DataVXInternational Journal of Applied Glass SciencePaper
journal article·2020-10

Thermal shock and sulfuric acid corrosion behavior of enamel–nano‐Ni composite/enamel–nano‐nickel composite coating

Ken Chen, Minghui Chen, Aihua Yi, Kang Li, Wen Zhu, Zhongmiao Liao, Shenglong Zhu, Fuhui Wang

International Journal of Applied Glass Science· Volume 11· Issue 4
Publisher page
Source abstract

Abstract

Abstract Dense and well‐adherent enamel–nano‐Ni composite/enamel–nano‐nickel composite coatings were prepared on 304 steel. Their thermal shock (TS) resistance at 400°C as well as the chemical stability in sulfuric acid solution were investigated, and compared with pure enamel coatings. Results indicated that the nanocomposite coatings with 5 wt% of Ni particles exhibited the best resistance to TS. Almost no spalling of the coating occurs after 50 cycles of TS at 400°C. They also provided enough protective effect to the substrates from sulfuric acid corrosion. After 7 days of corrosion, the weight loss of Ni‐5 enamel coating was only 1.107 mg/cm 2 .
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

Metals & alloysNanomaterialsComposites

OpenAlex topics: Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · High-Temperature Coating Behaviors · High Entropy Alloys Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Material Science and Engineering Dongguan University of Technology Dongguan China

Novel Light Alloy and its Process Technology Key Laboratory of Dongguan City Dongguan China

Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials (Ministry of Education) School of Materials Science and Engineering Northeastern University Shenyang China

Corrosion and Protection Division Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science Institute of Metal Research Chinese Academy of Science Shenyang China

Funding

Ministry of Industry and Information Technology of the People's Republic of China · Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province

References (27)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.16010.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.160 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.11.00910.1016/j.corsci.2017.11.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.00110.1016/j.corsci.2013.03.001 ↗
4. 10.1016/S0272-8842(97)00080-110.1016/S0272-8842(97)00080-1 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.03210.1016/j.ceramint.2017.02.032 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.00910.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.02.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2008.07.00510.1016/j.ceramint.2008.07.005 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2007.03.00810.1016/j.ceramint.2007.03.008 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2008.11.02510.1016/j.ceramint.2008.11.025 ↗
10. Study on increasing acid resistance of cast iron enamel by milling addition of SiO2 nano‐powder
11. Influence of mill addition of ZrSiO4 on properties of the enamels
12. Influence of mill addition of mullite on properties of cast iron enamels
13. 10.1016/j.msea.2010.10.01510.1016/j.msea.2010.10.015 ↗
14. 10.1016/S1005-0302(12)60079-610.1016/S1005-0302(12)60079-6 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.corsci.2015.08.03310.1016/j.corsci.2015.08.033 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.01210.1016/j.corsci.2017.08.012 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.23210.1016/j.ceramint.2019.04.232 ↗
18. 10.1111/ijag.1228410.1111/ijag.12284 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.05.01110.1016/j.chemgeo.2005.05.011 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11661-997-0142-210.1007/s11661-997-0142-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.03310.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2010.04.033 ↗
22. 10.1038/srep3025610.1038/srep30256 ↗
23. 10.1111/ijag.1204610.1111/ijag.12046 ↗
24. 10.1007/s12540-009-0531-810.1007/s12540-009-0531-8 ↗
25. 10.1364/JOSA.11.00023310.1364/JOSA.11.000233 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.physb.2013.01.00610.1016/j.physb.2013.01.006 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.10852610.1016/j.corsci.2020.108526 ↗