journal article·2024-10-11Open access

Dynamic Investigations of Shared Bicycle Operators’ Competition Based on Profit Maximization

Lishuang Bian, Qizhou Hu, Xin Zhang, Xiaoyu Wu, Minjia Tan

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

With the rise of the sharing economy, shared bicycles have become an important component of urban transportation. This paper explores the nonlinear dual oligopoly system for the Cournot model in the bike-sharing market; both operators have maximized profits as their competitive goals. The analysis of pivotal factors influencing passenger preferences, including pricing discounts and comfort levels, is meticulously depicted by a bifurcation diagram. A new chaotic attractor—the shared bicycle attractor—is discovered. The research results indicate that larger discounts and adjustment speeds can cause the system to be in a chaotic state, which is not conducive to the long-term development of operators, although discounts can indeed attract more passengers to a certain extent. On the other hand, the increase in the marginal cost of comfort loss can also make it difficult for enterprises to operate, which requires continuous technological innovation to improve the comfort of cycling.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing · Transportation and Mobility Innovations · Transportation Planning and Optimization

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Automation, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing 210094, China

Ocean College, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212003, China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Highlevel Project of the Top Six Talents in Jiangsu Province · Key Science and Technology Program in Henan Province · China Scholarship Council

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Bike-Share Systems: Accessibility and Availability10.1287/mnsc.2019.3407 ↗
2. Prediction of Bike Share Demand by Machine Learning: Role of Vehicle Accident as the New Feature
3. Bike-sharing duopoly competition under government regulation10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121121 ↗
4. Research on a Shared Bicycle Deposit Management System Based on Blockchain Technology10.1155/2020/8854082 ↗
5. Caggiani, L., and Camporeale, R. (2021, January 7–10). Accessibility indicators for fair bike-sharing systems based on level of service. Proceedings of the 21st IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering/5th IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I and CPS Europe), Bari, Italy.
6. Enterprise Ownership Arrangements- Review and Commentary on Relevant Theories
7. Government regulation strategy for the maintenance of bike sharing10.1108/K-05-2022-0788 ↗
8. Cui, W., and Xiao, G. (2021). Tripartite Dynamic Game among Government, Bike-Sharing Enterprises, and Consumers under the Influence of Seasons and Quota. Sustainability, 13.10.3390/su132011221 ↗
9. Radio-frequency Identification (RFID) adoption and chain structure decisions in competing supply chains: Bertrand competition versus Cournot competition
10. The stability of a dynamic duopoly Cournot–Bertrand game model10.1016/j.cam.2022.114399 ↗
11. Stability of equilibrium price-production of dynamic duopoly Bertrand–Cournot game in a transnational supply chain with asymmetric information10.2478/amns.2021.2.00328 ↗
12. Product Quality and Quantity Decision of Bike-sharing Supply Chain Based on Smart Contract
13. Hu, M., Chen, X., Cheng, L., Wang, P., and Qi, C. (2019). Analysis of Vehicle Investment Scale of Shared Bike Enterprises Based on Game Theory. Quality Transportation and Collaborative Governance: Proceedings of the 2019 China Urban Transportation Planning Annual Conference, China Urban Planning Society.
14. Wei, B., and Zhu, L. (2023). Exploring the Impact of Built Environment Factors on the Relationships between Bike Sharing and Public Transportation: A Case Study of New York. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 12.10.3390/ijgi12070293 ↗
15. Liu, Q., Yang, J., Guo, Q., Huang, J., and Wang, J. (2018, January 5–8). Game Analysis on the Development of Shared Bicycle in Xi’an. Proceedings of the 18th COTA International Conference of Transportation Professionals, Beijing, China.
16. Hail a cab or ride a bike? A travel time comparison of taxi and bicycle-sharing systems in New York City10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.006 ↗
17. The study of Coopetition between Public Bus and Bike Sharing based on Environmental Protection10.1051/e3sconf/201913604015 ↗
18. How Built Environment Influence Public Bicycle Usage: Evidence from the Bicycle Sharing System in Qiaobei Area, Nanjing
19. Jin, H., Jin, F., Wang, J., Sun, W., and Dong, L. (2019). Competition and Cooperation between Shared Bicycles and Public Transit: A Case Study of Beijing. Sustainability, 11.10.3390/su11051323 ↗
20. Tang, H., and Zhou, D. (2024). Understanding the Competition and Cooperation between Dockless Bike-Sharing and Metro Systems in View of Mobility. Sustainability, 16.10.3390/su16135780 ↗
21. Short-term planning and policy interventions to promote cycling in urban centers: Findings from a commute mode choice analysis in Barcelona, Spain10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.007 ↗
22. Dai, G., Zeng, B., and Liu, J. (2020, January 20–22). Competitive Game Analysis of Shared Bicycles at Different Stages. Proceedings of the 2020 2nd International Conference on Economic Management and Model Engineering, Chongqing, China.10.1109/ICEMME51517.2020.00036 ↗
23. Research on the Impact of Government Incentives and Quality Input on the Equilibrium of Bike Sharing Service Networks
24. Dynamic market share through advertising and loyalty reward programs: A case study of Ofo versus Mobike10.1051/ro/2022166 ↗
25. A Heteroscedastic Polarized Logit Model to Investigate the Competition of Bicycle for the Bikeable Trips with the Other Modes10.1177/0361198118796357 ↗
26. Wu, K., Chen, S., and Yuan, Y. (2018, January 13–15). Research on the Customer Loyalty of Bicycle-sharing Company Based on PLS-SEM Model. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Management Engineering, Software Engineering and Service Sciences (ICMSS), Wuhan, China.10.1145/3180374.3181358 ↗
27. Analysis of the competition strategy of the shared bicycle oligopoly market
28. Analysis on price competition strategy of China’s bike-sharing industry under oligopoly
29. Yu, C., Chai, Y., and Liu, Y. (2017, January 4–6). Pricing mechanism research in duopoly online bicycle-sharing market: A game theory approach. Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on e-Business Engineering (ICEBE), Shanghai, China.10.1109/ICEBE.2017.11 ↗
30. Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly10.2307/2555525 ↗
31. Strategic interactions between transport operators with several goals
32. Competition in complementary transport services10.1016/j.trb.2013.12.004 ↗
33. Nonlinear dynamics of a quantum Cournot duopoly game with heterogeneous players10.1007/s11128-019-2338-y ↗
34. Dynamic investigations in a duopoly game with price competition based on relative profit and profit maximization10.1016/j.cam.2019.112464 ↗
35. 13. Chaotic Dynamics: Theory and Applications to Economics10.2307/2983191 ↗
36. Street morphology and travel by dockless shared bicycles in Beijing, China10.1080/15568318.2020.1813853 ↗
37. Chaotic Dynamics at the Boundary of a Basin of Attraction via Non-transversal Intersections for a Non-global Smooth Diffeomorphism10.1007/s00332-024-10079-7 ↗
38. Sharp changes in fractal basin of attraction in passive dynamic walking10.1007/s11071-023-08913-w ↗