journal article·2024-10-15Open access

Feature Selection with Small Data Sets: Identifying Feature Importance for Predictive Classification of Return-to-Work Date after Knee Arthroplasty

Harald H. Rietdijk, Daniël O. Strijbos, Patricia Conde-Cespedes, Talko B. Dijkhuis, Hilbrand K. E. Oldenhuis, Maria Trocan

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

In recent decades, the number of cases of knee arthroplasty among people of working age has increased. The integrated clinical pathway ‘back at work after surgery’ is an initiative to reduce the possible cost of sick leave. The evaluation of this pathway, like many clinical studies, faces the challenge of small data sets with a relatively high number of features. In this study, we investigate the possibility of identifying features that are important in determining the duration of rehabilitation, expressed in the return-to-work period, by using feature selection tools. Several models are used to classify the patient’s data into two classes, and the results are evaluated based on the accuracy and the quality of the ordering of the features, for which we introduce a ranking score. A selection of estimators are used in an optimization step, reorganizing the feature ranking. The results show that for some models, the proposed optimization results in a better ordering of the features. The ordering of the features is evaluated visually and identified by the ranking score. Furthermore, for all models, higher accuracy, with a maximum of 91%, is achieved by applying the optimization process. The features that are identified as relevant for the duration of the return-to-work period are discussed and provide input for further research.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms · Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Lectoraat Digital Transformation, Hanze University of Applied Sciences, 9747AS Groningen, The Netherlands

Department of Public and Occupational Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Department of Health Innovations, Nij Smellinghe Hospital Drachten, 9202NN Drachten, The Netherlands

Institut Supérieur d’Électronique de Paris (ISEP), 75006 Paris, France

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. Hip and knee replacement 2 Knee replacement10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32344-4 ↗
2. Future projections of total hip and knee arthroplasty in the UK: Results from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink10.1016/j.joca.2014.12.022 ↗
3. Projections of Primary and Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 203010.2106/00004623-200704000-00012 ↗
4. Hardenberg, M., Speklé, E.M., Coenen, P., Brus, I.M., and Kuijer, P.P.F. (2022). The economic burden of knee and hip osteoarthritis: Absenteeism and costs in the Dutch workforce. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 23.10.1186/s12891-022-05306-9 ↗
5. Implementation of back at work after surgery (BAAS): A feasibility study of an integrated pathway for improved return to work after knee arthroplasty10.1002/msc.1633 ↗
6. Strijbos, D.O., van der Sluis, G., van Houtert, W.F., Straat, A.C., van Zaanen, Y., de Groot, S., Klomp, S., Krijnen, W.P., Kooijman, C.M., and van den Brand, I. (2023). Protocol for a multicenter study on effectiveness and economics of the Back At work After Surgery (BAAS): A clinical pathway for knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord., 24.10.1186/s12891-023-06203-5 ↗
7. Feature Selection: A Review and Comparative Study10.1051/e3sconf/202235101046 ↗
8. Pudjihartono, N., Fadason, T., Kempa-Liehr, A.W., and O’Sullivan, J.M. (2022). A Review of Feature Selection Methods for Machine Learning-Based Disease Risk Prediction. Front. Bioinform., 2.10.3389/fbinf.2022.927312 ↗
9. Enhancing Explainable Machine Learning by Reconsidering Initially Unselected Items in Feature Selection for Classification10.3390/biomedinformatics2040047 ↗
10. Rajput, D., Wang, W.J., and Chen, C.C. (2023). Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications. BMC Bioinform., 24.10.1186/s12859-023-05156-9 ↗
11. Concurrent validity of the PAM accelerometer relative to the MTI Actigraph using oxygen consumption as a reference10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00740.x ↗
12. The iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire: A Standardized Instrument for Measuring and Valuing Health-Related Productivity Losses10.1016/j.jval.2015.05.009 ↗
13. The de Morton Mobility Index (DEMMI): An essential health index for an ageing world
14. The 6-minute walk: A new measure of exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure
15. The reliability and validity of the 30-second chair stand test and modified four square step test in persons with multiple sclerosis
16. The repetitive Five-Times-Sit-To-Stand test: Its reliability in older adults10.12968/ijtr.2013.20.3.122 ↗
17. Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review10.1007/s00420-011-0659-y ↗
18. A reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to score the impact of knee complaints on work following total knee arthroplasty: The WORQ10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.016 ↗
19. The Dutch Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI): Factor Analysis, Discriminative Power, and Test-Retest Reliability10.1097/AJP.0000000000000306 ↗
20. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS)10.1002/acr.20632 ↗
21. Tackling Overfitting in Boosting for Noisy Healthcare Data10.1109/TKDE.2019.2959988 ↗
22. Scikit-Learn (2024, August 23). RFE—Scikit-Learn 1.5.1 Documentation. Available online: https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.feature_selection.RFE.html.
23. A Clustering Approach for Personalized Coaching Applications