journal article·2024-04-13Open access

Training Tennis through Induced Variability and Specific Practice: Effects on Performance in the Forehand Approach Shot

Vinicius Oliveira, Ruperto Menayo, Juan Pedro Fuentes-García

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 8

Abstract

(1) Background: Learning and training in variable conditions favors adapting to unstable or changing environments. The aim of this study was to test the effect of variable practice on the accuracy of the forehand net approach shot in tennis. (2) Methods: Thirty (N = 30) first-class national players (12.9 ± 1.1 years old) participated, divided into three groups: (i) induced variability training (n = 10) (varying court surfaces and balls), (ii) specific training (n = 10), and (iii) usual training (control group) (n = 10). All groups trained for a month: 12 sessions of 20 min (3 per week). The accuracy of the shots was analyzed through a 2D capture and digitization process of the ball bounce on the court. (3) Results: The variability group presented better accuracy values after the period without practice than the stable training group (p = 0.041; ES = 0.51). (4) Conclusions: The application of variability in the game conditions during tennis training seems to have a favorable effect on the retention of accuracy in the forehand down-the-line approach to the net.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Sports Performance and Training · Sports injuries and prevention · Sports Dynamics and Biomechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Unity Tennis S.C, 07181 Magaluf, Spain

Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Extremadura, 06006 Badajoz, Spain

Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Extremadura, 10003 Cáceres, Spain

Funding

European Regional Development Fund

References (28)

Show source-provided references
1. Changing up the Routine: Intervention-Induced Variability in Motor Learning10.1097/JES.0b013e318259beb5 ↗
2. Wade, M.G., and Whiting, H.T. (1986). Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control, Martinus Nijhoff.10.1007/978-94-009-4460-2 ↗
3. Davids, K., Button, C., and Bennett, S. (2008). Dynamics of Skill Acquisition: A Constraints-Led Approach, Human Kinetics.
4. Relationship Between Motor Variability, Accuracy, and ball speed in the tennis serve10.2478/v10078-012-0043-3 ↗
5. The variability of the serve toss in tennis under the influence of artificial crosswind
6. Comparison of constant and variable practice conditions on free-throw shooting10.2466/pms.2002.94.3c.1113 ↗
7. Differential learning as a key training approach to improve creative and tactical behavior in soccer10.1080/02701367.2017.1412063 ↗
8. Repetition without repetition: Challenges in understanding behavioral flexibility in motor skill10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02018 ↗
9. Apidogo, J.B., Ammar, A., Salem, A., Burdack, J., and Schöllhorn, W.I. (2023). Resonance Effects in Variable Practice for Handball, Basketball, and Volleyball Skills: A Study on Contextual Interference and Differential Learning. Sports, 12.10.3390/sports12010005 ↗
10. Effects of contextual interference and differential learning on performance and mental representations in a golf putting task10.1002/ejsc.12079 ↗
11. Variable training: Effects on velocity and accuracy in the tennis serve10.1080/02640414.2014.891290 ↗
12. Induced variability during the tennis service practice affect the performance of every tennis player individually and specifically
13. Tennis ball diameter: The effect on performance and the concurrent physiological responses10.1080/02640410410001730052 ↗
14. Girard, O., and Millet, G.P. (2004, January 14). Effects of the ground surface on the physiological and technical responses in young tennis players. Proceedings of the Eighth International Table Tennis Federation Sports Science Congress and the Third World Congress of Science and Racket Sports, London, UK.
15. Effect of Modification Rules in Competition on Technical–Tactical Action in Young Tennis Players (Under-10)10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02789 ↗
16. Variable practice in learning the forehand drive in tennis10.2466/pms.101.2.531-545 ↗
17. (2024, March 12). International Tennis Federation—ITF. Rules and Regulations. Approved Tennis Balls and Classified Court Surfaces. Available online: https://www.itftennis.com/en/about-us/governance/rules-and-regulations/.
18. Differences in ball speed and accuracy of tennis groundstrokes between elite and high-performance players10.1080/17461391.2011.566363 ↗
19. (2024, March 04). Kinovea. Available online: https://www.kinovea.org/.
20. Instructions emphasizing velocity, accuracy, or both in performance and kinematics of overarm throwing by experienced team handball players10.2466/pms.2003.97.3.731 ↗
21. On-court endurance and performance testing in competitive male tennis players10.1519/JSC.0b013e3182955dad ↗
22. Rea, L.M., and Parker, R.A. (1992). Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A Comprehensive Guide, Jossey-Bass Publishers.
23. King, B.M., and Minium, E.W. (2008). Statistical Reasoning in the Behavioral Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. [5th ed.].
24. Effects of two training protocols on the forehand drive perfomance in tennis10.1519/JSC.0b013e31825c3290 ↗
25. Effects of 4 Weeks of Variability Training on Forehand Approach Precision and Velocity in Recreational Tennis Players10.1123/mc.2022-0128 ↗
26. Quantifying contextual interference and its effect on skill transfer in skilled youth tennis players10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01931 ↗
27. Sleep affects the motor memory of basketball shooting skills in young amateurs10.1016/j.jocn.2021.11.016 ↗
28. The physiological demands of hitting and running in tennis on different surfaces10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181e8745f ↗