journal article·2024-03-04Open access

3D Ultrasound Mosaic of the Whole Shoulder: A Feasibility Study

Ahmed Sewify, Maria Antico, Marian Steffens, Jacqueline Roots, Ashish Gupta, Kenneth Cutbush, Peter Pivonka, Davide Fontanarosa

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 5

Abstract

A protocol is proposed to acquire a tomographic ultrasound (US) scan of the musculoskeletal (MSK) anatomy in the rotator cuff region. Current clinical US imaging techniques are hindered by occlusions and a narrow field of view and require expert acquisition and interpretation. There is limited literature on 3D US image registration of the shoulder or volumetric reconstruction of the full shoulder complex. We believe that a clinically accurate US volume reconstruction of the entire shoulder can aid in pre-operative surgical planning and reduce the complexity of US interpretation. The protocol was used in generating data for deep learning model training to automatically register US mosaics in real-time. An in vivo 3D US tomographic reconstruction of the entire rotator cuff region was produced by registering 53 sequential 3D US volumes acquired by an MSK sonographer. Anatomical surface thicknesses and distances in the US mosaic were compared to their corresponding MRI measurements as the ground truth. The humeral head surface was marginally thicker in the reconstructed US mosaic than its original thickness observed in a single US volume by 0.65 mm. The humeral head diameter and acromiohumeral distance (ACHD) matched with their measured MRI distances with a reconstruction error of 0 mm and 1.2 mm, respectively. Furthermore, the demonstration of 20 relevant MSK structures was independently graded between 1 and 5 by two sonographers, with higher grades indicating poorer demonstration. The average demonstration grade for each anatomy was as follows: bones = 2, muscles = 3, tendons = 3, ligaments = 4–5 and labrum = 4–5. There was a substantial agreement between sonographers (Cohen’s Weighted kappa of 0.71) on the demonstration of the structures, and they both independently deemed the mosaic clinically acceptable for the visualisation of the bony anatomy. Ligaments and the labrum were poorly observed due to anatomy size, location and inaccessibility in a static scan, and artefact build-up from the registration and compounding approaches.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries · Ultrasound in Clinical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Centre for Biomedical Technologies (CBT), Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Australian e-Health Research Centre, The Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), 296 Herston Rd., Herston, QLD 4029, Australia

Queensland Unit for Advanced Shoulder Research (QUASR), Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Greenslopes Private Hospital, Newdegate St., Greenslopes, QLD 4120, Australia

School of Medicine, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia

School of Mechanical Medical and Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, 2 George St., Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia

Funding

Australian Government: ARC Industrial Transformation Training Centre (ITTC) for Joint Biomechanics

References (35)

Show source-provided references
1. An Effective Non-rigid Registration Approach for Ultrasound Image Based On “Demons” Algorithm10.1007/s10278-012-9532-0 ↗
2. Kompella, G., Singarayan, J., Antico, M., Sasazawa, F., Yu, T., Ram, K., Pandey, A.K., Fontanarosa, D., and Sivaprakasam, M. (2022). Automatic 3D MRI-Ultrasound Registration for Image Guided Arthroscopy. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12115488 ↗
3. Emma, H., Davide, F., Saskia, C., and Frank, V. (2021). Institute of Physics Modern Applications of 3D/4D Ultrasound Imaging in Radiotherapy, IOP Publishing.
4. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/42093.
5. Machine Learning for Medical Ultrasound: Status, Methods, and Future Opportunities10.1007/s00261-018-1517-0 ↗
6. Advanced Ultrasound Technologies for Diagnosis and Therapy10.2967/jnumed.117.200030 ↗
7. Bushberg, J.T. (2002). The Essential Physics of Medical Imaging, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
8. Shoulder ultrasound: What you need to know10.4103/0971-3026.111481 ↗
9. Shoulder US: Anatomy, Technique, and Scanning Pitfalls10.1148/radiol.11101082 ↗
10. Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Technical Guidelines I. Shoulder
11. Farina, R., and Sparano, A. (2012). Errors in Radiology, Springer.
12. Duric, N., and Littrup, P. (2017). Breast Imaging, InTech Open.
13. Work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WRMSD) among registered diagnostic medical sonographers and vascular technologists: A representative sample10.1177/8756479309351748 ↗
14. Automated, machine learning-based, 3D echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular mass10.1111/echo.14234 ↗
15. Sources of error in emergency ultrasonography10.1186/2036-7902-5-S1-S1 ↗
16. Three-dimensional extended field-of-view ultrasound10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2005.11.003 ↗
17. Spatial compounding of large sets of 3D echocardiography images
18. 4D Ultrasound-Based Knee Joint Atlas for Robotic Knee Arthroscopy: A Feasibility Study10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3014999 ↗
19. Zettinig, O., Fuerst, B., Kojcev, R., Esposito, M., Salehi, M., Wein, W., Rackerseder, J., Sinibaldi, E., Frisch, B., and Navab, N. (2016, January 16–21). Toward real-time 3D ultrasound registration-based visual servoing for interventional navigation. Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Stockholm, Sweden.10.1109/ICRA.2016.7487226 ↗
20. Non-iterative partial view 3D ultrasound to CT registration in ultrasound-guided computer-assisted orthopedic surgery10.1007/s11548-012-0747-9 ↗
21. Bone registration with 3D CT and ultrasound data sets10.1016/S0531-5131(03)00396-0 ↗
22. Stolka, P.J., Henrich, D., Tretbar, S.H., and Federspil, P.A. (2008, January 20–25). First 3D ultrasound scanning, planning, and execution of CT-free milling interventions with a surgical robot. Proceedings of the 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada.10.1109/IEMBS.2008.4650485 ↗
23. Automatic Registration for Navigation at the Anterior and Lateral Skull Base10.1177/0003489419849086 ↗
24. Goos, G., Hartmanis, J., Van, J., Board, L.E., Hutchison, D., Kanade, T., Kittler, J., Kleinberg, J.M., Kobsa, A., and Mattern, F. (2012, January 1–5). LNCS 7510-Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Proceedings of the MICCAI 2012: 15th International Conference, Nice, France.
25. Real-time image-based rigid registration of three-dimensional ultrasound10.1016/j.media.2011.10.004 ↗
26. Figl, M., Hoffmann, R., Kaar, M., and Hummel, J. (2019). Deformable registration of 3D ultrasound volumes using automatic landmark generation. PLoS ONE, 14.10.1371/journal.pone.0213004 ↗
27. Elastic registration of 3D ultrasound images
28. Zikic, D., Wein, W., Khamene, A., Clevert, D.A., and Navab, N. (2006, January 1–6). Fast Deformable Registration of 3D-Ultrasound Data Using a Variational Approach. Lect Notes Comput Sci (including Subser Lect Notes Artif Intell Lect Notes Bioinformatics). Proceedings of the Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention—MICCAI, Copenhagen, Denmark. Available online: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/11866565_112.10.1007/11866565_112 ↗
29. The effects of anatomical errors on shoulder kinematics computed using multi-body models10.1007/s10237-022-01606-0 ↗
30. Ultrasound registration: A review10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.12.006 ↗
31. JASP Team (2023, September 25). Computer Program.2023. JASP 0.18. Available online: https://jasp-stats.org/.
32. Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: Measures of agreement10.4103/picr.PICR_123_17 ↗
33. McNally, E.G. (2014). Practical Musculoskeletal Ultrasound, Elsevier Health Sciences. [2nd ed.].
34. Case report 72510.1007/BF00242137 ↗
35. Ochsner Clinical School, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville (2021). Anatomy, Shoulder and Upper Limb, Acromioclavicular Joint, StatPearls Publishing. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK499858/#!po=15.6250.