journal article·2024-11-12Open access

Automatic Watershed Segmentation of Cancerous Lesions in Unsupervised Breast Histology Images

Vincent Majanga, Ernest Mnkandla

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 22

Abstract

Segmentation of nuclei in histology images is key in analyzing and quantifying morphology changes of nuclei features and tissue structures. Conventional diagnosis, segmenting, and detection methods have relied heavily on the manual-visual inspection of histology images. These methods are only effective on clearly visible cancerous lesions on histology images thus limited in their performance due to the complexity of tissue structures in histology images. Hence, early detection of breast cancer is key for treatment and profits from Computer-Aided-Diagnostic (CAD) systems introduced to efficiently and automatically segment and detect nuclei cells in pathology. This paper proposes, an automatic watershed segmentation method of cancerous lesions in unsupervised human breast histology images. Firstly, this approach pre-processes data through various augmentation methods to increase the size of dataset images, then a stain normalization technique is applied to these augmented images to isolate nuclei features from tissue structures. Secondly, data enhancement techniques namely; erosion, dilation, and distance transform are used to highlight foreground and background pixels while removing unwanted regions from the highlighted nuclei objects on the image. Consequently, the connected components method groups these highlighted pixel components with similar intensity values and, assigns them to their relevant labeled component binary mask. Once all binary masked groups have been determined, a deep-learning recurrent neural network from the Keras architecture uses this information to automatically segment nuclei objects with cancerous lesions and their edges on the image via watershed filling. This segmentation method is evaluated on an unsupervised, augmented human breast cancer histology dataset of 11,151 images. This proposed method produced a significant evaluation result of 98% F1-accuracy score.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: AI in cancer detection · Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging · Digital Imaging for Blood Diseases

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Computer Science, Centre for Augmented Intelligence and Data Science—CAIDS, School of Computing, Unisa Science Campus, Johannesburg 1709, South Africa

Funding

University of South Africa

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: Experience from a large study with long-term follow-up10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00229.x ↗
2. Automatic segmentation in breast cancer using watershed algorithm
3. Nayak, T., Bhat, N., Bhat, V., Shetty, S., Javed, M., and Nagabhushan, P. (2019). Automatic segmentation and breast density estimation for cancer detection using an efficient watershed algorithm. Data Analytics and Learning: Proceedings of DAL 2018, Springer.10.1007/978-981-13-2514-4_29 ↗
4. Kaur, A., Rashid, M., Bashir, A.K., and Parah, S.A. (2022). Detection of breast cancer masses in mammogram images with watershed segmentation and machine learning approach. Artificial Intelligence for Innovative Healthcare Informatics, Springer.10.1007/978-3-030-96569-3_2 ↗
5. Mammogram Breast Cancer Detection using Fast Watershed Segmentation
6. Sadad, T., Hussain, A., Munir, A., Habib, M., Ali Khan, S., Hussain, S., Yang, S., and Alawairdhi, M. (2020). Identification of breast malignancy by marker-controlled watershed transformation and hybrid feature set for healthcare. Appl. Sci., 10.10.3390/app10061900 ↗
7. Veta, M., Huisman, A., Viergever, M.A., van Diest, P.J., and Pluim, J.P. (April, January 30). Marker-controlled watershed segmentation of nuclei in H&E stained breast cancer biopsy images. Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Chicago, IL, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2011.5872483 ↗
8. Lal, S., Desouza, R., Maneesh, M., Kanfade, A., Kumar, A., Perayil, G., Alabhya, K., Chanchal, A.K., and Kini, J. (2020, January 27–28). A robust method for nuclei segmentation of H&E stained histopathology images. Proceedings of the 2020 7th International Conference on Signal Processing and Integrated Networks (SPIN), Noida, India.10.1109/SPIN48934.2020.9070874 ↗
9. Automated segmentation technique with self-driven post-processing for histopathological breast cancer images10.1049/trit.2019.0077 ↗
10. Improved threshold based and trainable fully automated segmentation for breast cancer boundary and pectoral muscle in mammogram images10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3036072 ↗
11. Kiran, I., Raza, B., Ijaz, A., and Khan, M.A. (2022). DenseRes-Unet: Segmentation of overlapped/clustered nuclei from multi organ histopathology images. Comput. Biol. Med., 143.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.105267 ↗
12. Cell nuclei segmentation in cytological images using convolutional neural network and seeded watershed algorithm10.1007/s10278-019-00200-8 ↗
13. Hu, H., Qiao, S., Hao, Y., Bai, Y., Cheng, R., Zhang, W., and Zhang, G. (2022). Breast cancer histopathological images recognition based on two-stage nuclei segmentation strategy. PLoS ONE, 17.10.1371/journal.pone.0266973 ↗
14. Natarajan, V.A., Kumar, M.S., Patan, R., Kallam, S., and Mohamed, M.Y.N. (2020, January 9–10). Segmentation of nuclei in histopathology images using fully convolutional deep neural architecture. Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE International Conference on Computing and Information Technology (ICCIT-1441), Tabuk, Saudi Arabia.10.1109/ICCIT-144147971.2020.9213817 ↗
15. Guatemala-Sanchez, V.R., Peregrina-Barreto, H., and Lopez-Armas, G. (2021, January 26–30). Nuclei segmentation on histopathology images of breast carcinoma. Proceedings of the 2021 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Guadalajara, Mexico.
16. Integrating deep convolutional neural networks with marker-controlled watershed for overlapping nuclei segmentation in histopathology images10.1016/j.neucom.2019.09.083 ↗
17. Content-based image retrieval algorithm for nuclei segmentation in histopathology images: CBIR algorithm for histopathology image segmentation10.1007/s11042-020-09797-3 ↗
18. Vahadane, A., and Sethi, A. (2013, January 10–13). Towards generalized nuclear segmentation in histological images. Proceedings of the 13th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering, Chania, Greece.10.1109/BIBE.2013.6701556 ↗
19. Shen, P., Qin, W., Yang, J., Hu, W., Chen, S., Li, L., Wen, T., and Gu, J. (2015, January 19). Segmenting multiple overlapping nuclei in H&E stained breast cancer histopathology images based on an improved watershed. Proceedings of the 2015 IET International Conference on Biomedical Image and Signal Processing (ICBISP 2015), Beijing, China.
20. Veta, M., Van Diest, P.J., Kornegoor, R., Huisman, A., Viergever, M.A., and Pluim, J.P. (2013). Automatic nuclei segmentation in H&E stained breast cancer histopathology images. PLoS ONE, 8.10.1371/journal.pone.0070221 ↗
21. Baker, Q.B., Banat, S., Eaydat, E., and Alsmirat, M. (November, January 28). Automated detection of benign and malignant in breast histopathology images. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACS 15th International Conference on Computer Systems and Applications (AICCSA), Aqaba, Jordan.10.1109/AICCSA.2018.8612799 ↗
22. Shu, J., Fu, H., Qiu, G., Kaye, P., and Ilyas, M. (2013, January 3–7). Segmenting overlapping cell nuclei in digital histopathology images. Proceedings of the 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Osaka, Japan.
23. Dental images’ segmentation using threshold connected component analysis10.1155/2021/2921508 ↗
24. Differential data augmentation techniques for medical imaging classification tasks
25. Garcea, F., Serra, A., Lamberti, F., and Morra, L. (2023). Data augmentation for medical imaging: A systematic literature review. Comput. Biol. Med., 152.10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106391 ↗
26. Araújo, T., Aresta, G., Castro, E., Rouco, J., Aguiar, P., Eloy, C., Polónia, A., and Campilho, A. (2017). Classification of breast cancer histology images using convolutional neural networks. PLoS ONE, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0177544 ↗
27. Breast cancer histopathology image analysis: A review10.1109/TBME.2014.2303852 ↗
28. Macenko, M., Niethammer, M., Marron, J.S., Borland, D., Woosley, J.T., Guan, X., Schmitt, C., and Thomas, N.E. (July, January 28). A method for normalizing histology slides for quantitative analysis. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, Boston, MA, USA.10.1109/ISBI.2009.5193250 ↗