journal article·2025-04-03Open access

Urban Green Space Inequity, Socioeconomic Disparities, and Potential Health Implications in Metropolitan Melbourne

Parian Hoseini, Pooriya Mohseni, Piret Veeroja, Greg Foliente

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGSs) provide city residents contact with nature, offering mental and physical health benefits. However, residents’ access to green spaces in cities can be associated with their socioeconomic status (SESs). This study utilizes the Kernel Density tool as an innovative method to measure UGS inequities and their relationship with cardiovascular disease (CVD) rates. Next, the UGS patterns and their potential implications for CVD are examined across suburbs with a range of SES levels in Melbourne, Australia. The proposed method is tested in conjunction with two commonly used measures of accessibility (Network Analysis) and provision (UGS per capita). The results show that more advantaged suburbs have better access to UGS and lower CVD rates. Moreover, the analysis reveals that a more geographically dispersed UGS pattern, predominantly observed in higher SES suburbs, can be associated with lower CVD than a concentrated pattern, and the integration of the SES and UGS indicators through Kernel Density analysis reveals that inequitable access to green spaces disproportionately impacts the health incomes of socioeconomically disadvantaged communities. Finally, the Kernel Density and Network Analysis tools in ArcGIS can serve as effective supplementary methods for addressing similar considerations in UGS planning and policy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Urban Green Space and Health · Noise Effects and Management · Climate Change and Health Impacts

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Built Environment, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2033, Australia

School of Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2033, Australia

Centre for Urban Transition, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Australia

Department of Infrastructure Engineering, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia

Advanced Research Institute for Informatics, Computing and Networking (AdRIC), College of Computer Studies, De La Salle University, Manila 1004, Philippines

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. Spatial and socioeconomic inequities in liveability in Australia’s 21 largest cities: Does city size matter?10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102899 ↗
2. Leng, H., Li, S., Yan, S., and An, X. (2020). Exploring the relationship between green space in a neighbourhood and cardiovascular health in the winter city of China: A study using a health survey for harbin. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17.10.3390/ijerph17020513 ↗
3. Browning, M., and Lee, K. (2017). Within what distance does “greenness” best predict physical health? A systematic review of articles with gis buffer analyses across the lifespan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.20944/preprints201706.0005.v1 ↗
4. How far do people travel to use urban green space? A comparison of three European cities10.1016/j.apgeog.2022.102673 ↗
5. The fruit of urban nature: Vital neighborhood spaces10.1177/0193841X04264945 ↗
6. The neighborhood socioeconomic inequalities in urban parks in a High-density City: An environmental justice perspective10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104099 ↗
7. Role of physical activity in the relationship between urban green space and health10.1016/j.puhe.2013.01.004 ↗
8. Public green spaces and positive mental health—Investigating the relationship between access, quantity and types of parks and mental wellbeing10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.09.002 ↗
9. Hoffimann, E., Barros, H., and Ribeiro, A.I. (2017). Socioeconomic inequalities in green space quality and Accessibility—Evidence from a Southern European city. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.3390/ijerph14080916 ↗
10. Green space quality and adolescent mental health: Do personality traits matter?10.1016/j.envres.2021.112591 ↗
11. Socio-economic disparities in greenspace quality: Insights from the city of Melbourne10.1108/SASBE-11-2022-0247 ↗
12. Air pollution removal by trees in public green spaces in Strasbourg city, France10.1016/j.ufug.2016.04.010 ↗
13. Defining greenspace: Multiple uses across multiple disciplines10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.024 ↗
14. The analysis and delimitation of Central Business District using network kernel density estimation10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.04.008 ↗
15. Urban green space, tree canopy and prevention of cardiometabolic diseases: A multilevel longitudinal study of 46 786 Australians10.1093/ije/dyz239 ↗
16. Park, Y.M., and Kwan, M.-P. (2017). Multi-contextual segregation and environmental justice research: Toward fine-scale spatiotemporal approaches. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 14.10.3390/ijerph14101205 ↗
17. Heterogeneity in the Subjective Well-being Impact of Access to Urban Green Space10.1016/j.scs.2021.103244 ↗
18. Relative importance of quantitative and qualitative aspects of urban green spaces in promoting health10.1016/j.landurbplan.2021.104131 ↗
19. Raza, W., Bojke, L., Coventry, P.A., Murphy, P.J., Fulbright, H., and White, P.C. (2024). A Systematic Review of the Impact of Changes to Urban Green Spaces on Health and Education Outcomes, and a Critique of Their Applicability to Inform Economic Evaluation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 21.10.3390/ijerph21111452 ↗
20. Urban green space, tree canopy and 11 year risk of dementia in a cohort of 109,688 Australians10.1016/j.envint.2020.106102 ↗
21. The complexities of measuring access to parks and physical activity sites in New York City: A quantitative and qualitative approach10.1186/1476-072X-8-34 ↗
22. Astell-Burt, T., Feng, X., Mavoa, S., Badland, H.M., and Giles-Corti, B. (2014). Do low-income neighbourhoods have the least green space? A cross-sectional study of Australia’s most populous cities. BMC Public Health, 14.10.1186/1471-2458-14-292 ↗
23. Urban green space and health in low and middle-income countries: A critical review10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126662 ↗
24. The health benefits of nature-based solutions to urbanization challenges for children and the elderly—A systematic review10.1016/j.envres.2017.08.004 ↗
25. Green justice or just green? Provision of urban green spaces in Berlin, Germany10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.016 ↗
26. Pereira, G., Foster, S., Martin, K., Christian, H., Boruff, B.J., Knuiman, M., and Giles-Corti, B. (2012). The association between neighborhood greenness and cardiovascular disease: An observational study. BMC Public Health, 12.10.1186/1471-2458-12-466 ↗
27. (2021, July 20). National Health Survey, Available online: https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/health/health-conditions-and-risks/national-health-survey-first-results/2017-18.
28. (2025, March 18). Australian Health Expenditure—Demographics and Diseases: Hospital Admitted Patient Expenditure 2004-05 to 2012-13, Available online: https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/health-welfare-expenditure/health-expenditure-australia-2017-18/contents/summary.
29. Green space and cardiovascular disease: A systematic review with meta-analysis10.1016/j.envpol.2022.118990 ↗
30. Exploring connections among nature, biodiversity, ecosystem services, and human health and well-being: Opportunities to enhance health and biodiversity conservation10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.12.007 ↗
31. Green gentrification or gentrified greening: Metropolitan Melbourne10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105577 ↗
32. Urban green space, public health, and environmental justice: The challenge of making cities “just green enough”10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.017 ↗
33. (2021, July 20). Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS), Available online: https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/lookup/by subject/1270.0.55.001~july 2016~main features~statistical area level 2 (sa2)~10014.
34. (2021, July 15). The 2016 Census of Population and Housing, Available online: https://www.abs.gov.au/%0Aausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by.
35. (2025, March 18). 68% of the World Population Projected to Live in Urban Areas by 2050. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/en/news/population/2018-revision-of-world-urbanization-prospects.html.
36. The physical and non-physical factors that influence perceived access to urban parks10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.09.007 ↗
37. (2025, March 18). VPA Open Data. Available online: https://data-planvic.opendata.arcgis.com/.
38. Factors shaping urban greenspace provision: A systematic review of the literature10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.05.029 ↗
39. Exploring the drivers of green agricultural development (GAD) in China: A spatial association network structure approaches10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105827 ↗
40. The nature of the view from home: Psychological benefits10.1177/00139160121973115 ↗
41. (2021, November 10). Point Density (Spatial Analysis). Available online: https://www.esri.com/en-us/arcgis/products/arcgis-pro/resources.
42. Area-Level Disparities of Public Open Space: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis in Metropolitan Melbourne10.1080/08111146.2014.974747 ↗
43. de Sousa Silva, C., Viegas, I., Panagopoulos, T., and Bell, S. (2018). Environmental justice in accessibility to green infrastructure in two European Cities. Land, 7.10.3390/land7040134 ↗
44. Natural environments—Healthy environments? An exploratory analysis of the relationship between greenspace and health10.1068/a35111 ↗
45. (2022, August 21). Victoria Planning Authority, Metropolitan Open Space Network, Map Journal. Available online: https://planvic.maps.arcgis.com/apps/MapJournal/index.html?appid=8965d9701575408e8ea7f59772e82e10.
46. Green space and physical activity: An observational study using Health Survey for England data10.1016/j.healthplace.2012.06.003 ↗
47. (2021, July 20). Australian Bureau of Statistics, Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas. Census of Population and Housing 2016, Available online: https://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/2033.0.55.0012016?OpenDocument.
48. Understanding the potential loss and inequities of green space distribution with urban densification10.1016/j.ufug.2015.09.003 ↗
49. Neighborhood Environments and Diabetes Risk and Control10.1007/s11892-018-1032-2 ↗
50. What next? Expanding our view of city planning and global health, and implementing and monitoring evidence-informed policy10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00066-3 ↗