journal article·2025-01-22Open access

Fate of the Mandible in Class III Patients Subjected to Bimaxillary Surgery with a New 3D Planning Reference

Federico Hernández-Alfaro, Carlos de la Fuente-Vázquez, Adaia Valls-Ontañón, Orion-Luiz Haas-Junior, Maria Giralt-Hernando, Jorge Masià-Gridilla

Applied Sciences· Volume 15· Issue 3

Abstract

Class III patients have classically been managed through monomaxillary techniques, mainly involving mandibular setback movements. More recently, according to the upper incisor to soft tissue plane (UI-STP) or Barcelona Line (BL) planning protocol, bimaxillary procedures for upper maxilla advancement and reduced mandibular setback have been recommended in order to secure better aesthetic outcomes and avoid upper airway constriction. The present study describes the jaw movements in the sagittal plane performed in class III patients subjected to bimaxillary surgery following the BL protocol. A retrospective evaluation was performed on 124 class III patients subjected to bimaxillary surgery. All subjects underwent upper maxilla advancement. A total of 112 patients received mandible advancement movement (90.3%), nine received mandibular setback (7.25%), and the mandible underwent no movement along the sagittal dimension in the three remaining patients (2.4%). Mandibular advancement was significantly the most frequent treatment option. The presented results suggest that when the BL planning protocol is used as an aesthetic and functional reference, class III occlusion appears mostly related to maxillary sagittal hypoplasia instead of mandible hyperplasia, so bimaxillary advancement surgery should be considered as one of the first-choice procedures for the treatment of these patients.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics · Temporomandibular Joint Disorders · dental development and anomalies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Institute of Maxillofacial Surgery, Teknon Medical Center, 08022 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Sant Cugat del Vallès, 08194 Barcelona, Spain

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 6681, Brazil

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. Developing Class III malocclusions: Challenges and solutions10.2147/CCIDE.S134303 ↗
2. The effect of chin-cup therapy in Class III malocclusion: A systematic review10.2174/1874210601610010664 ↗
3. Evolution of Class III treatment in orthodontics10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.012 ↗
4. Profit, W., and Fields, H. (2007). Contemporary Orthodontics, Mosby. [3rd ed.].
5. Orthodontic camouflage versus orthodontic-orthognathic surgical treatment in borderline class III malocclusion: A systematic review10.1007/s00784-022-04685-6 ↗
6. Upper incisor to Soft Tissue Plane (UI-STP): A new reference for diagnosis and planning in dentofacial deformities
7. Barcelona line. A multicentre validation study of a facial projection reference in orthognathic surgery10.1016/j.bjoms.2022.10.002 ↗
8. Influence of different surgical concepts for moderate skeletal class II and III treatment on the nasopharyngeal airway space10.1016/j.jcms.2019.07.006 ↗
9. Placing the maxilla in the most aesthetic sagittal position: Validation of several reference lines in relation to the forehead shape10.1016/j.ijom.2023.11.003 ↗
10. A modified intraoral sagittal splitting technique for correction of mandibular prognathism
11. “Twist Technique” for pterygomaxillary dysjunction in minimally invasive Le Fort I Osteotomy10.1016/j.joms.2012.04.032 ↗
12. Cephalometrics: A comparison of five analyses currently used in the diagnosis of dentofacial deformities
13. Cephalometrics for you and me10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7 ↗
14. Cephalometric analysis and synthesis
15. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning-Part II10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81791-3 ↗
16. Maspero, C., Cenzato, N., Inchingolo, F., Cagetti, M.G., Isola, G., Sozzi, D., Del Fabbro, M., and Tartaglia, G.M. (2023). The Maxilla-Mandibular Discrepancies through Soft-Tissue References: Reliability and Validation of the Anteroposterior Measurement. Children, 10.10.3390/children10030459 ↗
17. Segmental Le Fort I osteotomy for management of transverse maxillary de deficiency10.1016/S0278-2391(97)90588-7 ↗
18. Definition of New Three-Dimensional Cephalometric Analysis of Maxillomandibular Sagittal Relationship for Orthodontics and Orthognathic Surgery: Normative Data Based on 700 CBCT Scans
19. Stability after mandibular setback: Mandible-only versus 2-jaw surgery10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.006 ↗
20. Three-year follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion: Stability and risk factors for relapse10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.03.050 ↗
21. What are the Surgical Movements in Orthognathic Surgery That Most Affect the Upper Airways? A Three-Dimensional Analysis10.1016/j.joms.2020.10.017 ↗
22. Mandibular setback for surgical correction of mandibular hyperplasia— Does it provoke sleep-related breathing disorders?10.1016/S0901-5027(06)80024-X ↗
23. Effect of mandibular setback surgery on the posterior airway size
24. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome following surgery for mandibular prognathism10.1016/0278-2391(87)90016-4 ↗
25. Effects of mandibular retropositioning, with or without maxillary advancement, on the oro-naso-pharyngeal airway and development of sleep-related breathing disorders10.1016/j.joms.2010.02.033 ↗
26. The influence of orthognathic surgery on ventilation during sleep10.1016/j.ijom.2010.10.006 ↗