rev. 2.Washington DC:Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America;2008.
39. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00035.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2010.00035.x ↗
40. BillingsAL FoxKM.Sulfate solubility limit verification for DWPF sludge batch 7b SRNL‐STI‐2011‐00482 Rev. 0.Aiken SC:Savannah River National Laboratory;2011.10.2172/1014145 ↗
41. KimD‐S SoderquistCZ IcenhowerJP McGrailBP ScheeleRD McNamaraBK et al.Tc reductant chemistry and crucible melting studies with simulated Hanford low‐activity waste PNNL‐15131.Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;2005.
42. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.10.01310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2017.10.013 ↗
43. 10.1111/jace.1312510.1111/jace.13125 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.11010.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.110 ↗
45. BinghamPA VaishnavS AllsopB GigerI.DOE EM international program: “Glass chemistry and processing issues ‐ sulfur solubility” Project Report.Sheffield UK:Sheffield Hallam University;2016.
46. Personal communication between Dongsang Kim Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland Washington USA and Paul A Bingham Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield UK;2016.
47. KimD ViennaJD KrugerAA.Preliminary ILAW formulation algorithm description 24590‐LAW‐RPT‐RT‐04‐0003. Rev. 1 ORP‐56321 Rev. 0.Richland WA:River Protection Project‐Waste Treatment Plant;2012.10.2172/1110191 ↗
48. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03578.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2003.tb03578.x ↗
49. RielleyE MullerIS PeggIL.Preparation and testing of LAW Matrix Glasses to support WTP property‐composition model development VSL‐04R4480‐1 Rev. 0.Washington DC:Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America;2004.
50. MatlackKS ChaudhuriH GanH MullerIS KotWK GongW et al.Glass formulation testing to increase sulfate incorporation VSL‐04R4960‐1 Rev. 0 ORP‐51808 Rev. 0.Washington DC:Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America;2005.
51. MullerIS MatlackKS GanH JosephI PeggIL.Waste loading enhancements for hanford LAW glasses VSL‐10R1790‐1 Rev. 0 ORP‐48578 Rev. 0.Washington DC:Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America;2010.
52. MatlackKS GongW MullerIS JosephI PeggIL.LAW Envelope A and B glass formulations testing to increase waste loading VSL‐06R6900‐1 Rev. 0 ORP‐56322 Rev. 0.Washington DC:Vitreous State Laboratory The Catholic University of America;2006.10.2172/2335914 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.00810.1016/j.jnucmat.2014.03.008 ↗
54. BlissM.Gaseous sulfate solubility in glass: Experimental method PNNL‐23054.Richland WA:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory;2013.
55. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.05.01810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.05.018 ↗
56. The role of frit in nuclear waste vitrification
57. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.05110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.02.051 ↗
58. 10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03581.x10.1111/j.1551-2916.2009.03581.x ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.06310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.12.063 ↗