Simulation and measurement of ultrathin glass residual stress
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Accurate simulation and measurement of the residual stress are pressing needs in ultrathin glass (UTG) industrial stable production. Herein, the heat transfer in an annealing lehr and the residual stresses at different positions along the width of the UTG ribbon were simulated by the finite element method and measured via the Vickers indentation. The residual stresses at 400 and 600 mm to the edge were large, which caused serious production loss. Besides, we conducted molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to reveal the mechanism for residual stress formation. During UTG cooling, the cooling rate of the core is slower than that of the surface. Due to the influence of the relaxation process, the latter would hinder the former's R–O (where R is Na, Mg, Ca, Al, or Si) length contraction, implying that the surface would generate residual compressive stress. The temperature difference between them increases as the cooling rate grows, leading to the residual stress increase. Finally, based on revealing the formation principle of residual stress by MD, the edge electric heatings were set in zone B, and the residual stresses at 400 and 600 mm to the edge are reduced.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Laser Material Processing Techniques · Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques · Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Metastable Materials Science and Technology Yanshan University Qinhuangdao China
Yichang Nanbo Photoelectric Glass Co., Ltd Yichang China
Hebei Key Laboratory of Applied Chemistry, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering Yanshan University Qinhuangdao China
Funding
National Key Research and Development Program of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/S0040-6090(02)00647-810.1016/S0040-6090(02)00647-8 ↗
2. 10.1557/PROC-769-H9.110.1557/PROC-769-H9.1 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1474-6670(17)67924-210.1016/S1474-6670(17)67924-2 ↗
4. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10487.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10487.x ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.11.00510.1016/j.jcp.2013.11.005 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.10.06810.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.10.068 ↗
7. 10.1016/S1359-6454(02)00316-610.1016/S1359-6454(02)00316-6 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.01410.1016/j.actamat.2006.12.014 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.dental.2009.07.00110.1016/j.dental.2009.07.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.actamat.2020.11651310.1016/j.actamat.2020.116513 ↗
11. Numerical simulation of soda‐lime silicate glass tempering
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:8(914)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1999)125:8(914) ↗
13. 10.1617/s11527-009-9558-z10.1617/s11527-009-9558-z ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruc.2010.05.00410.1016/j.compstruc.2010.05.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.08.01810.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.08.018 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40940-017-0053-610.1007/s40940-017-0053-6 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.11.02710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2006.11.027 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.gca.2006.11.01510.1016/j.gca.2006.11.015 ↗
19. A new transferable interatomic potential for molecular dynamics simulations of borosilicate glasses
20. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb09162.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1969.tb09162.x ↗
21. 10.1007/s11340-011-9558-010.1007/s11340-011-9558-0 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10717-012-9434-010.1007/s10717-012-9434-0 ↗
23. 10.1016/0022-3093(95)00320-710.1016/0022-3093(95)00320-7 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.08.00710.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2013.08.007 ↗
25. 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10361.x10.1111/j.1151-2916.1982.tb10361.x ↗
26. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.11973410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.119734 ↗
27. 10.1063/1.500708310.1063/1.5007083 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0009-2614(02)00434-710.1016/S0009-2614(02)00434-7 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.05.01410.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2011.05.014 ↗
30. Fictive temperature, cooling rate, and viscosity of glasses