journal article·2025-04-01Open access

Hybrid Organisation Structure: A Holistic and Adaptable Approach for Hybrid, Flow-Oriented Assembly Organisation

Marco Bleckmann, Dorit Schumann, Luca Mastroianni, Matthias Schmidt, Peter Nyhuis

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 7

Abstract

This paper summarises the research findings of the HyFlowJobShop research project. The aim of the research project is to combine the organisation structure of the flow principle with the principle of job shop production since traditional organisation structures alone can no longer meet the increased demands for a growing number of variants and shorter amortisation periods for production systems due to shorter product life cycles. The combination of the job shop and flow principle to form hybrid organisation structures is intended to offer producing companies an opportunity to position themselves in the conflict between the required flexibility and the achievement of production logistics targets as well as the resulting costs. To quantify the advantages of hybrid organisation structures, various system configurations are examined as part of a simulation study to identify interdependencies and influencing factors.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Product Development and Customization · Assembly Line Balancing Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Production Systems and Logistics, Leibniz University Hannover, 30823 Garbsen, Germany

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation)

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. Koren, Y. (2010). The Global Manufacturing Revolution: Product-Process-Business Integration and Reconfigurable Systems, Wiley.10.1002/9780470618813 ↗
2. Assembly system design and operations for product variety10.1016/j.cirp.2011.05.004 ↗
3. Research on balancing and sequencing problems of flexible mixed model assembly lines with alternative precedence relations10.1080/00207543.2022.2152890 ↗
4. Lee, S. (1997). Constraint evaluation for assembly sequence planning. Towards Flexible and Agile Assembly and Manufacturing, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.
5. A flexible planning methodology for product family assembly line based on improved NSGA_II10.1108/AA-05-2019-0098 ↗
6. Modelling and Assessing Line-less Mobile Assembly Systems10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.184 ↗
7. Begue, C. (1995). The Performance and Flexibility of Mixed-Model Assembly Lines. [Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin].
8. Danjou, C., Harik, R., Nyffenegger, F., Rivest, L., and Bouras, A. (2023). Hybrid Production Structures as a Solution for Flexibility and Transformability for Longer Life Cycles of Production Systems. Product Lifecycle Management. Leveraging Digital Twins, Circular Economy, and Knowledge Management for Sustainable Innovation, Springer Nature.10.1007/978-3-031-62582-4 ↗
9. Wiendahl, H.-P., Reichardt, J., and Nyhuis, P. (2015). Handbook Factory Planning and Design, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-46391-8 ↗
10. Risikoabhängige Auswahl der Veränderungsfähigkeitsarten10.37544/1436-4980-2025-01-02-6 ↗
11. Design for Mass Customization10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63036-4 ↗
12. ElMaraghy, H.A. (2009). Changeable and Reconfigurable Assembly Systems. Changeable and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, Springer.10.1007/978-1-84882-067-8 ↗
13. Highly Flexible Final Production Stages—Taking Advantages of Scale Effects by Reducing Internal Component Variants10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.907.127 ↗
14. Variant-oriented Assembly Planning10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60358-8 ↗
15. Simulation-based evaluation of performance benefits from flexibility in assembly systems and matrix production10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.047 ↗
16. Matrix Structures for High Volumes and Flexibility in Production Systems10.1016/j.procir.2014.02.040 ↗
17. Schmitt, R., and Schuh, G. (2019). The Impact of Routing and Operation Flexibility on the Performance of Matrix Production Compared to a Production Line. Advances in Production Research, Proceedings of the 8th Congress of the German Academic Association for Production Technology (WGP), Aachen, Germany, 19–20 November 2018, Springer International Publishing.
18. Kern, W., Rusitschka, F., Kopytynski, W., Keckl, S., and Bauernhansl, T. (2015, January 1–4). Alternatives to assembly line production in the automotive industry. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Production Research, Manila, Philippines.
19. Method for a Cross-architecture Assembly Line Planning in the Automotive Industry with Focus on Modularized, Order Flexible, Economical and Adaptable Assembly Processes10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.059 ↗
20. Kampker, A., Kawollek, S., Marquardt, F., and Krummhaar, M. (2020). Potential of Hybrid Assembly Structures in Automotive Industry. SSRN Electron. J.10.2139/ssrn.3848756 ↗
21. Weißgraeber, P. (2021). Agile Hybrid Assembly Systems: Bridging the Gap Between Line and Matrix Configurations. Advances in Automotive Production Technology—Theory and Application, Proceedings of the Stuttgart Conference on Automotive Production (SCAP2020), Stuttgart, Germany, 2–10 November 2020, Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-62962-8 ↗
22. Hybrid Production: Enabled By Controlling the Output Sequence of AMatrix Production Using Answer Set Programming10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.149 ↗
23. Converting assembly lines to assembly cells at Sheet Metal Products: Insights on performance improvements10.1080/00207540412331299594 ↗
24. Semanco, P., and Modrak, V. (2014). Cell Design for Transforming the Job Shop Production Process to Lean. Handbook of Research on Design and Management of Lean Production Systems, IGI Global.
25. Complexity-focused Planning and Operating of Mixed-model Assembly Lines in Automotive Manufacturing10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.058 ↗
26. Florescu, A., and Barabas, S.A. (2020). Modeling and Simulation of a Flexible Manufacturing System—A Basic Component of Industry 4.0. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10228300 ↗
27. Eignungsanalyse zur Einführung hybrider Organisationsformen in der Montage10.1515/zwf-2024-1025 ↗
28. Stickland, F. (1998). The Dynamics of Change: Insights into Organisational Transition from the Natural World, Routledge.
29. Influence of Shifts in Production Programs on the Resilience of Production Systems10.1016/j.procir.2015.12.067 ↗
30. Schumann, D., Stöver, J., and Nyhuis, P. (2024, January 9–12). Effects of the Production Program’s Complexity on the Production Structure. Proceedings of the CPSL 2024, Honolulu, HI, USA.
31. Lotter, B. (2012). Montage in der Industriellen Produktion: Ein Handbuch für Die Praxis, Springer.10.1007/978-3-642-29061-9 ↗
32. Automated sequencing and sub-assembly detection in automobile body assembly planning10.1016/S0924-0136(02)00621-0 ↗
33. A Review of Analytical Systems of Line Balancing10.1287/opre.10.5.626 ↗
34. Bebersdorf, P., and Huchzermeier, A. (2021). Variabler Takt: Mit dem VarioTakt Varianz Beherrschen bei Grenzenloser Produktindividualisierung, Springer Gabler.10.1007/978-3-662-63931-3 ↗
35. Grouping part/product variants based on networked operations sequence10.1016/j.jmsy.2015.10.005 ↗
36. Takeda, H. (2006). The Synchronized Production System: Going Beyond Just-in-Time Through Kaizen, Kogan Page. [1st ed.].
37. Pass, C.L., Lowes, B., and Davies, L. (1993). Collins Dictionary of Economics, HarperCollins. [2nd ed.].