Synergistic Evolution and Spatial-Temporal Differences in Green Technological Innovation and Carbon Emission Reduction in the Construction Industry from the Perspective of New Productive Forces
Source abstract
Abstract
Green technological innovation, as a critical emerging resource element, is instrumental in advancing sustainable and high-quality development of the construction sector. However, despite extensive research, the synergistic mechanism linking regional green technology innovation (RGTI) and carbon reduction in the construction industry (CRCI) remains theoretically underexplored, especially through the lens of new quality productivity (NQP). Based on dynamic panel data from 30 Chinese provinces spanning 2013–2021, this study employed multiple analytical approaches, including econometric models, coupling coordination models, kernel density estimation, and Dagum Gini coefficient decomposition, to systematically examine their interactive relationships and spatiotemporal evolution characteristics. The findings reveal that RGTI directly reduces the carbon emissions intensity of the construction industry and yields a “dual-driving effect” through the mediating role of NQP. Significant coupling coordination effects were identified among RGTI, NQP, and CRCI. Further investigation showed that their synergistic evolution manifests distinct “regional lock-in effects” and “polarization effects”, with eastern regions achieving positive interactions, while central and western regions remain constrained by developmental limitations. Although overall disparities narrowed during the study period, inter-regional differences persisted as the dominant factor. This study extends the research perspective on construction industry carbon reduction, contributing to new quality productivity formation and inter-regional emission reduction coordination.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Environmental Impact and Sustainability · Underground infrastructure and sustainability · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Environment and Safety Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212013, China
Funding
Tibet Autonomous Region Key R&D Project
References (57)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed Ali, K., Ahmad, M.I., and Yusup, Y. (2020). Issues, impacts, and mitigations of carbon dioxide emissions in the building sector. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12187427 ↗
2. Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis10.1016/j.rser.2020.109783 ↗
3. Dynamic nexus between technological innovation and building sector carbon emissions in the BRICS countries10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112780 ↗
4. Quantification process of carbon emissions in the construction industry10.1016/j.enbuild.2023.113025 ↗
5. Driving factors of total carbon emissions from the construction industry in Jiangsu Province, China10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123179 ↗
6. Study on spatio-temporal changes and driving factors of carbon emissions at the building operation stage—A case study of China10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109147 ↗
7. Research on regional differences and influencing factors of green technology innovation efficiency of China’s high-tech industry10.1016/j.cam.2019.112597 ↗
8. The cultivation mechanism of green technology innovation in manufacturing industry: From the perspective of ecological niche10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119711 ↗
9. Lin, S., Chen, Z., and He, Z. (2021). Rapid transportation and green technology innovation in cities—From the view of the industrial collaborative agglomeration. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app11178110 ↗
10. Collaborative relationship discovery in green building technology innovation: Evidence from patents in China’s construction industry10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136041 ↗
11. Sizirici, B., Fseha, Y., Cho, C.-S., Yildiz, I., and Byon, Y.-J. (2021). A review of carbon footprint reduction in construction industry, from design to operation. Materials, 14.10.3390/ma14206094 ↗
12. The carbon footprint of buildings: A review of methodologies and applications10.1016/j.rser.2018.07.012 ↗
13. Understanding the impact of environmental regulations on green technology innovation efficiency in the construction industry10.1016/j.scs.2020.102647 ↗
14. Li, C., and Qi, L. (2024). Can Government Environmental Attention Improve Corporate Carbon Emission Reduction Performance?—Evidence from China A-Share Listed Companies with High-Energy-Consumption. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16114660 ↗
15. The role of green finance and digital inclusive finance in promoting economic sustainable development: A perspective from new quality productivity10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122892 ↗
16. Synergistic Industrial Agglomeration, New Quality Productive Forces and High-quality Development of the Manufacturing Industry10.1016/j.iref.2024.103373 ↗
17. Natural resources utilization efficiency under the influence of green technological innovation10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.019 ↗
18. Inherent mechanism of digital technology application empowered corporate green innovation: Based on resource allocation perspective10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118841 ↗
19. Xue, L., Zhang, Q., Zhang, X., and Li, C. (2022). Can digital transformation promote green technology innovation?. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14127497 ↗
20. How does the digital transformation of corporates affect green technology innovation? An empirical study from the perspective of asymmetric effects and structural breakpoints10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139245 ↗
21. The race to net-zero emissions: Can green technological innovation and environmental regulation be the potential pathway to net-zero emissions?10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102364 ↗
22. Green baton: How government interventions advance green technological innovation10.1007/s10668-022-02520-2 ↗
23. Wang, B., Chen, H., Ao, Y., and Liao, F. (2023). Spatiotemporal differentiation and influencing factors of green technology innovation efficiency in the construction industry: A case study of chengdu–chongqing urban agglomeration. Buildings, 13.10.3390/buildings13010073 ↗
24. Li, X., Qin, Q., and Yang, Y. (2023). The impact of green innovation on carbon emissions: Evidence from the construction sector in China. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16114529 ↗
25. Green process innovation, green product innovation and its economic performance improvement paths: A survey and structural model10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113282 ↗
26. Is green technology vertical spillovers more significant in mitigating carbon intensity? Evidence from Chinese industries10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120354 ↗
27. The Impact of Carbon Emission Quota Allocation Regulations on the Investment of Low-Carbon Technology in Electric Power Industry Under Peak-Valley Price Policy10.1109/TEM.2021.3121002 ↗
28. A review of low-carbon technologies and projects for the global cement industry10.1016/j.jes.2023.01.021 ↗
29. Exploring the low-carbon transition pathway of China’s construction industry under carbon-neutral target: A socio-technical system transition theory perspective10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116879 ↗
30. Driving forces for green building technologies adoption in the construction industry: Ghanaian perspective10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.08.053 ↗
31. Agan, B., and Balcilar, M. (2022). On the determinants of green technology diffusion: An empirical analysis of economic, social, political, and environmental factors. Sustainability, 14.10.3390/su14042008 ↗
32. Hu, S., Li, S., Meng, X., Peng, Y., and Tang, W. (2023). Study on regional differences of carbon emission efficiency: Evidence from Chinese construction industry. Energies, 16.10.3390/en16196882 ↗
33. Zhang, J., Shan, Y., Jiang, S., Xin, B., Miao, Y., and Zhang, Y. (2024). Study on the coordinated development degree of new quality productivity and manufacturing carbon emission efficiency in provincial regions of China. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 1–35.10.1007/s10668-024-05321-x ↗
34. On new quality productivity: Connotative characteristics and important focus
35. Can Industrial Digitalization Promote Regional Green Technology Innovation?10.1016/j.jik.2024.100463 ↗
36. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity of carbon intensity in China’s construction industry10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.07.043 ↗
37. Allocation of carbon emission quotas in China’s provincial power sector based on entropy method and ZSG-DEA10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124683 ↗
38. Investigation of a “coupling model” of coordination between low-carbon development and urbanization in China10.1016/j.enpol.2018.05.037 ↗
39. Evaluating the coordinated development of economic, social and environmental benefits of urban public transportation infrastructure: Case study of four Chinese autonomous municipalities10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.02.006 ↗
40. Study on the coupling coordination mechanism of green technology innovation, environmental regulation, and green finance10.1007/s11356-022-20905-8 ↗
41. Coupling coordination analysis and Spatiotemporal heterogeneity between data elements and green development in China10.1016/j.eap.2022.10.014 ↗
42. Spatiotemporal variation and convergence analysis of China’s regional energy security10.1016/j.rser.2023.113923 ↗
43. A study on the measurement and influencing factors of carbon emissions in China’s construction sector10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109912 ↗
44. Wang, S., and Chen, F. (2025). Can New Quality Productivity Promote the Carbon Emission Performance—Empirical Evidence from China. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17020567 ↗
45. How does green technology innovation affect urban carbon emissions? Evidence from Chinese cities10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.115025 ↗
46. Can government subsidies promote the green technology innovation transformation? Evidence from Chinese listed companies10.1016/j.eap.2022.03.020 ↗
47. Evaluation of green technology innovation efficiency in a regional context: A dynamic network slacks-based measuring approach10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121836 ↗
48. Green technology innovation and CO2 emission in China: Evidence from a spatial-temporal analysis and a nonlinear spatial durbin model10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113338 ↗
49. Does green technology innovation promote green economic growth?–Examining regional heterogeneity between resource-based and non-resource-based cities10.1016/j.iref.2024.103406 ↗
50. Divergent paths for green transition: Regional disparities in technology diversification10.1080/00343404.2024.2363327 ↗
51. Cai, A., Zheng, S., Cai, L., Yang, H., and Comite, U. (2021). How does green technology innovation affect carbon emissions? A spatial econometric analysis of China’s provincial panel data. Front. Environ. Sci., 9.10.3389/fenvs.2021.813811 ↗
52. Guo, L., Tan, W., Xu, Y., and Tang, Q. (2024). Curbing regional carbon emissions through green technology innovation: An empirical analysis in China. Environ. Dev. Sustain., 1–24.10.1007/s10668-024-05243-8 ↗
53. Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data10.1016/j.techfore.2019.06.010 ↗
54. Feng, N., Yan, M., and Yan, M. (2024). Spatiotemporal Evolution and Influencing Factors of New-Quality Productivity. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su162410852 ↗
55. Gao, X., and Li, S. (2025). A Dynamic Evolution and Spatiotemporal Convergence Analysis of the Coordinated Development Between New Quality Productive Forces and China’s Carbon Total Factor Productivity. Sustainability, 17.10.3390/su17073137 ↗
56. Zhang, X., He, S., and Shen, J. (2025). The Impact of New Quality Productivity on Carbon Emission Intensity: Evidence from China. Front. Earth Sci., 13.
57. Li, J., Noorliza, K., and Zhang, X. (2024). Enhancing environmental, social, and governance performance through new quality productivity and green innovation. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16114843 ↗