journal article·2024-03-04Open access

Influence of Implant Number on Peri-Implant and Posterior Edentulous Area Strains in Mandibular Overdentures Retained by the New Ti–Zr (Roxolid®) Mini-Implants as Single-Units: In Vitro Study

Dario Puljic, Asja Celebic, Ines Kovacic, Nikola Petricevic

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

The new Ti–Zr (Roxolid®) mini-implants have not yet been fully researched. We analyzed peri-implant and posterior edentulous area microstrains during mandibular overdenture (OD) loading at different sites with different extents of forces when one-, two-, three-, or four- mini dental implants (MDIs) as single-units supported the respective ODs. The models were designed from cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of an appropriate patient with narrow ridges. The mucosal thickness was 2 mm. Strain gauges were bonded on the vestibular and oral peri-implant sites, and in the distal edentulous area under the saddles. The loads were applied posteriorly bilaterally and unilaterally with 50, 100 and 150 N forces, and anteriorly with 50 and 100 N forces. Each loading was repeated 15 times. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, boxplots and the MANOVA. Higher forces induced higher peri-implant microstrains, as well as unilateral loadings, especially on the loaded side, in all models except the one-MDI model where anterior loads (100 N) elicited the highest peri-implant microstrain (1719.35 ± 76.0). The highest microstrains during unilateral posterior loading (right side) with 150 N force were registered from the right MDI in the two-MDI model (1836.64 ± 63.0). High microstrains were also recorded on the left side (1444.48 ± 54.6). By increasing the number of implants, peri-implant microstrains and those in the edentulous area decreased. In the three- and four-MDI models, higher microstrains were found in the posterior than in the anterior MDIs under posterior loadings. None of the recorded microstrains exceeded bone reparatory mechanisms, although precaution and additional research should be provided when only one or two MDIs support ODs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · Dental materials and restorations

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Removable Prosthodontics, University of Zagreb School of Dental Medicine, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia

References (62)

Show source-provided references
1. Mini-Implants and Narrow Diameter Implants as Mandibular Overdenture Retainers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes10.1111/joor.12585 ↗
2. Adaptation to New Dentures and 5 Years of Clinical Use: A Comparison between Complete Denture and Mini-Implant Mandibular Overdenture Patients Based on Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL) and Orofacial Esthetics10.15644/asc56/2/4 ↗
3. Comparison of Three Prosthodontic Treatment Modalities for Patients with Periodontally Compromised Anterior Mandibular Teeth: A 2-Year Follow-up Study10.15644/asc53/1/1 ↗
4. The Clinical and Radiographic Outcome of Immediately Loaded Mini Implants Supporting a Mandibular Overdenture. A 3-Year Prospective Study: CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOME OF MINI IMPLANTS10.1111/j.1365-2842.2011.02213.x ↗
5. A Cohort Study on Short Mini-implants for Mandibular Overdentures Compared to Those of Standard Length10.1111/clr.13542 ↗
6. Mandibular Implant-Supported Fixed Complete Dental Prostheses on Implants with Ultrashort and Standard Length: A Pilot Treatment10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.04.013 ↗
7. A Prospective Cohort Study on Survival and Success of One-Piece Mini-Implants with Associated Changes in Oral Function: Five-Year Outcomes10.1111/clr.13444 ↗
8. AlHelal, A.A. (2021). Application of Immediate Loaded Mini Dental Implants for Retaining Mandibular Overdenture Prosthesis in Edentulous Patients: A Systematic Review. Appl. Sci., 11.10.3390/app112210724 ↗
9. Narrow Implants and Overdentures in the Total Rehabilitation of Atrophic Edentulous Jaws: Review of Clinical Aspects with Meta-Analysis10.3390/prosthesis6010003 ↗
10. Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Different Types of Mandibular Implant Overdentures in Function Longer Than 3 Years10.11607/ijp.4457 ↗
11. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular Two-Implant Overdentures as First Choice Standard of Care for Edentulous Patients10.1111/j.1741-2358.2002.00003.x ↗
12. Group 1 ITI Consensus Report: The Influence of Implant Length and Design and Medications on Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes10.1111/clr.13342 ↗
13. Clinical Outcome of Removable Prostheses Supported by Mini Dental Implants. A Systematic Review10.1080/00016357.2018.1499958 ↗
14. Treatment Outcomes for Mandibular Mini-Implant–Retained Overdentures: A Systematic Review10.11607/ijp.4929 ↗
15. Celebic, A., Kovacic, I., Petricevic, N., Alhajj, M.N., Topic, J., Junakovic, L., and Persic-Kirsic, S. (2023). Clinical Outcomes of Three versus Four Mini-Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture: A 5-Year Randomized Clinical Trial. Medicina, 60.10.3390/medicina60010017 ↗
16. Immediate versus Delayed Loading of Strategic Mini-Implants under Existing Removable Partial Dentures: Patient Satisfaction in a Multi-Center Randomized Clinical Trial10.1007/s00784-020-03360-y ↗
17. Survival and Stability of Strategic Mini-Implants with Immediate or Delayed Loading under Removable Partial Dentures: A 3-Year Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial10.1007/s00784-022-04805-2 ↗
18. Celebic, A., Kovacic, I., Petricevic, N., Puljic, D., Popovac, A., and Kirsic, S.P. (2023). Mini-Implants Retaining Removable Partial Dentures in Subjects without Posterior Teeth: A 5-Year Prospective Study Comparing the Maxilla and the Mandible. Medicina, 59.10.3390/medicina59020237 ↗
19. Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Two Mini-Implants: A Seven-Year Retention and Satisfaction Study10.1111/jopr.12373 ↗
20. Immediate Loading of Mandibular Overdentures Retained by Two Mini-Implants: A Case Series Preliminary Report10.11607/ijp.5589 ↗
21. Effect of Splinting Mini-Implants on Marginal Bone Loss: A Biomechanical Model and Clinical Randomized Study with Mandibular Overdentures
22. Influence of Marginal Bone Resorption on Two Mini Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdenture: An in Vitro Study10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.55 ↗
23. Clinical Performance of Narrow-Diameter Titanium–Zirconium Implants in Immediately Loaded Fixed Full-Arch Prostheses: A 2-Year Clinical Study10.1186/s40729-021-00312-3 ↗
24. Clinical Performance of Narrow-Diameter Titanium-Zirconium Implants: A Systematic Review10.1097/ID.0000000000000557 ↗
25. Clinical Outcomes of Titanium-Zirconium Alloy Narrow-Diameter Implants for Single-Crown Restorations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis10.1016/j.bjoms.2023.05.005 ↗
26. Implant Survival/Success and Peri-Implant Outcomes of Titanium-Zirconium Mini Implants for Mandibular Overdentures: Results from a 1-Year Randomized Clinical Trial10.1111/clr.14102 ↗
27. A Comparison of Peri-Implant Strain Generated by Different Types of Implant Supported Prostheses10.4103/0972-4052.203195 ↗
28. Wang, P.-S., Tsai, M.-H., Wu, Y.-L., Chen, H.-S., Lei, Y.-N., and Wu, A.Y.-J. (2023). Biomechanical Analysis of Titanium Dental Implants in the All-on-4 Treatment with Different Implant–Abutment Connections: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study. J. Funct. Biomater., 14.10.3390/jfb14100515 ↗
29. Probing Combinational Influence of Design Variables on Bone Biomechanical Response around Dental Implant-supported Fixed Prosthesis10.1002/jbm.b.35081 ↗
30. Sample Size of 12 per Group Rule of Thumb for a Pilot Study10.1002/pst.185 ↗
31. Basic Concepts for Sample Size Calculation: Critical Step for Any Clinical Trials!10.4103/1658-354X.174918 ↗
32. Timing of Loading and Effect of Micromotion on Bone-Dental Implant Interface: Review of Experimental Literature10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199822)43:2<192::AID-JBM14>3.0.CO;2-K ↗
33. A 2003 Update of Bone Physiology and Wolff’s Law for Clinicians
34. Structure, Mechanical Properties, and Grindability of Dental Ti-Zr Alloys10.1007/s10856-008-3454-x ↗
35. Brizuela, A., Herrero-Climent, M., Rios-Carrasco, E., Rios-Santos, J., Pérez, R., Manero, J., and Gil Mur, J. (2019). Influence of the Elastic Modulus on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants. Materials, 12.10.3390/ma12060980 ↗
36. Brizuela-Velasco, A., Pérez-Pevida, E., Jiménez-Garrudo, A., Gil-Mur, F.J., Manero, J.M., Punset-Fuste, M., Chávarri-Prado, D., Diéguez-Pereira, M., and Monticelli, F. (2017). Mechanical Characterisation and Biomechanical and Biological Behaviours of Ti-Zr Binary-Alloy Dental Implants. Biomed. Res. Int., 2017.10.1155/2017/2785863 ↗
37. Number and Location of Mini-Implants Retaining a Mandibular Overdenture to Resist Lateral Forces: A Preliminary In Vitro Study10.11607/ijp.4995 ↗
38. Effects of Different Numbers of Mini-Dental Implants on Alveolar Ridge Strain Distribution under Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures10.1016/j.jpor.2017.05.002 ↗
39. Alshenaiber, R., Silikas, N., and Barclay, C. (2022). Does the Length of Mini Dental Implants Affect Their Resistance to Failure by Overloading?. Dent. J., 10.10.3390/dj10070117 ↗
40. Numerical Investigation of Complete Mandibular Dentures Stabilized by Conventional or Mini Implants in Patient Individual Models
41. A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis for Overdenture Attachments Supported by Teeth and/or Mini Dental Implants10.1111/j.1532-849X.2012.00883.x ↗
42. Assessments of Jaw Bone Density at Implant Sites Using 3D Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
43. Strains around Distally Inclined Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdentures with Locator Attachments: An In Vitro Study10.4047/jap.2016.8.2.116 ↗
44. Can Bite-Force Measurement Play a Role in Dental Treatment Planning, Clinical Trials, and Survival Outcomes? A Literature Review and Clinical Recommendations
45. Mandibular Implant-supported Overdentures and Oral Function10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.01915.x ↗
46. Bite Force Evaluation in Complete Denture Wearer with Different Denture Base Materials: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_2_18 ↗
47. Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Overdenture Retained by Two Standard Implants or 2 Mini Implants: A 3-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.09.015 ↗
48. Stress Distribution Analysis of Novel Dental Mini-Implant Designs to Support Overdenture Prosthesis10.1563/aaid-joi-D-19-00354 ↗
49. Biomechanical Behavior of 2-Implant- and Single-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures with Conventional or Mini Implants10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.12.012 ↗
50. Finite Element Analysis of Different Loading Conditions for Implant-Supported Overdentures Supported by Conventional or Mini Implants10.1080/10255842.2017.1302432 ↗
51. Mehboob, H., Ouldyerou, A., and Ijaz, M.F. (2023). Biomechanical Investigation of Patient-Specific Porous Dental Implants: A Finite Element Study. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13127097 ↗
52. Schulz, A., Klär, V., Grobecker-Karl, T., and Karl, M. (2023). Biomechanical Rationale for a Novel Implant Design Reducing Stress on Buccal Bone. Appl. Sci., 13.10.3390/app13010666 ↗
53. Teodorescu, C., Preoteasa, E., Preoteasa, C.T., Murariu-Măgureanu, C., and Teodorescu, I.M. (2022). The Biomechanical Impact of Loss of an Implant in the Treatment with Mandibular Overdentures on Four Nonsplinted Mini Dental Implants: A Finite Element Analysis. Materials, 15.10.3390/ma15238662 ↗
54. Lung, H., Hsu, J.-T., Wu, A.Y.-J., and Huang, H.-L. (2019). Biomechanical Effects of Diameters of Implant Body and Implant Platform in Bone Strain around an Immediately Loaded Dental Implant with Platform Switching Concept. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9101998 ↗
55. The Influence of Implant Body and Thread Design of Mini Dental Implants on the Loading of Surrounding Bone: A Finite Element Analysis10.1515/bmt-2016-0002 ↗
56. Fracture Resistance of Commonly Used Self-Drilling Orthodontic Mini-Implants10.2319/112213-860.1 ↗
57. Failure Load and Stress Analysis of Orthodontic Miniscrews with Different Transmucosal Collar Diameter10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.07.032 ↗
58. Influence of Adhesive on Optical Fiber-Based Strain Measurements on Printed Circuit Boards10.1007/s10854-023-10017-5 ↗
59. Binary Titanium Alloys as Dental Implant Materials—A Review10.1093/rb/rbx027 ↗
60. Is Titanium–Zirconium Alloy a Better Alternative to Pure Titanium for Oral Implant? Composition, Mechanical Properties, and Microstructure Analysis10.1016/j.sdentj.2020.08.009 ↗
61. Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Ti–15Zr Alloy Used as Dental Implant Material10.1016/j.jmbbm.2016.05.008 ↗
62. A Review in Titanium-Zirconium Binary Alloy for Use in Dental Implants: Is There an Ideal Ti-Zr Composing Ratio?10.1016/j.jdsr.2023.01.002 ↗