journal article·2024-09-19Open access

Evaluation of a Three-Dimensional Printed Interventional Simulator for Cardiac Ablation Therapy Training

Carlo Saija, Sachin Sabu, Lisa Leung, Ellie Lowe, Noor Al-Bahrani, Marco Antonio Coutinho Pinto, Mark Herridge, Nadia M. Chowdhury, Gregory Gibson, Calum Byrne, Adharvan Gabbeta, Ewen Marion, Rashi Chavan, Jonathan Behar, Antonia Agapi Pontiki, Pierre Berthet-Rayne, Richard James Housden, Kawal Rhode

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 18

Abstract

Cardiac ablation (CA) is an interventional electrophysiological procedure used to disrupt arrhythmic substrates in the myocardium by inducing localized scarring. Current CA training relies on the master–apprentice model. In different fields of medicine including CA, virtual and physical simulators have proven to enhance, and even outperform, conventional training modalities while providing a risk-free learning environment. Despite the benefits, high costs and operational difficulties limit the widespread use of interventional simulators. Our previous research introduced a low-cost CA simulator using a 3D-printed biatrial cardiac model, successfully recording ten ablation lesions on the phantom myocardium. In this work, we present and evaluate an enhanced version: compared to the previous version, the cardiac phantom’s electrical behavior and ablation settings were optimized to produce consistent lesions, while 3D-printed components improved the haptic and radiographic properties of the simulator. Seven cardiologists compared the experimental simulator’s performance to the leading commercial system from Heartroid in a 24-question survey on a 5-point Likert scale. The four following areas of fidelity were considered: catheter entry, anatomical correctness, radiographic appearance, and mapping and ablation. The experimental simulator significantly outperformed the commercial system (p < 0.01), particularly in radiographic appearance (p < 0.01). The results show the potential for the experimental simulator in routine CA training.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments · Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies · Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Biomedical Engineering & Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK

Caranx Medical, 06200 Nice, France

Guy’s and St. Thomas’s NHS Foundation Trust, London SE1 7EH, UK

St. George’s Hospital, London SW17 0QT, UK

Biosense Webster, Irvine, CA 92618, USA

Funding

Wellcome Centre for Medical Engineering at King’s College London · British Heart Foundation (BHF) Centre of Excellence at King’s College London · Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC) through the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) MedTech · Vitro Diagnostic Co-operative (MIC) Award for Cardiovascular Diseases to Guy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust in partnership with King’s College London · Caranx Medical

References (24)

Show source-provided references
1. (2024, September 11). Arrhythmia—NHS. Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/arrhythmia/.
2. Global, regional, and national prevalence, incidence, mortality, and risk factors for atrial fibrillation, 1990–2017: Results from the global burden of disease study 201710.1093/ehjqcco/qcaa061 ↗
3. Global Epidemiology of Atrial Fibrillation10.1038/nrcardio.2014.118 ↗
4. Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: An Overview for Clinicians10.1007/s12325-017-0590-z ↗
5. Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: PULSED AF Pivotal Trial10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.063988 ↗
6. How to perform pulmonary vein isolation
7. Superiority of simulator-based training compared with conventional training methodologies in the performance of Transseptal Catheterization10.1016/j.jacc.2011.02.063 ↗
8. Simulator training reduces radiation exposure and improves trainees’ performance in placing electrophysiologic catheters during patient-based procedures10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.04.015 ↗
9. A systematic review of simulation-based training in Vascular surgery10.1016/j.jss.2022.05.009 ↗
10. (2024, September 11). Angio Mentor Surgical Science. Available online: https://surgicalscience.com/simulators/angio-mentor/.
11. (2024, September 11). Platforms (2023) Surgical Science. Available online: https://surgicalscience.com/simulators/angio-mentor/platforms/.
12. (2024, September 06). EP Model (2024) Heartroid. Available online: https://www.heartroid.com/ep/.
13. Wang, S., Saija, C., Choo, J., Ou, Z., Birsoan, M., Germanos, S., Rothwell, J., Vakili, B., Kotadia, I., and Xu, Z. (2022). Cardiac radiofrequency ablation simulation using a 3D-printed bi-atrial thermochromic model. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12136553 ↗
14. An infant Phantom for pediatric pericardial access and electrophysiology training10.1016/j.hroo.2022.02.010 ↗
15. Development of simulation combining a physical heart model and three-dimensional system for electrophysiology training10.1111/pace.13508 ↗
16. Sensor-based Electromagnetic Navigation (Mediguide): How accurate is it? A phantom model study10.1111/jce.12741 ↗
17. (2024, September 11). Safety Data Sheet: Anycubic 3D Printing UV Sensitive Resin (2021). Available online: https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0245/5519/2380/files/EN_SDS_3D_Printing_UV_Sensitive_Resin___SDS_SGS_GHS_ANNEXII_CLP_2021616_SGS-SHENZHEN-03_Shenzhen_Anycubic_Technology_Co._Ltd.pdf?v=1660036934.
18. (2024, September 11). X-ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients—Table 3 NIST, Available online: https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/tab3.html.
19. ICRP (2009). Adult Reference Computational Phantoms, ICRP. ICRP Publication 110.
20. Britannica, The Editors of Encyclopaedia (2024, September 06). “Resistivity”. Available online: https://www.britannica.com/science/resistivity.
21. Chougule, V., Mulay, A., and Ahuja, B.B. (2017, January 7–9). Clinical Case Study: Spine Modeling for Minimum Invasive Spine Surgeries (MISS) using Rapid Prototyping. Proceedings of the COPENA, Chennai, India.
22. Effect of baseline impedance on ablation lesion dimensions10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006690 ↗
23. Electrical conductivity and permittivity of murine myocardium10.1109/TBME.2009.2012401 ↗
24. Miklavčič, D., Pavšelj, N., and Hart, F.X. (2006). Electric properties of tissues. Wiley Encycl. Biomed. Eng.10.1002/9780471740360.ebs0403 ↗