journal article·2024-10-12Open access

An NLP-Based Perfume Note Estimation Based on Descriptive Sentences

Jooyoung Kim, Kangrok Oh, Beom-Seok Oh

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 20

Abstract

The perfume industry is a suitable candidate for applying advanced natural language processing techniques, yet most existing studies focus on developing fragrance design systems based on artificial intelligence advances. To meet the increasing demand for analyzing and exploiting descriptive sentences for the fragrance market, we investigate the relationship between descriptive sentences of perfumes and their notes in this paper. Our purpose for this investigation is to build a core idea for a perfume recommendation system of descriptive sentences. To accomplish this, we propose a system for perfume note estimation of descriptive sentences based on several sentence transformer models. In our leave-one-out cross-validation tests using our dataset containing 62 perfumes and 255 perfume notes, we achieved significant performance improvements (from a 37.1∼41.1% to 72.6∼79.0% hit rate with the top five items, and from a 22.1∼31.9% to a 57.3∼63.2% mean reciprocal rank) for perfume note estimation via our fine-tuning process. In addition, some qualitative examples, including query descriptions, estimated perfume notes, and the ground truth perfume notes, are presented. The proposed system improves the perfume note estimation performances using a fine-tuning process on a newly constructed dataset containing descriptive sentences of perfumes and their notes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Color perception and design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Convergence Software, Myongji University, Seoul 03674, Republic of Korea

Department of Electronic Engineering, Sunchon National University, Suncheon-si 57922, Jeollanam-do, Republic of Korea

Department of Applied Artificial Intelligence, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul 01811, Republic of Korea

Funding

Research Program funded by the SeoulTech (Seoul National University of Science and Technology)

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Cao, M., and Ling, X. (2022). Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose. Appl. Sci., 12.10.3390/app12199716 ↗
2. Zárate, V., and Hernández, D.C. (2024). Simplified Deep Learning for Accessible Fruit Quality Assessment in Small Agricultural Operations. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14188243 ↗
3. Deep reinforcement learning for autonomous driving: A survey10.1109/TITS.2021.3054625 ↗
4. AI in health and medicine10.1038/s41591-021-01614-0 ↗
5. Production and operations management for intelligent manufacturing: A systematic literature review10.1080/00207543.2021.2017055 ↗
6. Ortega-Fernández, A., Martín-Rojas, R., and García-Morales, V.J. (2020). Artificial intelligence in the urban environment: Smart cities as models for developing innovation and sustainability. Sustainability, 12.10.3390/su12197860 ↗
7. What ChatGPT and generative AI mean for science10.1038/d41586-023-00340-6 ↗
8. Natural language processing for analyzing online customer reviews: A survey, taxonomy, and open research challenges10.7717/peerj-cs.2203 ↗
9. Achiam, J., Adler, S., Agarwal, S., Ahmad, L., Akkaya, I., Aleman, F.L., Almeida, D., Altenschmidt, J., Altman, S., and Anadkat, S. (2023). GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv.
10. Goodwin, R., Maria, J., Das, P., Horesh, R., Segal, R., Fu, J., and Harris, C. (2017, January 8). AI for fragrance design. Proceedings of the Machine Learning for Creativity and Design Workshop at NIPS, Long Beach, CA, USA.
11. Sanchez-Lengeling, B., Wei, J.N., Lee, B.K., Gerkin, R.C., Aspuru-Guzik, A., and Wiltschko, A.B. (2019). Machine learning for scent: Learning generalizable perceptual representations of small molecules. arXiv.
12. Optimal fragrances formulation using a deep learning neural network architecture: A novel systematic approach10.1016/j.compchemeng.2021.107344 ↗
13. A principal odor map unifies diverse tasks in human olfactory perception10.1126/science.ade4401 ↗
14. The expert system for assessing customer satisfaction on fragrance notes: Using artificial neural networks10.1016/j.cie.2006.04.006 ↗
15. An expert system for perfume selection using artificial neural network10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.008 ↗
16. Mazzonello, V., Gaglio, S., Augello, A., and Pilato, G. (2013, January 16–18). A study on classification methods applied to sentiment analysis. Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Semantic Computing, Irvine, CA, USA.10.1109/ICSC.2013.82 ↗
17. Digitization of healthcare sector: A study on privacy and security concerns10.1016/j.icte.2023.02.007 ↗
18. Suhaeni, C., and Yong, H.S. (2024). Enhancing Imbalanced Sentiment Analysis: A GPT-3-Based Sentence-by-Sentence Generation Approach. Appl. Sci., 14.10.3390/app14020622 ↗
19. Engineering perfumes10.1002/aic.10530 ↗
20. A method of creation in perfumery
21. (2024, October 08). The Good Scents Company—Flavor, Fragrance, Food and Cosmetics Ingredients Information. Available online: http://www.thegoodscentscompany.com.
22. Associates, L. (2024, October 08). PMP 2001—Database of Perfumery Materials and Performance. Available online: https://www.leffingwell.com/bacispmp.htm.
23. Predicting human olfactory perception from chemical features of odor molecules10.1126/science.aal2014 ↗
24. Long short-term memory10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 ↗
25. Kennedy, J., and Eberhart, R. (December, January 27). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the ICNN’95-International Conference on Neural Networks, Perth, WA, Australia.
26. Russell, S.J., and Norvig, P. (2016). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Pearson.
27. Perfume odor categorization: To what extent trained assessors and consumers agree?10.1111/joss.12025 ↗
28. Words of scents: A linguistic analysis of online perfume reviews10.1515/lingvan-2022-0135 ↗
29. Basenotes (2024, October 08). Basenotes—Perfume Reviews and Fragrance News. Available online: https://basenotes.com/.
30. Effectiveness of fine-tuned BERT model in classification of helpful and unhelpful online customer reviews10.1007/s10660-022-09560-w ↗
31. Reimers, N., and Gurevych, I. (2019, January 3–7). Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Hong Kong, China.10.18653/v1/D19-1410 ↗
32. Cer, D., Diab, M., Agirre, E., Lopez-Gazpio, I., and Specia, L. (2017). Semeval-2017 task 1: Semantic textual similarity-multilingual and cross-lingual focused evaluation. arXiv.10.18653/v1/S17-2001 ↗
33. MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understanding
34. Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., and Wolf, T. (2019). DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: Smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter. arXiv.
35. Wang, W., Wei, F., Dong, L., Bao, H., Yang, N., and Zhou, M. (2020, January 6–12). Minilm: Deep self-attention distillation for task-agnostic compression of pre-trained transformers. Proceedings of the Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
36. Loshchilov, I. (2017). Decoupled weight decay regularization. arXiv.
37. Saracevic, T. (1995, January 9–13). Evaluation of evaluation in information retrieval. Proceedings of the 18th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, Seattle, WD, USA.10.1145/215206.215351 ↗
38. Voorhees, E.M. (1999, January 17–19). The TREC-8 question answering track report. Proceedings of the TREC, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.10.6028/NIST.SP.500-246.qa-overview ↗