journal article·2016-12

Creating Atomic Models of Brittle Glasses for In Silico Mechanical Tests

Yunfeng Shi

Publisher page

Abstract

Atomic level computer simulation has become indispensable in understanding the mechanical properties of glasses, among other properties. However, the majority of model glasses are more ductile than their intended experimental counterparts, partially reflected by the overestimation of the Poisson's ratio. We have previously introduced an effective force field tuning method of imposing an additional energy penalty term to embrittle a binary Lennard–Jones glass. Here, we improved this method by varying the applied range of the energy penalty. The new method stabilizes the model glass even for high energy penalty values. Furthermore, unlike the old method, there is no unintended reduction in density for brittle glasses. Uniaxial tension tests were conducted to show the ductile‐to‐brittle transition as the energy penalty increases in strength. Crack propagation simulation was also conducted to demonstrate the efficacy of studying brittle fracture using the model glass.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Glass properties and applications · Metallic Glasses and Amorphous Alloys · Nuclear materials and radiation effects

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Materials Science and Engineering Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Troy New York 12180

Science and Technology Division Corning Incorporated Corning New York 14831

Department of Materials Science Jilin University Changchun 130012 China

Funding

Corning Incorporated Foundation · Jilin University · National Science Foundation

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1557/mrs2000.7210.1557/mrs2000.72 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.706210.1103/PhysRevB.60.7062 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.14830410.1103/PhysRevLett.89.148304 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.08550310.1103/PhysRevLett.89.085503 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.00810.1016/j.actamat.2014.09.008 ↗
6. 10.1038/srep0503510.1038/srep05035 ↗
7. 10.3389/fmats.2014.0002010.3389/fmats.2014.00020 ↗
8. 10.1111/ijag.1205810.1111/ijag.12058 ↗
9. 10.1080/0950083050008047410.1080/09500830500080474 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.486295910.1063/1.4862959 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.09550210.1103/PhysRevLett.95.095502 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.01110.1016/j.actamat.2008.07.011 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.21420110.1103/PhysRevB.73.214201 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.02710.1016/j.actamat.2009.03.027 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.304358710.1063/1.3043587 ↗
16. Molecular Dynamics Study of the Binary Cu46Zr54 Metallic Glass Motivated by Experiments: Glass Formation and Atomic‐Level Structure
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.24550110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.245501 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.352710.1103/PhysRevB.59.3527 ↗
19. 10.2320/matertrans.MJ20076910.2320/matertrans.MJ200769 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.06410810.1103/PhysRevB.73.064108 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.14420510.1103/PhysRevB.69.144205 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.375210.1103/PhysRevA.44.3752 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.462610.1103/PhysRevE.51.4626 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevE.52.413410.1103/PhysRevE.52.4134 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.12810.1103/PhysRevB.45.128 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.45.11510.1103/PhysRevB.45.115 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.292410.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2924 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevA.46.R298410.1103/PhysRevA.46.R2984 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRev.134.A132910.1103/PhysRev.134.A1329 ↗
30. 10.1080/0141861810823955310.1080/01418618108239553 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.199901310.1063/1.1999013 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.195510.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1955 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.22420310.1103/PhysRevB.69.224203 ↗
34. 10.1021/jp061101810.1021/jp0611018 ↗
35. 10.1063/1.349345610.1063/1.3493456 ↗
36. 10.1016/0022-3093(93)90123-F10.1016/0022-3093(93)90123-F ↗
37. 10.1016/0025-5416(76)90184-110.1016/0025-5416(76)90184-1 ↗
38. 10.1063/1.184459310.1063/1.1844593 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.19570110.1103/PhysRevLett.89.195701 ↗
40. 10.1063/1.44733410.1063/1.447334 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevA.31.169510.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.09.01110.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2015.09.011 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.22550110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.225501 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-010.1016/S0022-5096(99)00029-0 ↗
45. 10.1080/1364281910820762110.1080/13642819108207621 ↗
46. 10.1080/0950083100363078110.1080/09500831003630781 ↗
47. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.06410410.1103/PhysRevB.80.064104 ↗