journal article·2024-05-22Open access

Combining the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process Method with the Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment Method to Address Internet Platform Selection Problems in an Environment with Incomplete Information

Kuei-Hu Chang, Hsin-Hung Lai, Bo-Jiun Hung

Applied Sciences· Volume 14· Issue 11

Abstract

With the advancement of information technology, the Internet is pivotal in today’s society, serving as a global connectivity platform. Leveraging Internet technology within an enterprise can improve operational efficiency and curtail costs. However, traditional Internet platform selection methods cannot simultaneously handle quantitative and qualitative information, fuzzy semantics, and incomplete expert-provided information. To address these limitations, this study integrated the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) and the weighted aggregated sum product assessment (WASPAS) approaches to tackle Internet platform selection problems within an incomplete information environment. To demonstrate the validity of this research approach, this study utilized a construction industry Internet platform selection case to confirm the efficacy of the proposed novel fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based method. Comparative analysis against the weighted sum model (WSM), weighted product model (WPM), FAHP, and typical WASPAS approaches was conducted with numerical verification, revealing that the proposed method in this study effectively manages comprehensive information and yields more rational outcomes for construction industry Internet platforms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Multi-Criteria Decision Making

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Management Sciences, R.O.C. Military Academy, Kaohsiung 830, Taiwan

Graduate School of Technological and Vocational Education, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Yunlin 640, Taiwan

Funding

National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan

References (43)

Show source-provided references
1. Internet of Things process selection: AHP selection method10.1007/s00170-018-2617-2 ↗
2. A multi-criteria analysis for an internet of things application recommendation system10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101216 ↗
3. Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytical Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill Education.10.21236/ADA214804 ↗
4. Evaluation and design of dining room chair based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and Fuzzy AHP10.15376/biores.18.2.2574-2588 ↗
5. Groselj, P., Zandebasiri, M., and Malovrh, S.P. (2023). Evaluation of the European experts on the application of the AHP method in sustainable forest management. Environ. Dev. Sustain., epub ahead of printing.10.1007/s10668-023-03859-w ↗
6. A novel AHP-based benefit evaluation model of military simulation training systems10.1155/2015/956757 ↗
7. A sustainable modelling for solid waste management using analytical hierarchy process, Monte Carlo simulation and NSGA-III
8. Spatial multi-criteria decision making approach for wind farm site selection: A case study in Balikesir, Turkey10.1016/j.rser.2023.114158 ↗
9. Application of AHP and geospatial technologies to assess ecotourism suitability: A case study of Saint Martin’s Island in Bangladesh
10. Method for selecting certification standards for food safety10.1007/s12571-023-01370-8 ↗
12. IoT and cloud-based COVID-19 risk of infection prediction using hesitant intuitionistic fuzzy set10.1007/s00500-023-09548-0 ↗
13. Multi-attribute decision-making based on similarity measure between picture fuzzy sets and the MARCOS method10.1016/j.ins.2023.119990 ↗
14. A novel risk ranking method based on the single valued neutrosophic set10.3934/jimo.2021065 ↗
15. A hybrid time series forecasting method based on neutrosophic logic with applications in financial issues10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107531 ↗
16. A new similarity function for Pythagorean fuzzy sets with application in football analysis10.3934/math.2024242 ↗
17. Selection of best enterprise resource planning system by using Hamy mean operator with complex spherical fuzzy information10.1016/j.aej.2023.11.079 ↗
18. Enhanced assessment of a supplier selection problem by integration of soft sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set10.1177/0954405414539498 ↗
19. A review of fuzzy AHP methods for decision-making with subjective judgements10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113738 ↗
20. Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.04.010 ↗
21. A fuzzy AHP approach to personnel selection problem10.1016/j.asoc.2008.09.003 ↗
22. Development of a material circularity evaluation framework for building construction projects10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.140562 ↗
23. Temporary safety zone site selection during haze Pollution: An integrated approach with FAHP and FTOPSIS10.1016/j.eswa.2023.123002 ↗
24. Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making framework for controlling methane explosions in coal mines10.1007/s11356-023-31782-0 ↗
25. A novel randomized weighted fuzzy AHP by using modified normalization with the TOPSIS for optimal stock portfolio selection model integrated with an effective sensitive analysis10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122770 ↗
26. Prioritization of sub-watersheds for soil conservation management using morphometric, biophysical and socioeconomic characteristics: A fuzzy AHP approach10.1007/s12665-023-11410-3 ↗
27. Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810 ↗
28. Air cargo company selection under a state of chaos: An integrated bayesian BWM and WASPAS approach
29. Evaluation of the suitability of dental filling materials for green production by WASPAS method10.1504/IJGW.2023.133210 ↗
30. Risk assessment based on failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and WASPAS methods under probabilistic double hierarchy linguistic term sets10.1016/j.cie.2023.109758 ↗
31. An integrated decision support framework for resilient vaccine supply chain network design10.1016/j.engappai.2023.106945 ↗
32. Selection of tramcars for sustainable urban transportation by using the modified WASPAS approach based on Heronian operators10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111127 ↗
33. An integrated three-way decision methodology for sustainability of wastewater circularity in thermal power plants10.1016/j.asoc.2023.111111 ↗
34. Entropy weighted WASPAS and MACBETH approaches for optimizing the performance of solar water heating system10.1016/j.csite.2023.103922 ↗
35. Geoheritage assessment with entropy-based WASPAS approach: An analysis on karcal mountains (Turkey)10.1007/s12371-022-00777-7 ↗
36. Comparative applicability of MCDM-SWOT based techniques for developing integrated watershed management framework10.1111/nrm.12380 ↗
37. Chang, K.H. (2023). Integrating subjective–objective weights consideration and a combined compromise solution method for handling supplier selection issues. Systems, 11.10.3390/systems11020074 ↗
38. Reliability assessment of an aircraft propulsion system using IFS and OWA tree10.1080/03052150802132914 ↗
39. A performance evaluation model by integrating fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods10.1016/j.eswa.2010.04.066 ↗
40. Fedai, Y. (2023). Optimization of drilling parameters in drilling of MWCNT-reinforced GFRP nanocomposites using fuzzy AHP-weighted Taguchi-based MCDM methods. Processes, 11.10.3390/pr11102872 ↗
41. Li, K., Duan, T.L., Li, Z.R., Xiahou, X.E., Zeng, N.S., and Li, Q.M. (2022). Development path of construction industry internet platform: An AHP–TOPSIS integrated approach. Buildings, 12.10.3390/buildings12040441 ↗
42. Revisiting ranking accuracy within WASPAS method10.1108/K-01-2019-0052 ↗
43. A new consumer profile definition method based on fuzzy technology and fuzzy AHP10.2478/aut-2021-0027 ↗