Development of photocatalysts based on TiO 2 films with embedded Ag nanoparticles
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this work, the synthesis, characterization, and study of the photocatalytic activity of polycrystalline TiO 2 coatings with embedded Ag nanoparticles (Ag‐TiO 2 ) were presented. In particular, the TiO 2 and Ag‐TiO 2 coatings were developed using a simple and improved sol‐gel technique. Very stable TiO 2 sols containing Ag nanoparticles were prepared and deposited by dip‐coating process onto glass substrates obtaining homogeneous and transparent thin films. The well‐distribution of silver nanoparticles into the TiO 2 sol allows TiO 2 coatings with Ag nanoparticles distributed throughout the volume of the material to be obtained. A significant improvement of the photocatalytic activity was observed for the Ag‐TiO 2 coatings. The photocatalytic mechanism implicated in the dye degradation (methyl orange) by hydroxyl (•OH) and superoxide (•O 2 – ) radicals was studied using several scavengers. Thus, it is concluded that the addition of Ag nanoparticles does not modify the mechanisms involved in the dye degradation, evidencing the good stability of the photocatalyst.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: TiO2 Photocatalysis and Solar Cells · Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques · Copper-based nanomaterials and applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratorio de Materiales Cerámicos Instituto de Física Rosario‐Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas‐Universidad Nacional de Rosario Rosario Argentina
Instituto de Cerámica y Vidrio (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas) Madrid España
References (63)
Show source-provided references
1. Rafique M · 2020
2. 10.1016/j.cattod.2019.08.00910.1016/j.cattod.2019.08.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.eti.2021.10153710.1016/j.eti.2021.101537 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jece.2019.10328310.1016/j.jece.2019.103283 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.cap.2020.04.00610.1016/j.cap.2020.04.006 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.01.01210.1016/j.jphotochem.2017.01.012 ↗
7. Semiconductor nanomaterials for the detoxification of dyes in real wastewater under visible‐light photocatalysis
8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-813926-4.00028-810.1016/B978-0-12-813926-4.00028-8 ↗
9. 10.3390/catal902012210.3390/catal9020122 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10421110.1016/j.jece.2020.104211 ↗
11. 10.1007/s10904-021-02076-010.1007/s10904-021-02076-0 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.05310.1016/j.msec.2014.07.053 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.12300110.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123001 ↗
14. 10.1021/acsami.9b2205610.1021/acsami.9b22056 ↗
15. 10.1080/17518253.2018.144032410.1080/17518253.2018.1440324 ↗
16. 10.1007/s10904-021-01914-510.1007/s10904-021-01914-5 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14489610.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144896 ↗
18. 10.1039/C9NR01260E10.1039/C9NR01260E ↗
19. Highly photodegradation of organic dye pollutant RhB using TiO2‐modified reduced graphene oxide
20. 10.3934/matersci.2019.2.17410.3934/matersci.2019.2.174 ↗
21. Seshan K · 2012
22. Kato K · 2005
23. On coating techniques for surface protection: a review
24. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.11865410.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118654 ↗
25. 10.3390/coatings910061310.3390/coatings9100613 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10371810.1016/j.jece.2020.103718 ↗
27. 10.1007/s10854-020-03288-910.1007/s10854-020-03288-9 ↗
28. 10.1007/s11356-021-14996-y10.1007/s11356-021-14996-y ↗
29. 10.1016/j.rinp.2021.10420510.1016/j.rinp.2021.104205 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.12450910.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.124509 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.10985610.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109856 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.13018010.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130180 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10971-015-3765-610.1007/s10971-015-3765-6 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.12.06110.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.12.061 ↗
35. 10.1002/pssb.20155200710.1002/pssb.201552007 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.243241010.1063/1.2432410 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.11.00910.1016/j.jphotochem.2015.11.009 ↗
38. 10.14233/ajchem.2013.1353910.14233/ajchem.2013.13539 ↗
39. 10.1039/C7QI00638A10.1039/C7QI00638A ↗
40. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.05.00510.1016/j.matchemphys.2005.05.005 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10971-015-3935-610.1007/s10971-015-3935-6 ↗
42. 10.1016/0022-4596(82)90006-810.1016/0022-4596(82)90006-8 ↗
43. 10.1002/jrs.125026011010.1002/jrs.1250260110 ↗
44. 10.1063/1.162928010.1063/1.1629280 ↗
45. 10.1039/C8TC01168K10.1039/C8TC01168K ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.32210.1016/j.jallcom.2019.01.322 ↗
47. 10.1111/ijac.1343910.1111/ijac.13439 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.02410.1016/j.apcatb.2011.09.024 ↗
49. Super‐Hydrophilic and photocatalytic properties of Ag‐TiO2 thin films prepared by sol‐gel technique
50. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.14510.1016/j.apsusc.2016.08.145 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.08.00310.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.08.003 ↗
52. 10.1088/2043-6254/ab088210.1088/2043-6254/ab0882 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.05210.1016/j.envpol.2019.02.052 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.01010.1016/j.apcatb.2003.11.010 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.cej.2009.02.02610.1016/j.cej.2009.02.026 ↗
56. 10.1021/jp209661d10.1021/jp209661d ↗
57. 10.1021/ie403506s10.1021/ie403506s ↗
58. 10.1016/j.jece.2020.10436410.1016/j.jece.2020.104364 ↗
59. 10.1016/S1010-6030(02)00015-110.1016/S1010-6030(02)00015-1 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.cej.2013.11.03110.1016/j.cej.2013.11.031 ↗
61. 10.1021/la001110m10.1021/la001110m ↗
62. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.04.00810.1016/j.jphotochem.2013.04.008 ↗
63. Eufinger K · 2008