A Hybrid Architecture for Safe Human–Robot Industrial Tasks
Source abstract
Abstract
In the context of Industry 5.0, human–robot collaboration (HRC) is increasingly crucial for enabling safe and efficient operations in shared industrial workspaces. This study aims to implement a hybrid robotic architecture based on the Speed and Separation Monitoring (SSM) collaborative scenario defined in ISO/TS 15066. The system calculates the minimum protective separation distance between the robot and the operators and slows down or stops the robot according to the risk assessment computed in real time. Compared to existing solutions, the approach prevents collisions and maximizes workcell production by reducing the robot speed only when the calculated safety index indicates an imminent risk of collision. The proposed distributed software architecture utilizes the ROS2 framework, integrating three modules: (1) a fast and reliable human tracking module based on the OptiTrack system that considerably reduces latency times or false positives, (2) an intention estimation (IE) module, employing a linear Kalman filter (LKF) to predict the operator’s next position and velocity, thus considering the current scenario and not the worst case, and (3) a robot control module that computes the protective separation distance and assesses the safety index by measuring the Euclidean distance between operators and the robot. This module dynamically adjusts robot speed to maintain safety while minimizing unnecessary slowdowns, ensuring the efficiency of collaborative tasks. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed system effectively balances safety and speed, optimizing overall performance in human–robot collaborative industrial environments, with significant improvements in productivity and reduced risk of accidents.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Robot Manipulation and Learning · Manufacturing Process and Optimization · Digital Transformation in Industry
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Industriale e Scienze Matematiche (DIISM), Universitá Politecnica delle Marche, 60131 Ancona, Italy
Dipartimento di Scienze Teoriche e Applicate (DiSTA), Universitá Telematica eCampus, 22060 Novedrate, Italy
Funding
PIANO NAZIONALE DI RIPRESA E RESILIENZA (PNRR)
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. (2025, January 21). The DYNAMICA Project. Available online: https://www.cobotics.it/.
2. (2011). Robots and Robotic Devices—Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots. Part 1: Robots. Standard No. ISO 10218-1:2011. Technical Report.
3. (2011). Robots and Robotic Devices—Safety Requirements for Industrial Robots. Part 2: Robot System and Integration. Standard No. ISO 10218-2:2011. Technical Report.
4. (2016). Robots and Robotic Devices—Collaborative Robots. Standard No. ISO/TS 15066:2016. Technical Report.
5. Quantitative Safety Guarantees for Physical Human-Robot Interaction10.1177/02783649030227004 ↗
6. Haddadin, S., and Albu-Schaffer, A.D.L.A.H.G. (2008, January 22–26). Collision Detection and Reaction: A Contribution to Safe Physical Human-Robot Interaction. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Nice, France.10.1109/IROS.2008.4650764 ↗
7. A Conformable Force/Tactile Skin for Physical Human–Robot Interaction10.1109/LRA.2015.2505061 ↗
8. Geravand, M., Flacco, F., and Luca, A.D. (2013, January 6–10). Human-robot physical interaction and collaboration using an industrial robot with a closed control architecture. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Karlsruhe, Germany.10.1109/ICRA.2013.6631141 ↗
9. Lou, S., Hu, Z., Zhang, Y., Feng, Y., Zhou, M., and Lv, C. (2024). Human-cyber-physical system for industry 5.0: A review from a human-centric perspective. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 1–18.10.1109/TASE.2024.3360476 ↗
10. Costanzo, M., De Maria, G., Lettera, G., Natale, C., and Perrone, D. (2019, January 6–9). A Multimodal Perception System for Detection of Human Operators in Robotic Work Cells. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics (SMC), Bari, Italy.10.1109/SMC.2019.8914519 ↗
11. A Multimodal Approach to Human Safety in Collaborative Robotic Workcells10.1109/TASE.2020.3043286 ↗
12. Ong, K.S., Hsu, Y.H., and Fu, L.C. (2012, January 7–12). Sensor fusion based human detection and tracking system for human-robot interaction. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Vilamoura-Algarve, Portugal.10.1109/IROS.2012.6386222 ↗
13. Kaplan, H. (2007). Practical Applications of Infrared Thermal Sensing and Imaging Equipment, SPIE Publications.10.1117/3.725072 ↗
14. Lettera, G., Bajrami, A., Costa, D., and Callegari, M. (2024). Dynamic Safety Evaluation and Risk Mitigation Strategies for Collaborative Kitting. New Trends in Mechanism and Machine Science, Springer.10.1007/978-3-031-67295-8_32 ↗
15. Flacco, F., Kroger, T., Luca, A.D., and Khatib, O. (2012, January 14–18). A depth space approach to human-robot collision avoidance. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA.10.1109/ICRA.2012.6225245 ↗
16. Ensuring safety in human-robot coexisting environment based on two-level protection10.1108/IR-12-2015-0222 ↗
17. Safety in human-multi robot collaborative scenarios: A trajectory scaling approach10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.11.540 ↗
18. Caccavale, F., Ott, C., Winkler, B., and Taylor, Z. (2020). PIROS: Cooperative, Safe and Reconfigurable Robotic Companion for CNC Pallets Load/Unload Stations. Bringing Innovative Robotic Technologies from Research Labs to Industrial End-Users: The Experience of the European Robotics Challenges, Springer International Publishing.
19. (2025, January 21). The OptiTrack Website. Available online: https://www.optitrack.com/.
20. (2025, January 21). The OptiTrack Calibration Procedure. Available online: https://docs.optitrack.com/motive/calibration.
21. Automated and cycle time optimized path planning for robot-based inspection systems10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.021 ↗
22. Notes on feasibility and optimality conditions of small-scale multifunction robotic cell scheduling problems with pickup restrictions10.1109/TII.2014.2371334 ↗