journal article·2024-10-10Open access

Fall Risk Classification Using Trunk Movement Patterns from Inertial Measurement Units and Mini-BESTest in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Deep Learning Approach

Diego Robles Cruz, Sebastián Puebla Quiñones, Andrea Lira Belmar, Denisse Quintana Figueroa, María Reyes Hidalgo, Carla Taramasco Toro

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

Falls among older adults represent a critical global public health problem, as they are one of the main causes of disability in this age group. We have developed an automated approach to identifying fall risk using low-cost, accessible technology. Trunk movement patterns were collected from 181 older people, with and without a history of falls, during the execution of the Mini-BESTest. Data were captured using smartphone sensors (an accelerometer, a gyroscope, and a magnetometer) and classified based on fall history using deep learning algorithms (LSTM). The classification model achieved an overall accuracy of 88.55% a precision of 90.14%, a recall of 87.93%, and an F1 score of 89.02% by combining all signals from the Mini-BESTest tasks. The performance outperformed the metrics we obtained from individual tasks, demonstrating that aggregating all cues provides a more complete and robust assessment of fall risk in older adults. The results suggest that combining signals from multiple tasks allowed the model to better capture the complexities of postural control and dynamic gait, leading to better prediction of falls. This highlights the potential of integrating multiple assessment modalities for more effective fall risk monitoring.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention · Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems · Gait Recognition and Analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Escuela de Ingeniería Civil Informática, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362905, Chile

Centro de Estudios del Movimiento Humano (CEMH), Escuela de Kinesiología, Facultad de Salud y Odontología, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago 8370179, Chile

Instituto de Tecnología para la Innovación en Salud y Bienestar, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar 2531015, Chile

Center of Interdisciplinary Biomedical and Engineering Research for Health—MEDING, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2362905, Chile

Carrera de Kinesiología, Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago 8330601, Chile

Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar 2531015, Chile

Millennium Nucleus on Sociomedicine, Santiago 7560908, Chile

References (89)

Show source-provided references
1. Prevention of falls in community-dwelling older adults10.1056/NEJMcp1903252 ↗
2. The global burden of falls: Global, regional and national estimates of morbidity and mortality from the Global Burden of Disease Study 201710.1136/injuryprev-2019-043286 ↗
3. World guidelines for falls prevention and management for older adults: A global initiative10.1093/ageing/afac205 ↗
4. Global prevalence of falls in the older adults: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s13018-022-03222-1 ↗
5. The reflection of the fear of falls and risk of falling in walking activity spaces of older adults in various urban environments10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103152 ↗
6. Cost of US emergency department and inpatient visits for fall injuries in older adults10.1016/j.injury.2023.111199 ↗
7. Wu, J., Mu, Z., Jiang, S., Miao, Y., Tang, Y., Wang, J., Wang, S., and Zhao, Y. (2023). Trends in all-cause mortality and leading causes of death from 2009 to 2019 among older adults in China. BMC Geriatr., 23.10.1186/s12877-023-04346-7 ↗
8. World Health Organization (2021). Step Safely: Strategies for Preventing and Managing Falls Across the Life-Course, World Health Organization.
9. Osteoporosis in older adults10.1016/j.jbspin.2021.105135 ↗
10. The prevalence of osteoporotic fractures in the elderly in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1186/s13018-023-04030-x ↗
11. The two faces of postural control in older adults: Stability and function10.1016/j.ebiom.2017.03.030 ↗
12. Aging and balance control in response to external perturbations: Role of anticipatory and compensatory postural mechanisms10.1007/s11357-014-9621-8 ↗
13. Gait variability related to muscle quality and muscle power output in frail nonagenarian older adults10.1016/j.jamda.2015.09.015 ↗
14. Age-related changes in postural control in older women: Transitional tasks in step initiation10.1186/s12877-020-01985-y ↗
15. Van Humbeeck, N., Kliegl, R., and Krampe, R. (2023). Lifespan changes in postural control. Sci. Rep., 13.10.1038/s41598-022-26934-0 ↗
16. Wleklik, M., Uchmanowicz, I., Jankowska, E., Vitale, C., Lisiak, M., Drozd, M., Pobrotyn, P., Tkaczyszyn, M., and Lee, C. (2020). Multidimensional approach to frailty. Front. Psychol., 11.10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00564 ↗
17. The physical frailty syndrome as a transition from homeostatic symphony to cacophony10.1038/s43587-020-00017-z ↗
18. Frailty: A global health challenge in need of local action10.1136/bmjgh-2024-015173 ↗
19. Cognitive frailty as a predictor of future falls in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1016/j.jamda.2022.10.011 ↗
20. Porta, M. (2014). A Dictionary of Epidemiology, Oxford University Press.10.1093/acref/9780199976720.001.0001 ↗
21. Intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with falls in older adults: A case-control study in Mexico
22. Intrinsic and extrinsic risk factor for fall among community dwelling Indonesian elderly10.3889/oamjms.2022.8626 ↗
23. Risk factors for falls among older adults: A review of the literature10.1016/j.maturitas.2013.02.009 ↗
24. The Mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) demonstrates higher accuracy in identifying older adult participants with history of falls than do the BESTest, Berg Balance Scale, or Timed Up and Go Test10.1519/JPT.0000000000000050 ↗
25. Use of the BESTest and the Mini-BESTest for fall risk prediction in community-dwelling older adults between 60 and 102 years of age10.1519/JPT.0000000000000236 ↗
26. Preventing falls in older adults: A multifactorial approach10.1177/1084822306292232 ↗
27. Kim, T., Park, J., Heo, S., Sung, K., and Park, J. (2017). Characterizing dynamic walking patterns and detecting falls with wearable sensors using Gaussian process methods. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17051172 ↗
28. Comparison of seven fall risk assessment tools in community-dwelling Korean older women10.1080/00140139.2016.1176256 ↗
29. Tools for assessing fall risk in the elderly: A systematic review and meta-analysis10.1007/s40520-017-0749-0 ↗
30. Fall risk index for elderly patients based on number of chronic disabilities10.1016/0002-9343(86)90717-5 ↗
31. Balance and its measure in the elderly: A review10.3138/ptc.41.5.240 ↗
32. The dynamic gait index relates to self-reported fall history in individuals with vestibular dysfunction10.3233/VES-2000-10205 ↗
33. Postural orientation and equilibrium: What do we need to know about neural control of balance to prevent falls?10.1093/ageing/afl077 ↗
34. Fall detection and fall risk assessment in older person using wearable sensors: A systematic review10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.08.006 ↗
35. Differences between gait on stairs and flat surfaces in relation to fall risk and future falls10.1109/JBHI.2017.2677901 ↗
36. Measurement of stand-sit and sit-stand transitions using a miniature gyroscope and its application in fall risk evaluation in the elderly10.1109/TBME.2002.800763 ↗
37. Concurrent validation of an index to estimate fall risk in community dwelling seniors through a wireless sensor insole system: A pilot study10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.03.037 ↗
38. Nait Aicha, A., Englebienne, G., Van Schooten, K., Pijnappels, M., and Kröse, B. (2018). Deep learning to predict falls in older adults based on daily-life trunk accelerometry. Sensors, 18.10.3390/s18051654 ↗
39. Drover, D., Howcroft, J., Kofman, J., and Lemaire, E. (2017). Faller classification in older adults using wearable sensors based on turn and straight-walking accelerometer-based features. Sensors, 17.10.3390/s17061321 ↗
40. Accelerometer-based predictive models of fall risk in older women: A pilot study10.1038/s41746-018-0033-5 ↗
41. Novel sensing technology in fall risk assessment in older adults: A systematic review10.1186/s12877-018-0706-6 ↗
42. Prospective fall-risk prediction models for older adults based on wearable sensors10.1109/TNSRE.2017.2687100 ↗
43. Quantitative falls risk estimation through multi-sensor assessment of standing balance10.1088/0967-3334/33/12/2049 ↗
44. Accelerometry-based gait analysis, an additional objective approach to screen subjects at risk for falling10.1016/j.gaitpost.2012.03.015 ↗
45. The harmonic ratio of trunk acceleration predicts falling among older people: Results of a 1-year prospective study10.1186/1743-0003-10-7 ↗
46. Farshchiansadegh, A., and Others Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) (2014, January 26–30). A body machine interface based on inertial sensors. Proceedings of the 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2014.6945026 ↗
47. Kargar, B., Mollahosseini, A., Struemph, T., Pace, W., Nielsen, R., and Mahoor, M. (2014, January 26–30). Automatic measurement of physical mobility in get-up-and-go test using kinect sensor. Proceedings of the 2014 36th Annual International Conference of The IEEE Engineering In Medicine And Biology Society, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944375 ↗
48. The reliability and preliminary validity of game-based fall risk assessment in community-dwelling older adults10.1016/j.gerinurse.2011.02.002 ↗
49. Novel use of the Wii Balance Board to prospectively predict falls in community-dwelling older adults10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2015.03.006 ↗
50. A novel infrared laser device that measures multilateral parameters of stepping performance for assessment of all risk in elderly individuals10.1007/s40520-013-0042-9 ↗
51. Networks for approximation and learning10.1109/5.58326 ↗
52. Support-vector networks10.1007/BF00994018 ↗
53. Makino, K., Lee, S., Bae, S., Chiba, I., Harada, K., Katayama, O., Tomida, K., Morikawa, M., and Shimada, H. (2021). Simplified Decision-Tree Algorithm to Predict Falls for Community-Dwelling Older Adults. J. Clin. Med., 10.10.3390/jcm10215184 ↗
54. Chen, M., Wang, H., Yu, L., Yeung, E.H.K., Luo, J., Tsui, K.-L., and Zhao, Y. (2022). A Systematic Review of Wearable Sensor-Based Technologies for Fall Risk Assessment in Older Adults. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22186752 ↗
55. Toward the development of a falls risk prediction system using wearable sensors: A systematic review
56. Deep Learning-Based Systems Developed for Fall Detection: A Review10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3021943 ↗
57. Sensor-based gait parameter extraction with deep convolutional neural networks10.1109/JBHI.2016.2636456 ↗
58. Deep Neural Networks for Human’s Fall-risk Prediction using Force-Plate Time Series Signal10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115220 ↗
59. Deep Learning for Inertial Positioning: A Survey10.1109/TITS.2024.3381161 ↗
60. Li, Y., and Wang, L. (2022). Human Activity Recognition Based on Residual Network and BiLSTM. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22020635 ↗
61. Deep Residual Bidir-LSTM for Human Activity Recognition Using Wearable Sensors10.1155/2018/7316954 ↗
62. Lee, P., Chen, T.-B., Wang, C.-Y., Hsu, S.-Y., and Liu, C.-H. (2021). Detection of Postural Control in Young and Elderly Adults Using Deep and Machine Learning Methods with Joint–Node Plots. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21093212 ↗
63. Wearables and Deep Learning Classify Fall Risk From Gait in Multiple Sclerosis
64. Deep Learning for Fall Risk Assessment with Inertial Sensors: Utilizing Domain Knowledge in Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters10.1109/JBHI.2019.2958879 ↗
65. Kiprijanovska, I., Dimitrova, G., and Kiprovski, T. (October, January 28). Predictive models for time-series forecasting: Case study for production planning. Proceedings of the 2020 43rd International Convention on Information, Communication and Electronic Technology (MIPRO), Opatija, Croatia.
66. Yıldız, A. (2023). Towards Environment-Aware Fall Risk Assessment: Classifying Walking Surface Conditions Using IMU-Based Gait Data and Deep Learning. Brain Sci., 13.10.3390/brainsci13101428 ↗
67. Cubuk, E.D., Zoph, B., Shlens, J., and Le, Q.V. (2019, January 15–20). AutoAugment: Learning Augmentation Policies from Data. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00020 ↗
68. Wen, Q., Sun, L., Yang, F., Song, X., Gao, J., Wang, X., and Xu, H. (2020). Time Series Data Augmentation for Deep Learning: A Survey. arXiv.10.24963/ijcai.2021/631 ↗
69. Casolaro, A., Capone, V., Iannuzzo, G., and Camastra, F. (2023). Deep Learning for Time Series Forecasting: Advances and Open Problems. Information, 14.10.3390/info14110598 ↗
70. Chandrasekaran, V., Goeckner, D., Wang, J., and Mayeux, R. (2020). Inertial Sensors for Smartphones: Capabilities and Accuracy. Sensors, 20.
71. Accuracy of Accelerometer and Gyroscope in Smartphones: Evaluation and Sensor Fusion
72. Tracking the evolution of smartphone sensing for monitoring human movement10.3390/s150818901 ↗
73. Smartphone-based accelerometers for gait analysis: A validation study with older adults
74. The Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest) to differentiate balance deficits10.2522/ptj.20080071 ↗
75. Action recognition in video sequences using deep bi-directional LSTM with CNN features10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2778011 ↗
76. Cost-effective video summarization using deep CNN with hierarchical weighted fusion for IoT surveillance networks10.1109/JIOT.2019.2950469 ↗
77. Sun, W., Qin, N., Huang, D., Liu, Z., and Ni, S. (2020). QN-S3VM method for evaluation of liver functional reserve. 2020 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC), IEEE.10.1109/CAC51589.2020.9326557 ↗
78. DataCamp (2023, September 15). Cross-Entropy Loss Function in Machine Learning: Enhancing Model Accuracy. Available online: https://www.datacamp.com.
79. Analytics Vidhya (2023, September 15). Binary Cross Entropy/Log Loss for Binary Classification. Analytics Vidhya. Available online: https://www.analyticsvidhya.com.
80. Brownlee, J. (2023, September 15). How to Stop Training Deep Neural Networks at the Right Time Using Early Stopping. Machine Learning Mastery, 2019. Available online: https://machinelearningmastery.com/early-stopping-to-avoid-overtraining-neural-network-models/.
81. Evaluating time series forecasting models: An empirical study on performance estimation methods10.1007/s10994-020-05910-7 ↗
82. Assessing the accuracy of prediction algorithms for classification: An overview10.1093/bioinformatics/16.5.412 ↗
83. A systematic analysis of performance measures for classification tasks10.1016/j.ipm.2009.03.002 ↗
84. Evaluation: From precision, recall and F-measure to ROC, informedness, markedness and correlation
85. Sasaki, Y. (2007). The Truth of the F-Measure, University of Manchester.
86. Brodersen, K.H., Ong, C.S., Stephan, K.E., and Buhmann, J.M. (2010, January 23–26). The balanced accuracy and its posterior distribution. Proceedings of the 2010 20th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Istanbul, Turkey.10.1109/ICPR.2010.764 ↗
87. Time-series cross-validation
88. Michie, D., Spiegelhalter, D.J., and Taylor, C.C. (1994). Machine Learning, Neural and Statistical Classification, Ellis Horwood.
89. A Machine Learning Approach to Identify Fall Risk for Older Adults10.1016/j.smhl.2022.100303 ↗