A Novel Nonlinear Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Model for Magnetic Flux Leakage System
Source abstract
Abstract
To ensure efficient inspection using the magnetic flux leakage (MFL) method, generating a flux density near the saturation level within the tested material is essential. This requirement brings high flux density conditions in the system’s pole regions. Hence, leakage flux within the slot is excessively triggered, leading to distortion of the defect signal. In this context, the system dimensions stand out as one of the most significant factors affecting the mentioned flux distributions. Therefore, various alternative solutions with different system dimensions arise in the design process of the MFL system. This study proposes a magnetic equivalent circuit (MEC) model to achieve optimal system design. The proposed MEC model is designed considering the nonlinear behavior of the material, leakage flux, and fringing effects. Verification results demonstrate that the MEC model consistently tracks the finite element analysis (FEA) results in calculating the flux densities. Furthermore, the relative errors in the flux density calculations of the tested material are at a maximum level of 10.2% and an average of 5.2% compared to the FEA. These findings indicate that the proposed MEC model can be effectively utilized in rapid prototyping and optimization procedures of MFL system design by providing fast solutions with reasonable accuracy.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Non-Destructive Testing Techniques · Magnetic Field Sensors Techniques · Electric Motor Design and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Naval Petty-Officer Vocational School, National Defence University, Yalova 77720, Turkey
Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Marmara University, Istanbul 34854, Turkey
Funding
Marmara University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Effects of Stress on MFL Responses from Elongated Corrosion Pits in Pipeline Steel10.1016/S0963-8695(99)00038-9 ↗
2. Sizing of 3-D Arbitrary Defects Using Magnetic Flux Leakage Measurements10.1109/TMAG.2009.2037008 ↗
3. A Single-Stage Enhancement-Identification Framework for Pipeline MFL Inspection10.1109/TIM.2022.3176285 ↗
4. Enhancement of Defect Characterization with AC Magnetic Flux Leakage: Far-Side Defect Shape Estimation and Sensor Lift-Off Compensation10.1109/TMAG.2022.3157794 ↗
5. A New MFL Imaging and Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation Method in Wire Rope Defect Detection10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108156 ↗
6. Adaptive Filtering Method of MFL Signal on Rail Top Surface Defect Detection10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3065044 ↗
7. Characterization of Defects on Ferromagnetic Tubes Using Magnetic Flux Leakage10.1109/TMAG.2019.2901659 ↗
8. Estimation of the Diameters, Depths and Separation Distances of the Closely-Spaced Pitting Defects Using Combination of Three Axial MFL Components10.1016/j.measurement.2019.02.077 ↗
9. Importance of Magnetizing Field on Magnetic Flux Leakage Signal of Defects10.1109/TMAG.2018.2809671 ↗
10. Wang, X., Chen, H., Shi, M., and Douadji, L. (2019). A Novel Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Model for the Corner of Inductor Core. Appl. Sci., 9.10.3390/app9245341 ↗
11. Jin, J.-M. (2015). Theory and Computation of Electromagnetic Fields, Wiley-IEEE Press.
12. Simple Nonlinear Magnetic Analysis for Permanent-Magnet Motors10.1109/TIA.2005.853376 ↗
13. Design and Analysis of a New Equivalent Magnetic Network Model for IPM Machines10.1109/TMAG.2020.2987546 ↗
14. Asghari, B., and Dinavahi, V. (2012, January 22–26). Novel Transmission Line Modeling Method for Nonlinear Permeance Network Based Simulation of Induction Machines. Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, San Diego, CA, USA.10.1109/PESGM.2012.6343928 ↗
15. Yilmaz, M., and Philip, T. (2008, January 15–19). Krein Capabilities of Finite Element Analysis and Magnetic Equivalent Circuits for Electrical Machine Analysis and Design. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Rhodes, Greece.10.1109/PESC.2008.4592584 ↗
16. An Improved Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Model for Iron-Core Linear Permanent-Magnet Synchronous Motors10.1109/TMAG.2009.2030674 ↗
17. Ned, M., Tore, M.U., and William, P.R. (1995). Power Electronics, Wiley. [2nd ed.].
18. Optimization of the Magnetic Circuit in the MFL Inspection System for Storage-Tank Floors10.1134/S1061830907050063 ↗
19. Multi-Objective Optimization of a Magnetic Circuit for Magnetic Flux Leakage-Type Nondestructive Testing10.1007/s10921-015-0329-1 ↗
20. Study on the Lift-off Effect on MFL Signals with Magnetic Circuit Model and 3D FEM10.1784/insi.2012.54.9.505 ↗
21. The Homogeneity Effects of Magnetic Flux Density Distribution on the Detection of Railhead Surface Defects via the Magnetic Flux Leakage Method10.1784/insi.2023.65.12.682 ↗
22. Sudhoff, S.D. (2014). Power Magnetic Devices: A Multi-Objective Design Approach, Wiley.
23. Modified Magnetic Equivalent Circuit of Double-Stator Single-Rotor Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Machine Considering Stator Radial-End Flux-Leakage10.1049/elp2.12379 ↗
24. Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Modeling of Induction Motors10.1109/TEC.2006.875471 ↗
25. A Comparison of Nodal- and Mesh-Based Magnetic Equivalent Circuit Models10.1109/TEC.2008.2002037 ↗
26. (2024, April 01). Math. Graphics. Programming. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab.html.
27. (2023, December 17). Ansys Maxwell Low Frequency EM Field Simulation. Available online: https://www.ansys.com/products/electronics/ansys-maxwell.