journal article·2010-06

Size Scaling of Tensile Failure Stress in a Float Soda–Lime–Silicate Glass

Andrew A. Wereszczak, Timothy P. Kirkland, Meredith E. Ragan, Kevin T. Strong, Hua‐Tay Lin, Parimal Patel

Publisher page

Abstract

The (tensile) strength–size scaling of a float soda–lime–silicate glass was studied using biaxial flexure and Hertzian ring crack initiation testing. The examined Weibull effective areas spanned ∼0.4–48,000 mm 2 . Both the air and tin sides were tested. The air side was stronger than the tin side as others have observed; however, the differences in their characteristic strengths decreased with a decreasing effective area, and their strengths converged for effective areas smaller than ∼100 mm 2 . The failure stress at the smallest effective area examined for the tin side was ∼500% greater than that at the largest effective area, while that difference was ∼250% for the air side. A Weibull modulus change at ∼100 mm 2 suggests different strength‐limiting flaw types were dominant below and above this effective area. These results reinforce the importance of the interpretation and use of the tensile strength of glass in context to how much of its area is being subjected to tensile stress.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Building materials and conservation · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials · Glass properties and applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. A Statistical Theory of the Strength of Materials
2. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb14413.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1964.tb14413.x ↗
3. ASTM C 1683. · 2008
4. The Strength and Weakness of Brittle Materials
5. Test Methodology for Strength Testing of Soda–Lime–Silica Float Glass Before and After Enameling
6. 10.1007/BF0113497010.1007/BF01134970 ↗
7. ASTM C 1326. · 2008
8. 10.1002/9780470456286.ch1110.1002/9780470456286.ch11 ↗
9. A. A.Wereszczak T. P.Kirkland K. T.StrongJr. andT. J.Holmquist “ORNL Quasi‐Static Mechanical Characterization and Analysis: FY09 Annual Report to TARDEC ” ORNL/TM‐2009/234 December 2009.10.2172/970913 ↗
10. ASTM C 1499. · 2008
11. 10.1002/9780470584330.ch810.1002/9780470584330.ch8 ↗
12. 10.1017/CBO978113917173110.1017/CBO9781139171731 ↗
13. 10.1098/rspa.1973.008210.1098/rspa.1973.0082 ↗
14. 10.1007/BF0111759310.1007/BF01117593 ↗
15. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02522.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02522.x ↗
16. ASTM C 1239. · 2008
17. R. L.Barnett P. C.Hermann J. R.Wingfield andC. L.Conners“Fracture of Brittle Materials Under Transient Mechanical and Thermal Loading ” Technical Report AFFDL‐TR‐66‐220 March 1967.10.21236/AD0649978 ↗
18. Freudenthal A. M. · 1968 · 591
19. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02514.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02514.x ↗
20. Gulati S. T. · 2001 · 317
21. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00352.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.2002.tb00352.x ↗
22. R.Akcakaya S.Gulati andJ. R.Varner. “Fatigue Behavior of Surface Flaws on Air Vs. Tin Side of Soda–Lime–Silica Float Glass: Paper T4.3 in Glass in the New Millennium: Challenges and Break‐Through Technologies ”Proceedings of the ICG Annual Meeting 2000 (Amsterdam The Netherlands May 15–17 2000) National Committee Netherlands Glass Industry (NCNG) 2000.
23. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1975.tb19593.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1975.tb19593.x ↗
24. MIL‐O‐13830A “Optical Components for Fire Control Instruments; General Specification Governing the Manufacture Assembly and Inspection Of ” September 1963.
25. 10.1179/174367510X1267712137454610.1179/174367510X12677121374546 ↗
26. 10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02517.x10.1111/j.1744-7402.2010.02517.x ↗
27. 10.1002/9780470294741.ch1710.1002/9780470294741.ch17 ↗