journal article·2024-04-25Open access

Monitoring Horizontal Displacements with Low-Cost GNSS Systems Using Relative Positioning: Performance Analysis

Burak Akpınar, Seda Özarpacı

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 9

Abstract

Monitoring horizontal displacements, such as landslides and tectonic movements, holds great importance and high-cost geodetic GNSS equipment stands as a crucial tool for the precise determination of these displacements. As the utilization of low-cost GNSS systems continues to rise, there is a burgeoning interest in evaluating their efficacy in measuring such displacements. This evaluation is particularly vital as it explores the potential of these systems as alternatives to high-cost geodetic GNSS systems in similar applications, thereby contributing to their widespread adoption. In this study, we delve into the assessment of the potential of the dual-frequency U-Blox Zed-F9P GNSS system in conjunction with a calibrated survey antenna (AS-ANT2BCAL) for determining horizontal displacements. To simulate real-world scenarios, the Zeiss BRT 006 basis-reduktionstachymeter was employed as a simulation device, enabling the creation of horizontal displacements across nine different magnitudes, ranging from 2 mm to 50 mm in increments of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm. The accuracies of these simulated displacements were tested through low-cost GNSS observations conducted over a 24 h period in open-sky conditions. Additionally, variations in observation intervals, including 3, 6, 8, and 12 h intervals, were investigated, alongside the utilization of the relative positioning method. Throughout the testing phase, GNSS data were processed using the GAMIT/GLOBK GNSS (v10.7) software, renowned for its accuracy and reliability in geodetic applications. The insightful findings gleaned from these extensive tests shed light on the system’s capabilities, revealing crucial information regarding its minimum detectable displacements. Specifically, the results indicate that the minimum detectable displacements with the 3-sigma rule stand at 22.8 mm, 11.7 mm, 8.7 mm, and 4.8 mm for 3 h, 6 h, 8 h, and 12 h GNSS observations, respectively. Such findings are instrumental in comprehending the system’s performance under varying conditions, thereby informing decision-making processes and facilitating the adoption of suitable GNSS solutions for horizontal displacement monitoring tasks.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: GNSS positioning and interference · Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies · Inertial Sensor and Navigation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Geomatics Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, 34220 Istanbul, Turkey

References (36)

Show source-provided references
1. Arrest of the Mw 6.8 January 24, 2020 Elaziğ (Turkey) earthquake by shallow fault creep10.1016/j.epsl.2023.118085 ↗
2. Characterization of the co-seismic pattern and slip distribution of the February 06, 2023, Kahramanmaraş (Turkey) earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) with a dense GNSS network10.1016/j.tecto.2023.230041 ↗
3. A GNSS velocity field for crustal deformation studies: The influence of glacial isostatic adjustment on plate motion models10.1093/gji/ggac047 ↗
4. Real-time high-precision landslide displacement monitoring based on a GNSS CORS network10.1016/j.measurement.2023.113056 ↗
5. Performance evaluation of a real-time high-precision landslide displacement detection algorithm based on GNSS virtual reference station technology10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111457 ↗
6. Segina, E., Peternel, T., Urbancic, T., Realini, E., Zupan, M., Jez, J., Caldera, S., Gatti, A., Tagliaferro, G., and Consoli, A. (2020). Monitoring Surface Displacement of a Deep-Seated Landslide by a Low-Cost and near Real-Time GNSS System. Remote Sens., 12.10.3390/rs12203375 ↗
7. Real-time monitoring for fast deformations using GNSS low-cost receivers, Geomatics10.1080/19475705.2014.966867 ↗
8. Hamza, V., Stopar, B., Sterle, O., and Pavlovcic, P. (2023). A Cost-Effective GNSS Solution for Continuous Monitoring of Landslides. Remote Sens., 15.10.3390/rs15092287 ↗
9. Bridge monitoring using multi-GNSS observations with high cutoff elevations: A case study10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108303 ↗
10. Dynamic displacement monitoring by integrating high-rate GNSS and accelerometer: On the possibility of downsampling GNSS data at reference stations10.1007/s10291-023-01500-x ↗
11. High-rate (20Hz) single-frequency GPS/GALILEO variometric approach for real-time structural health monitoring and rapid risk assessment10.1016/j.asr.2022.05.074 ↗
12. Caldera, S., Barindelli, S., Sanso, F., and Pardi, L. (2022). Monitoring of Structures and Infrastructures by Low-Cost GNSS Receivers. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app122312468 ↗
13. From Interseismic Deformation with Near-Repeating Earthquakes to Co-Seismic Rupture: A Unified View of the 2020 Mw6.8 Sivrice (Elazığ) Eastern Turkey Earthquake10.1029/2021JB021830 ↗
14. Determination of Recent Tectonic Deformations Along the Tuz Gölü Fault Zone in Central Anatolia (Turkey) with Gnss Observations
15. Spatiotemporal distributions of interplate coupling in Tohoku, northeast Japan, for 14 years prior to the 2011 Tohoku-oki earthquake inverted from GNSS data10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229479 ↗
16. GNSS techniques for real-time monitoring of landslides: A review10.1186/s43020-023-00095-5 ↗
17. Performance of Single Base RTK GNSS Method versus Network RTK10.15446/esrj.v19n2.51218 ↗
18. The potential of GPS Precise Point Positioning method for point displacement monitoring: A case study10.1016/j.measurement.2016.05.074 ↗
19. Investigating Performance of High-Rate GNSS-PPP and PPP-AR for Structural Health Monitoring: Dynamic Tests on Shake Table10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000343 ↗
20. High rate GNSS kinematic PPP method performance for monitoring the engineering structures: Shake table tests under different satellite configurations10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110451 ↗
21. Bridge monitoring using BDS-RTK and GPS-RTK techniques10.1016/j.measurement.2018.02.001 ↗
22. Zuliani, D., Tunini, L., Traglia, F.D., Chersich, M., and Curone, D. (2022). Cost-Effective, Single-Frequency GPS Network as a Tool for Landslide Monitoring. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22093526 ↗
23. Landslide monitoring analysis of single-frequency BDS/GPS combined positioning with constraints on deformation characteristics10.1080/00396265.2018.1467075 ↗
24. Differential single-frequency GPS monitoring of the La Valette landslide (French Alps)10.1016/j.enggeo.2005.01.015 ↗
25. Janos, D., and Kuras, P. (2021). Evaluation of Low-Cost GNSS Receiver under Demanding Conditions in RTK Network Mode. Sensors, 21.10.3390/s21165552 ↗
26. Hamza, V., Stopar, B., Ambrozic, T., Turk, G., and Sterle, O. (2020). Testing Multi-Frequency Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Geodetic Monitoring Purposes. Sensors, 20.10.3390/s20164375 ↗
27. Performance of low-cost GNSS equipment in monitoring of horizontal displacements10.1080/00396265.2023.2179910 ↗
28. Feasibility analysis of the performance of low-cost GNSS receivers in monitoring dynamic motion10.1016/j.measurement.2022.111819 ↗
29. Low-cost GNSS receiver in RTK positioning under the standard ISO-17123-8: A feasible option in geomatics10.1016/j.measurement.2019.01.045 ↗
30. Biagi, L., Grec, C.F., and Negretti, M. (2016). Low-Cost GNSS Receivers for Local Monitoring: Experimental Simulation, and Analysis of Displacements. Sensors, 16.10.3390/s16122140 ↗
31. Hamza, V., Stopar, B., Sterle, O., and Pavlovcic-Preseren, P. (2023). Low-Cost Dual-Frequency GNSS Receivers and Antennas for Surveying in Urban Areas. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23052861 ↗
32. Robustelli, U., Cutugno, M., and Publiano, G. (2023). Low-Cost GNSS and PPP-RTK: Investigating the Capabilities of the u-blox ZED-F9P Module. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23136074 ↗
33. Herring, T.A., King, R.W., and McClusky, S.C. (2009). Introduction to GAMIT/GLOBK, Release 10.35; Massachussetts Institute of Technology.
34. (2024, March 26). National Geodetic Survey Antenna Calibration, Available online: https://geodesy.noaa.gov/ANTCAL/.
35. Takasu, T., and Yasuda, A. (2009, January 4–6). Development of the low-cost RTK-GPS receiver with an open-source program package RTKLIB. Proceedings of the International Symposium on GPS/GNSS, Jeju, Republic of Korea.
36. TEQC: The multi-purpose toolkit for GPS/GLONASS data10.1007/PL00012778 ↗