New Insight into the Residual Rate of Borosilicate Glasses: Effect of S / V and Glass Composition
Source abstract
Abstract
We report and discuss initial and residual rate measurements performed on 6 borosilicate glasses to highlight (i) some glass composition effects (namely Z n and F e), (ii) the role of dissolved silica, and (iii) the importance of the glass‐surface‐area‐to‐solution‐volume ( S / V ) ratio. We show that there is no apparent relation between the initial and the residual rate. As an example, the well‐known positive effect of Z n on short‐term glass dissolution becomes adverse under residual rate conditions. Dissolved silica as well as S / V strongly impact the transient rate drop regime, but have no or minor effects on the magnitude of the residual rate of the SON 68 glass. Increasing S / V is indeed a good mean to explore higher reaction progresses. Additional simulations performed with the GRAAL model show that, in the case of SON 68 glass altered in deionized water, the residual rate continuously diminishes despite the formation of secondary crystalline phases. This result can be used to derive conservative rate values. More generally, it is shown that the residual rate can fluctuate depending on the relative importance of two coupled mechanisms: the formation of a passivating layer and the transformation of this layer into more stable compounds.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Nuclear materials and radiation effects · Radioactive element chemistry and processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
CEA DEN – Marcoule F‐30207 Bagnols‐sur‐Cèze France
Laboratory for Waste Management Paul Scherrer Institut CH‐5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Glamor ‐ Or How We Achieved a Common Understanding on the Decrease of Glass Dissolution Kinetics10.1002/9780470538371.ch12 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.01210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.012 ↗
3. Ojovan M. I. · 2007
4. 10.2113/gselements.2.6.35710.2113/gselements.2.6.357 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.04410.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.044 ↗
6. 10.1557/PROC-932-122.110.1557/PROC-932-122.1 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.12.03210.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.12.032 ↗
8. 10.1557/PROC-1107-28710.1557/PROC-1107-287 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.02310.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.06.023 ↗
10. ANDRA Report 2005
11. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.02410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.05.024 ↗
12. Chemical Durability of High‐level Waste Glass in Repository Environment: Main Conclusions and Remaining Uncertainties from the GLASTAB and GLAMOR Projects
13. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.02310.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.06.023 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.03.01010.1016/j.apgeochem.2006.03.010 ↗
15. 10.1557/PROC-824-CC5.310.1557/PROC-824-CC5.3 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.09510.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.01.095 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00434-210.1016/S0022-3115(01)00434-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.02710.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.05.027 ↗
19. 10.1016/S1631-0748(02)01459-510.1016/S1631-0748(02)01459-5 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.2041-1294.2011.00067.x10.1111/j.2041-1294.2011.00067.x ↗
21. 10.1016/0022-3093(86)90809-410.1016/0022-3093(86)90809-4 ↗
22. 10.1016/0022-3093(86)90808-210.1016/0022-3093(86)90808-2 ↗
23. Property Modification of a High Level Nuclear Waste Borosilicate Glass Through the Addition of Fe2O3
24. 10.1016/j.gca.2011.05.00510.1016/j.gca.2011.05.005 ↗
25. 10.1016/S0098-3004(03)00004-910.1016/S0098-3004(03)00004-9 ↗
26. CTDP. Available at:http://chess.geosciences.ensmp.fr/home/view?set_language=en(accessed October 9 2013).
27. 10.1021/jp205477q10.1021/jp205477q ↗
28. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.06.01610.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.06.016 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.03210.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.09.032 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.02.01910.1016/j.apgeochem.2013.02.019 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.02610.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.10.026 ↗
32. 10.1557/JMR.2000.028910.1557/JMR.2000.0289 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.02.02210.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.02.022 ↗
34. Predicting the Preference for Charge Compensation in Silicate Glasses
35. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.00410.1016/j.chemgeo.2008.05.004 ↗
36. 10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00573-610.1016/S0022-3115(01)00573-6 ↗
37. 10.1016/S0022-3115(00)00039-810.1016/S0022-3115(00)00039-8 ↗
38. 10.1007/BF0058764810.1007/BF00587648 ↗
39. 10.1038/nmat230110.1038/nmat2301 ↗
40. 10.1021/jp111458f10.1021/jp111458f ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.00610.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2004.06.006 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.12.01610.1016/j.apgeochem.2012.12.016 ↗
43. 10.1021/es304057y10.1021/es304057y ↗
44. C.Jégou “Mise en évidence des mécanismes limitant la cinétique d'altération du verre R7T7 en milieu aqueux” PhD Thesis Université de Montpellier The University of Montpellier France 1998.
45. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.04.00110.1016/j.chemgeo.2013.04.001 ↗
46. Kinetics of Reaction of Water with Glass
47. 10.1016/0022-3093(94)90022-110.1016/0022-3093(94)90022-1 ↗
48. 10.13182/NT83-A3321410.13182/NT83-A33214 ↗
49. 10.1557/PROC-932-94.110.1557/PROC-932-94.1 ↗