A Semantically Aware Multi-View 3D Reconstruction Method for Urban Applications
Source abstract
Abstract
The task of 3D reconstruction of urban targets holds pivotal importance for various applications, including autonomous driving, digital twin technology, and urban planning and development. The intricate nature of urban landscapes presents substantial challenges in attaining 3D reconstructions with high precision. In this paper, we propose a semantically aware multi-view 3D reconstruction method for urban applications which incorporates semantic information into the technical 3D reconstruction. Our research primarily focuses on two major components: sparse reconstruction and dense reconstruction. For the sparse reconstruction process, we present a semantic consistency-based error filtering approach for feature matching. To address the challenge of errors introduced by the presence of numerous dynamic objects in an urban scene, which affects the Structure-from-Motion (SfM) process, we propose a computation strategy based on dynamic–static separation to effectively eliminate mismatches. For the dense reconstruction process, we present a semantic-based Semi-Global Matching (sSGM) method. This method leverages semantic consistency to assess depth continuity, thereby enhancing the cost function during depth estimation. The improved sSGM method not only significantly enhances the accuracy of reconstructing the edges of the targets but also yields a dense point cloud containing semantic information. Through validation using architectural datasets, the proposed method was found to increase the reconstruction accuracy by 32.79% compared to the original SGM, and by 63.06% compared to the PatchMatch method. Therefore, the proposed reconstruction method holds significant potential in urban applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage · Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Infrared System Detection and Imaging Technologies, Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200083, China
Funding
Shanghai Institute of Technical Physics
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. Zhang, H., Venkatramani, S., Paz, D., Li, Q., Xiang, H., and Christensen, H.I. (2023). Probabilistic Semantic Mapping for Autonomous Driving in Urban Environments. Sensors, 23.10.3390/s23146504 ↗
2. Koulalis, I., Dourvas, N., Triantafyllidis, T., Ioannidis, K., Vrochidis, S., and Kompatsiaris, I. (2022, January 14–16). A survey for image based methods in construction: From images to digital twins. Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Content-Based Multimedia Indexing, Graz, Austria.10.1145/3549555.3549594 ↗
3. Wang, X., Bao, C., Sun, Z., and Wang, X. (2022, January 20–22). Research on the application of digital twin in aerospace manufacturing based on 3D point cloud. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Electronics and Devices, Computational Science (ICEDCS), Marseille, France.10.1109/ICEDCS57360.2022.00076 ↗
4. De Marco, R., and Galasso, F. (2023). Defensive Architecture of the Mediterranean: Vol. XV, Pisa University Press.
5. Muenster, S. (2022). Digital 3D Technologies for Humanities Research and Education: An Overview. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12052426 ↗
6. Ren, R., Fu, H., Xue, H., Sun, Z., Ding, K., and Wang, P. (2021). Towards a Fully Automated 3D Reconstruction System Based on LiDAR and GNSS in Challenging Scenarios. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13101981 ↗
7. DBSCAN-based point cloud extraction for Tomographic synthetic aperture radar (TomoSAR) three-dimensional (3D) building reconstruction10.1080/01431161.2020.1851062 ↗
8. Mele, A., Vitiello, A., Bonano, M., Miano, A., Lanari, R., Acampora, G., and Prota, A. (2022). On the joint exploitation of satellite DInSAR measurements and DBSCAN-Based techniques for preliminary identification and ranking of critical constructions in a built environment. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14081872 ↗
9. Jung, S., Lee, Y.-S., Lee, Y., and Lee, K. (2022). 3D Reconstruction Using 3D Registration-Based ToF-Stereo Fusion. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22218369 ↗
10. A review of 3D reconstruction from high-resolution urban satellite images10.1080/01431161.2023.2169844 ↗
11. 3d reconstruction using deep learning: A survey10.4310/CIS.2020.v20.n4.a1 ↗
12. Deep learning-based 3D reconstruction: A survey10.1007/s10462-023-10399-2 ↗
13. Murtiyoso, A., Pellis, E., Grussenmeyer, P., Landes, T., and Masiero, A. (2022). Towards semantic photogrammetry: Generating semantically rich point clouds from architectural close-range photogrammetry. Sensors, 22.10.3390/s22030966 ↗
14. Li, X., Liu, S., Kim, K., De Mello, S., Jampani, V., Yang, M.-H., and Kautz, J. (2020, January 23–28). Self-supervised single-view 3d reconstruction via semantic consistency. Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-58568-6_40 ↗
15. Hou, J., Dai, A., and Nießner, M. (2019, January 15–20). 3d-sis: 3D semantic instance segmentation of rgb-d scans. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Long Beach, CA, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2019.00455 ↗
16. 3D Semantic Segmentation of Aerial Photogrammetry Models Based on Orthographic Projection10.1109/TCSVT.2023.3273224 ↗
17. A Real-Time Online Learning Framework for Joint 3D Reconstruction and Semantic Segmentation of Indoor Scenes10.1109/LRA.2021.3138539 ↗
18. Croce, V., Caroti, G., De Luca, L., Jacquot, K., Piemonte, A., and Véron, P. (2021). From the semantic point cloud to heritage-building information modeling: A semiautomatic approach exploiting machine learning. Remote Sens., 13.10.3390/rs13030461 ↗
19. Li, L., Tang, L., Zhu, H., Zhang, H., Yang, F., and Qin, W. (2017). Semantic 3D modeling based on CityGML for ancient Chinese-style architectural roofs of digital heritage. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf., 6.10.3390/ijgi6050132 ↗
20. Semantics-aided 3D change detection on construction sites using UAV-based photogrammetric point clouds10.1016/j.autcon.2021.104057 ↗
21. Wang, T., Wang, Q., Ai, H., and Zhang, L. (2022). Semantics-and-Primitives-Guided Indoor 3D Reconstruction from Point Clouds. Remote Sens., 14.10.3390/rs14194820 ↗
22. Dense Semantic 3D Reconstruction10.1109/TPAMI.2016.2613051 ↗
23. Blaha, M., Vogel, C., Richard, A., Wegner, J.D., Pock, T., and Schindler, K. (2016, January 27–30). Large-scale semantic 3d reconstruction: An adaptive multi-resolution model for multi-class volumetric labeling. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.346 ↗
24. Xu, W., Zeng, Y., and Yin, C. (2023). 3D City Reconstruction: A Novel Method for Semantic Segmentation and Building Monomer Construction Using Oblique Photography. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13158795 ↗
25. Zhou, B., Zhao, H., Puig, X., Fidler, S., Barriuso, A., and Torralba, A. (2017, January 21–26). Scene parsing through ade20k dataset. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Honolulu, HI, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2017.544 ↗
26. Reddy, N.D., Singhal, P., Chari, V., and Krishna, K.M. (October, January 28). Dynamic body vslam with semantic constraints. Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Hamburg, Germany.10.1109/IROS.2015.7353626 ↗
27. Moulon, P., Monasse, P., Perrot, R., and Marlet, R. (2016, January 4). OpenMVG: Open multiple view geometry. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Reproducible Research in Pattern Recognition, Cancún, Mexico.10.1007/978-3-319-56414-2_5 ↗
28. Cernea, D. (2023, December 28). OpenMVS: Multi-View Stereo Reconstruction Library. Available online: https://github.com/cdcseacave/openMVS.
29. Group, M.V.R. (2023, December 28). 3D Reconstruction Dataset. Available online: http://vision.ia.ac.cn/data.
30. Cordts, M., Omran, M., Ramos, S., Rehfeld, T., Enzweiler, M., Benenson, R., Franke, U., Roth, S., and Schiele, B. (2016, January 27–30). The cityscapes dataset for semantic urban scene understanding. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.350 ↗
31. Schönberger, J.L., and Frahm, J.M. (2016, January 27–30). Structure-from-Motion Revisited. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), Las Vegas, NV, USA.10.1109/CVPR.2016.445 ↗
32. Stereo Processing by Semiglobal Matching and Mutual Information10.1109/TPAMI.2007.1166 ↗
33. A Quasi-Dense Matching Approach and its Calibration Application with Internet Photos10.1109/TCYB.2014.2326255 ↗
34. Contributors, M. (2023, December 28). MMSegmentation: Openmmlab Semantic Segmentation Toolbox and Benchmark. Available online: https://github.com/open-mmlab/mmsegmentation.
35. Chen, L.-C., Zhu, Y., Papandreou, G., Schroff, F., and Adam, H. (2018, January 8–14). Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV), Munich, Germany.10.1007/978-3-030-01234-2_49 ↗
36. Yuan, Y., Chen, X., and Wang, J. (2020, January 23–28). Object-contextual representations for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK.10.1007/978-3-030-58539-6_11 ↗
37. Li, P., Wang, M., Zhou, D., and Lei, W. (2020, January 22–24). A pose measurement method of a non-cooperative spacecraft based on point cloud feature. Proceedings of the 2020 Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC), Hefei, China.10.1109/CCDC49329.2020.9164165 ↗
38. Per-pixel classification is not all you need for semantic segmentation
39. Cheng, B., Misra, I., Schwing, A.G., Kirillov, A., and Girdhar, R. (2022, January 18–24). Masked-attention mask transformer for universal image segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, New Orleans, LA, USA.10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00135 ↗