Using Voxelisation-Based Data Analysis Techniques for Porosity Prediction in Metal Additive Manufacturing
Source abstract
Abstract
Additive manufacturing workflows generate large amounts of data in each phase, which can be very useful for monitoring process performance and predicting the quality of the finished part if used correctly. In this paper, a framework is presented that utilises machine learning methods to predict porosity defects in printed parts. Data from process settings, in-process sensor readings, and post-process computed tomography scans are first aligned and discretised using a voxelisation approach to create a training dataset. A multi-step classification system is then proposed to classify the presence and type of porosity in a voxel, which can then be utilised to find the distribution of porosity within the build volume. Titanium parts were printed using a laser powder bed fusion system. Two discretisation techniques based on voxelisation were utilised: a defect-centric and a uniform discretisation method. Different machine learning models, feature sets, and other parameters were also tested. Promising results were achieved in identifying porous voxels; however, the accuracy of the classification requires improvement before being applied industrially. The potential of the voxelisation-based framework for this application and its ability to incorporate data from different stages of the additive manufacturing workflow as well as different machine learning models was clearly demonstrated.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Manufacturing Process and Optimization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Laboratory for Advanced Manufacturing Simulation and Robotics, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
Funding
Science Foundation Ireland (SFI) · European Regional Development Fund and I-Form industry partners
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Heat treatment of Ti-6Al-7Nb components produced by selective laser melting10.1108/13552540810907974 ↗
2. An overview of Direct Laser Deposition for additive manufacturing; Part II: Mechanical behavior, process parameter optimization and control
3. Fatigue behavior and failure mechanisms of direct laser deposited Ti–6Al–4V10.1016/j.msea.2015.12.026 ↗
4. Optimization of Process Parameters for Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing by Combination of Machine Learning and Finite Element Method: A Conceptual Framework10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.204 ↗
5. Monitoring and prediction of porosity in laser powder bed fusion using physics-informed meltpool signatures and machine learning10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2022.117550 ↗
6. In-Process monitoring of porosity during laser additive manufacturing process
7. Influence of process parameters on the correlation between in-situ process monitoring data and the mechanical properties of Ti-6Al-4V non-stochastic cellular structures
8. Toward Sub-Surface Pore Prediction Capabilities for Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Data Science10.1115/1.4050461 ↗
9. Defect structure process maps for laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
10. Jeon, T., Hwang, T., Yun, H., Vantyne, C., and Moon, Y. (2018). Control of Porosity in Parts Produced by a Direct Laser Melting Process. Appl. Sci., 8.10.3390/app8122573 ↗
11. Research and application of machine learning for additive manufacturing
12. A multi-scale convolutional neural network for autonomous anomaly detection and classification in a laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing process
13. In-situ measurement and monitoring methods for metal powder bed fusion: An updated review10.1088/1361-6501/ac0b6b ↗
14. Analysis and correction of defects within parts fabricated using powder bed fusion technology10.1088/2051-672X/3/3/034002 ↗
15. Machine learning-assisted acoustic emission monitoring for track formability prediction of laser powder bed fusion10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.108522 ↗
16. On the application of in-situ monitoring systems and machine learning algorithms for developing quality assurance platforms in laser powder bed fusion: A review10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.05.048 ↗
17. Multi-modal sensor fusion with machine learning for data-driven process monitoring for additive manufacturing
18. Automatic quality assessments of laser powder bed fusion builds from photodiode sensor measurements10.1007/s40964-021-00219-w ↗
19. Prediction of lack of fusion porosity in selective laser melting based on melt pool monitoring data
20. Automatic fault detection for laser powder-bed fusion using semi-supervised machine learning
21. Bonato, N., Sinico, M., Zanini, F., Dewulf, W., and Carmignato, S. (2023, January 19–21). Towards the improvement of high-speed laser powder bed fusion using aligned datasets obtained from process monitoring based on photodiode signal variation and post-process X-ray computed tomography. Proceedings of the Special Interest Group Meeting on Advancing Precision in Additive Manufacturing, Leuven, Belgium.
22. Kim, F., and Moylan, S. (2018). Literature Review of Metal Additive Manufacturing Defects, Advanced Manufacturing Series (NIST AMS).10.6028/NIST.AMS.100-16 ↗
23. Invited Review Article: Review of the formation and impact of flaws in powder bed fusion additive manufacturing
24. Keyhole-induced porosities in Laser-based Powder Bed Fusion (L-PBF) of Ti6Al4V: High-fidelity modelling and experimental validation
25. Nudelis, N., and Mayr, P. (2021). A Novel Classification Method for Pores in Laser Powder Bed Fusion. Metals, 11.10.3390/met11121912 ↗
26. Formation of keyhole and lack of fusion pores during the laser powder bed fusion process10.1016/j.mfglet.2022.01.005 ↗
27. Methods for Rapid Pore Classification in Metal Additive Manufacturing10.1007/s11837-019-03761-9 ↗
28. Microstructural porosity in additive manufacturing: The formation and detection of pores in metal parts fabricated by powder bed fusion10.1002/amp2.10021 ↗
29. Directed energy deposition (DED) additive manufacturing: Physical characteristics, defects, challenges and applications10.1016/j.mattod.2021.03.020 ↗
30. Porosity testing methods for the quality assessment of selective laser melted parts10.1016/j.cirp.2016.04.054 ↗
31. Towards material and process agnostic features for the classification of pore types in metal additive manufacturing10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111757 ↗
32. Leach, R.K., and Carmignato, S. (2020). Precision Metal Additive Manufacturing, Taylor & Francis Group.10.1201/9780429436543 ↗
33. Voxelization modelling based finite element simulation and process parameter optimization for Fused Filament Fabrication10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108409 ↗
34. A systematic review of voxelization method in additive manufacturing10.1051/meca/2019058 ↗
35. Microcomputed tomography analysis of intralayer porosity generation in laser direct metal deposition and its causes10.2351/1.3582311 ↗
36. Renishaw Plc (2017). InfiniAM Spectral—Energy Input and Melt Pool Emissions Monitoring for AM Systems, Renishaw Plc.
37. (2023, June 27). Phoenix Datos|x—CT Data Acquisition Software. v 2.4.0. Available online: https://www.bakerhughes.com/waygate-technologies/ndt-software/phoenix-datosx-industrial-ct-scanning-software.
38. (2023, June 27). VGSTUDIO MAX. Available online: https://www.volumegraphics.com/en/products/vgsm.html.
39. Effects of porosity on the mechanical properties of additively manufactured components: A critical review10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d ↗
40. Feature-based volumetric defect classification in metal additive manufacturing10.1038/s41467-022-34122-x ↗